Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

Started by madddann, March 26, 2014, 09:42:27 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 110 Guests are viewing this topic.

F_Brown

jbignes5,

I spent some time thinking about that patent you mentioned.  I have seen that one years ago when I first started looking into Tesla stuff.  The working principle there is rather simple.  It would be a lot easier to understand or at least visualize if 4 permanent magnets were used instead of the four coils on the stator, and then one belt was use to turn the stator, and another belt was use to turn the rotor.  If the belts were turning the two pieces in opposite directions at the same speed, then the effective rotational speed between the two part would be twice the physical speed of each one.  That's the idea of how Tesla was able to generator the equivalent output of higher speed generators with lower speed ones.  Tesla used one more level of complexity than what I described, in that he electrically rotated the pole of the stator coils with an AC generator he called an exciter. 

I having trouble understanding just what you mean by impulse, and how that fits into Tesla's electric dynamo.


Farmhand,

It's good to see you in on this one.  How's things going on the other forum?

jbignes5

Quote from: F_Brown on April 16, 2014, 02:56:58 PM
jbignes5,

I spent some time thinking about that patent you mentioned.  I have seen that one years ago when I first started looking into Tesla stuff.  The working principle there is rather simple.  It would be a lot easier to understand or at least visualize if 4 permanent magnets were used instead of the four coils on the stator, and then one belt was use to turn the stator, and another belt was use to turn the rotor.  If the belts were turning the two pieces in opposite directions at the same speed, then the effective rotational speed between the two part would be twice the physical speed of each one.  That's the idea of how Tesla was able to generator the equivalent output of higher speed generators with lower speed ones.  Tesla used one more level of complexity than what I described, in that he electrically rotated the pole of the stator coils with an AC generator he called an exciter. 

I having trouble understanding just what you mean by impulse, and how that fits into Tesla's electric dynamo.


Farmhand,

It's good to see you in on this one.  How's things going on the other forum?


If you use magnets in any other section of that patent then you loose the loop effect. This would destroy the concept. Tesla had this patent as the AC system he HAD designed. It was an improvement to that system as the text of the patent reads. The rotational fields can be simply adjusted by the wind direction which can be set to rotate in opposite direction the prime mover rotates PLUS the loop can be self maintained in that way. Also the belt was a pony break and he notes that this system was quite impossible to stop but there were limits to this. Those limits are the physical wire itself. Go beyond the current capability or the insulation and poof it would break.

When the patent is adopted to a single shaft it creates a self pumping loop which you can harvest the extra current for use in the prime mover and additional loads via a transformer. The belt again was used to check the motor and increase the current in the rotor coils. What if you connected the belt to a transmission? Hmmm... This is where I connected this to the Pierce arrow experiment.

MileHigh

As a suggestion there is no point in being all over the map, it seems to happen all time on these types of "device" threads.  I think that mining and linking to what the true replicators of the actual device are doing would be the most interesting.  What are their pictures, waveforms, and measurements like?  I am not sure if there is any hard data yet but I am not going to do an exhaustive search.  Perhaps someone really interested will carry that torch.

http://be-do.com/index.php/en/forum/qeg-general-topics/136-working-prototype?start=12

QuoteLarry, what does it mean that " we dont have units for powering homes yet " ?????
The top news asociated with QEG prototype is a free 10 kw device !!!!
if thats true we got a home powering unit !!!

Will the question be answered I wonder.

jbignes5




It was answered in a few of the videos provided. The 10k figure was a very short runtime and it couldn't maintain that power level hence the reason for a discovery period and further funding. The man said he had to back down the power to 4k which it could do easily. The problem being a weak insulation. This problem again showed up in the Taipei prototype which was talked about for the rewinding of the core. These problems were the main reason they went to Taipei. Since the first location was instructing an engineer and manufacturer, it would make learning about design improvement easier working with existing professionals.


We will have to see about if this holds true and what updates are applied and what actually works.


I'm still on the fence about the device but to me it sounds legit. But as usual time will only tell. As for the thread following a certain path, well it was sorta related since they look so similar and both are Tesla derived designs.


I doubt the threads direction will make any difference at all to the outcome since this is not originated from the Device producers and since this thread is basically a bashing thread without the possibility of direct answers from the parties involved, it seems to me any direction is better than the current one.

jdsanders

Cool lecture, jbig.  Thanks for the link.   :)


Quote from: jbignes5 on April 16, 2014, 02:14:37 PM


I know this is off topic a bit but please watch this video of a real explanation that describes the Universe we live in. This is so close to the truth we must understand this completely.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EguwaPRmamY