Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

Started by madddann, March 26, 2014, 09:42:27 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 93 Guests are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

Quantum Tesla scalar vortex! Parametric longitudinal re-gauging! It's the richest kind!

F_Brown

MilesHigh,

After some reflecting on the phasing dots this morning I realized that if the coils were arranged in bucking configuration, then when the rotor is in between poles, the coils will cancel out, and when the rotor is aligned with a pole, the flux will then flow though the rotor, allowing the magnetic field in each half of the stator as divided by the rotor to flow in opposite directions. 

This would sort of be similar to what would happen in a typical EI core, if the windings were wound on the out side legs instead of the middle one.  Also for this arrangement to work in the QEG I would expect the rotor to have twice the cross-sectional area of the stator, as the middle leg of an EI core does compared to the outside legs.

Additionally I got LTSpice to calculate a time varying value of inductance, although the resulting model fails to drive the tank circuit into significant oscillation.  Also with the time varying inductance there is a loss of a single sharp resonant peak in the system. 
SPICE is just the wrong application to model this device, because it fails to model the flux gating of the core.  What is needed is a magnetic modeling application that can also handle circuity.  Do we have anyone skilled in the art or magnetic modeling in the house?

Anyway, with the time varying value of inductance, I set it for 15H +/- 5H, I found that the main resonance which was only slightly dominant shifted from 411 Hz to 1328 Hz.  I change the capacitance value to 11 nano-farads and that brought the main resonance to 400 Hz.  Then varying the inductance value at 400 Hz failed to drive the tank into significant oscillation, see attached images. 

shinz62

Quote from: F_Brown on April 21, 2014, 11:59:56 AM
MilesHigh,

After some reflecting on the phasing dots this morning I realized that if the coils were arranged in bucking configuration, then when the rotor is in between poles, the coils will cancel out, and when the rotor is aligned with a pole, the flux will then flow though the rotor, allowing the magnetic field in each half of the stator as divided by the rotor to flow in opposite directions. 

This would sort of be similar to what would happen in a typical EI core, if the windings were wound on the out side legs instead of the middle one.  Also for this arrangement to work in the QEG I would expect the rotor to have twice the cross-sectional area of the stator, as the middle leg of an EI core does compared to the outside legs.

Additionally I got LTSpice to calculate a time varying value of inductance, although the resulting model fails to drive the tank circuit into significant oscillation.  Also with the time varying inductance there is a loss of a single sharp resonant peak in the system. 
SPICE is just the wrong application to model this device, because it fails to model the flux gating of the core.  What is needed is a magnetic modeling application that can also handle circuity.  Do we have anyone skilled in the art or magnetic modeling in the house?

Anyway, with the time varying value of inductance, I set it for 15H +/- 5H, I found that the main resonance which was only slightly dominant shifted from 411 Hz to 1328 Hz.  I change the capacitance value to 11 nano-farads and that brought the main resonance to 400 Hz.  Then varying the inductance value at 400 Hz failed to drive the tank into significant oscillation, see attached images.




F_Brown,


You are correct, in the bucking configuration they do cancel out when the rotor is mis-aligned, and correct again when it is aligned you get flux going through the rotor, which is not large enough to carry all the flux, as you mentioned it should be twice as large to handle it efficiently.


Here are screenshots from a femm simulation built to the dimensions from the drawing and .5 amp dc in the 3100T primary in bucking orientation, nothing in the 350T secondary.


This only requires 18 volts to achieve:


Primary:

Total current = 0.5 Amps
Voltage Drop = 18.3489 Volts
Flux Linkage = 17.8163 Webers
Flux/Current = 35.6327 Henries
Voltage/Current = 36.6978 Ohms
Power = 9.17445 Watts

shinz62

If you don't set it up to be bucking...then the rotor does absolutely nothing....