Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[MileHigh]

Luc,

In general terms, that posting by Peter Lindemann is basically correct in his reasoning and discussion of what's taking place from my perspective and from what I have learned over the past week.  However, where he stumbles and falls is in his claim of a COP of 1.2.  Notice he doesn't give any details about what that COP 1.2 even means.

Peter will never meet a challenge when somebody wants to get into an involved discussion with him about electronics and measurements and how a circuit actually words, etc, as far as I am aware.  People like Poynt99 and MarkE and PicoWatt could spin circles around Peter when it comes to electronics and measurements techniques and a whole gamut of hard core electronics and engineering stuff.  Peter is a lightweight that manages to create the illusion that he is very knowledgeable.

I am being somewhat harsh because I view Peter as a "pro" just like HopeGirl and company are crowd-funded pros that are deceiving people and acting unethically while creating the pretense of ethical behaviour.  Are they cons or are they clueless, I am not 100% sure.  But I myself have the common sense to get an expert opinion on something that I don't know much about.  I would be completely mortified to accept donations from people if I didn't know what I was doing.

So sorry to play the Bad Cop but Peter's COP 1.2 claims are junk.  If what he said was true his whole team would have received the Nobel Prize.

A magnetic core in an inductor or a transformer is a lossy mechanism for storing and then recovering magnetic energy by definition.  Even is it is 99.9% efficient at returning the energy that you put into it that is still lossy.  There is no such thing as a magnetic core returning more than you put into it.

Why is Peter claiming COP 1.2?  If you want to be really cynical you can speculate that he says that to keep the
"Peter Lindemann mystique/aura" going to keep those ticket sales high for the next Bedini/Lindemann/Aaron conference.  You play the tease to keep your audience stoked for the next paid live appearance.

Just keeping it real, I hope that you understand.

MileHigh

P.S.:  If any team does a faithful replication of this device the key to understanding it would be to construct a timing diagram that shows in front of your eyes how the thing works.  If there truly was over unity you would literally be able to show a "slice" in a waveform on your timing diagram where the free energy was manifesting itself.  The timing diagram and the associated schematic for any circuit and associated tests rules.  We will see if replication teams actually start reporting their results and if any of them show any timing diagrams.

[F_Brown]

shinz62,

I got a FEMM analysis done.  I scaled the core down by 1/2 in all dimensions.  It should use about 1/4 the material of the full sized one, and weight approximately 1/4 of the original.  I also made the stator a bit narrower and the rotor a bit wider to get the rotor to have twice the cross-sectional area of the stator, without making the rotor so wide as to cause problems with the poles taking up too much winding space.  I'm sure my model needs more work, although it was fun to some initial results with this application.  Perhaps this size core would be buildable for 1/4 of the cost of the full sized unit.

[ariovaldo]

This one is hard to build and it will take at least 100 hours to be done, but in my point of view is worthful to try.. Anyway, I'm here to learn and if this generator works, this will be great, if not I'm sure that I'll improve my knowledge...


Cheers


Ariovaldo

[gotoluc]

WOW Ariovaldo... you have a lot of courage and patience.

All the best to you in your tests

Luc

[TinselKoala]

Kudos to Lindemann for that report. It is very important for all "QEG" builders to read and understand what Peter is saying in that report. The "QEG" will NOT work as WhateverGirl and Robitaille claim it will. Never, no way Jose, and Peter and his friends explored the entire problem space long ago. I am not too concerned about the paltry claim of COP = 1.2..... that is sufficiently close to the noise floor as to not be exciting or even worth "replicating" his series of experiments to track down the ultimate error. His error analysis and correct recognition of the great reactive power in the system is much more important.

Here is the very most problematic statement in Lindemann's report:

since the experimental results were disappointing, no final report was ever produced.

Translation: We did not get the results we wanted, so why report anything?

It should be clear that this is egregious pseudoscientific misconduct. When you do an experiment and you get NULL RESULTS.... it is just as important to report those, perhaps even more important than your ... perhaps bogus ... "positive" results that appear to support your hypothesis.
Please refer to the Scientific Method: experiments are done with the purpose of _falsifying_ hypotheses. When you FAIL to falsify your hypothesis, MAYBE it is supported by your results. But when you DO falsify your hypothesis.... by producing "experimental results that are disappointing".... then you KNOW that your experiment does not support the hypothesis. For sure. This is VERY IMPORTANT information, and people who do not publish null results are doing a profound disservice to the community of researchers, as well as violating a fundamental principle, a core component, of the Scientific Method.