Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[ACG]

So far the demonstration tour has failed to demonstrate a working unit.  How much more of this is to go on before people start demanding evidence that they can deliver on their extraordinary claims?

If Yildiz and Keshe done it this long I suspect QEG will go for quite some time.

[TinselKoala]

I know why the numbers don't add up. You have ignored the word range... if you use those numbers it won't add up correctly. I cannot measure my rotor RPM since my test device is in a closed box, so I used approximate numbers and knowing this I added the word range.

One thing I can tell you is my variable frequency drive controller was set at 58.2Hz during the spectrum analysis test. What exact RPM my motor was able to turn the rotor at considering friction losses?  I don't know and not about to open the protective cover to find out when I know my I cores are only holding to the rotor with Epoxy.

Luc

Calm down!
I just noticed the interesting coincidence in the numbers...which as you see _do_ add up just the way I put them in my post. It's an example of how forgetting or not including the units (Hz, V, A, s, etc.)  in a calculation can lead to meaningless results that _look_ like they are significant. A highbrow kind of joke it is. You didn't put them together that way... I did! I am not criticizing or objecting to your work, you know I trust you to do the right things.

You can, and should, make an optical tachometer measurement of your rotating parts. It is easy to be fooled by either electrical or optical measurements alone, with certain kinds of rotating assemblies.
Even just a photodiode/LED pair looking at a mark on a shaft, monitored by a scope channel or even the DMM's "frequency" function, would be a good crosscheck on electrical measurements of rotation.

[gotoluc]

Calm down!
I just noticed the interesting coincidence in the numbers...which as you see _do_ add up just the way I put them in my post. It's an example of how forgetting or not including the units (Hz, V, A, s, etc.)  in a calculation can lead to meaningless results that _look_ like they are significant. A highbrow kind of joke it is. You didn't put them together that way... I did! I am not criticizing or objecting to your work, you know I trust you to do the right things.

You can, and should, make an optical tachometer measurement of your rotating parts. It is easy to be fooled by either electrical or optical measurements alone, with certain kinds of rotating assemblies.
Even just a photodiode/LED pair looking at a mark on a shaft, monitored by a scope channel or even the DMM's "frequency" function, would be a good crosscheck on electrical measurements of rotation.

Okay, no problem

here's a 1 ohm shunt power scope shot of the two 40w 120v bulbs in series on the mot hv coils at stable resonance.

The input power to frequency drive controller is 104 watts and frequency is set to 58.1Hz. This gives an electrical frequency of 28.4Hz  and about 2.5 watts of power is dissipated in the bulbs.
If I open the circuit then the power to the drive drops to 90 watts.

Luc

[PiCéd]

Excuse me, if I have a primary and a secondary, 10 KWh of electricity and a cos phi of 0,9999, is there theoricaly approximately 20000 jouls of heat in each second if we count the two circuits?

Finally an answer in another site, phew.

Thus, primary and secondary apparently not produce heat if almost all of the energy is transmitted, only the charge product it, so my reasoning was not correct.

[herm]

Greetings:
I am new to this site and am reposting the following which I have already posted on the QEG be-do.com site.
I am attaching two pdf documents.  Please read them in the following order:

1st pdf attachment (our first attempt to reverse engineer the QEG)
this posting
2nd pdf attachment (a description of our construction of a 1/4 scale version of the QEG)


Resonance Achieved!!
Development and Test of Mini-QEG
In this note, Mark and I (George, aka Herm), both electrical engineers continue into our investigation of the operating principals of the QEG. 
In our first PDF note, we reverse engineered the design of the QEG to the best of our abilities without having an actual working unit to test.  Since obtaining a full-sized core will take some time, we decided to build a smaller test device.  Our first attempt was revealed in a note describing a core fabricated from a metal tape-wound toroid with machined, clamp-on pole pieces.  This approach proved unusable because testing revealed the lack of sufficient magnetic coupling to the toroid to allow inductive modulation.  During the test, we discovered an unexpected 16 Mhz signal on the core resonance winding.  It was later discovered that this signal was emanating from the arcing of the DC motor carbon brushes.   The signal was being picked up by the core windings acting as a magnetic loop antenna.  We issued a note when this was discovered and then abandoned study of this device and constructed a new Mini-QEG.
Later, upon further contemplation, we realized that a signal of this type may have been used in the original QEG to energize the "exciter coil".  In the larger (1 HP) motor, brush arcing would produce a lower frequency signal, possibly around 1 Mhz.    The resonant "exciter coil" would pick up the signal and develop enough voltage to fire the spark gap providing a current pulse to the output winding thus polarizing the core and helping to initiate core resonance.  This possibility was demonstrated by firing a charged capacitor into the output winding of the operating mini-QEG producing a much larger output.  This effect could also be produced by using a bar magnet with one pole facing the shaft end of the mini-QEG effectively jump starting phase-locked resonance.  This resonance would continue after magnet removal.
See attached PDF  for details, schematics, and photos.