Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

Started by madddann, March 26, 2014, 09:42:27 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 54 Guests are viewing this topic.

MarkE

Quote from: Hope on May 10, 2014, 12:03:31 PM

Yes MarkE still trying as we all are,  hope to see your working device soon as well.  Have a good one!
Unlike you I have not made false claims to a perpetual motion machine.  Unlike you I have not raised money to pay for globetrotting trips by building up hopes to help the poor.  What I design works.

MarkE

Quote from: Hope on May 10, 2014, 01:13:17 PM

So you agree?  DC of course is not a pure energy it is a stored or created potential.  All DC storage units discharge. 
Hopeless Girl you are so FoS.
Quote


DC transmissions talk about limits due to wire gauge and resistance in the wire, yet how does that change when the same wire is used for AC transmission?   The problem is in the flawed DC theory,  not the wire.   Imbalance creates a need for nature to balance it and she DOES find a way (really many ways).
There is no flaw that you can point to in conventional analysis of either DC or AC circuits.  I bet you don't know that the AC resistance of a wire is greater than the DC resistance.  In terms of resistance a 30AWG wire is as good / as bad as a 12AWG wire at 1MHz.  At DC a 12AWG wire has about 1/64th the resistance of the same length of 30AWG wire.
Quote


How does Neuman get so much work done with so little amperage?  So if you are set to think work=amperage then you must justify all your beliefs based on this theory.
Current is neither energy nor power.  Current is the amount of charge passing through a cross-section per unit time.
Quote

   Lets admit it,  this box called IEEE training is flawed.
Let's admit the obvious:  You are a fraud and your fraud is now well exposed.  What is your exit strategy?
Quote

Yet all the believers must rail non-believers and this causes friction here and other (outside that box) forums. 
Any friction is a result of your continuous lying.
Quote


Even if you think watts=work load your going to have box limitations.
Watts are a measure of power, not energy.
Quote

  The closer truth is when you get a devices unseen forms or "spirits" moving then the physical follows.
Pixies do not run the universe.
Quote

But this is way outside the box limits for most to even accept as possible. 
Such ideas are rejected because they are unabated BS.
Quote


I know I just stepped into a pooh pile,  but until we are willing to get our minds open we will keep smacking our heads on the brick walls of "closed thinking systems".
You have no evidence to support your claims.  Open mindedness is about fairly evaluating evidence.  The only evidence that you present is of just how FoS you are.
Quote


The inertia of mass in motion,
Inertia is independent of speed.  A mass exhibits the same inertia whether completely at rest or moving 100,000 mph within its frame of reference.
Quote

speed of mass and the unstoppable force ideas are countered by the equal and opposite movements.
Wrong.  Newton's Laws correctly teach us that reaction force is a function of acceleration, not speed.
Quote

So all this "physical" matter can't be the only variables we need to work with,  so now we get to the label zero point energies.   Nice little package to box up and make unclear what was simply the exact opposite of physical matter. 
Does this BS come to you naturally, or do you work at cooking it up?
Quote


But naming it "the spirit of matter" causes bent attitudes.
The BS "it" does not exist.  If you think differently, show evidence.  So, far the only evidence you have shown is that your claims are false and that you have zero understanding of ordinary physics.
Quote

Just keep on keeping on then and like the phrase "do what you always have done and you will get what you always have got" will keep a sturdy little box.  Lets remember we want different results than what we have always gotten,  lets remember to be inventive without limiting the creative process.
You can wish for nature to be different than it is all you want.  Nature will be unmoved.
Quote

You can bet those who have had success have.   I may not be keeper of all knowledge but I am not the limiter of it either.
Quite the contrary:  You spew worthless nonsense to extract money from gullible people.  You are a loathsome individual.

MarkE

Quote from: F_Brown on May 10, 2014, 02:06:46 PM
I think you are misunderstanding what Joseph Neuman actually did.  With the little input power he put into his machine, he failed to extract and do any real work with the energy oscillating in the machine.   He never power anything with it.  He just show people meters displaying the oscillating voltage and current in the system, and that as I explained previously though my examples of tank circuit spice simulations, can be very misleading if interpreted carelessly.

Now with the QEG, I have found ways in simulation to extract significant power from the primary circuit and do useful work with it.  That the QEG is capable of that is clear to me.  The question that still remains is how much power needs to be applied to the rotor of the QEG to get that amount of power out of it.  So far the best efficiency any replicator has reported is 0.35, and even that was reported without any details about just how that figure was determined.

Could you ask the replicators to be more forthcoming with their data and methods?

***

Speaking of the IEEE do we have any members in the house.  I need a copy of a paper pulled.
Non members can buy papers.  Even members have to pay for most papers one way or another.

MarkE

Quote from: hartiberlin on May 10, 2014, 05:45:54 PM
Maybe it was meant good from Robitaille and Hopegirl to really bring something forward....
Maybe Robitaille  only did miscalculate his output power and in rushing this out they made
the mistakes by claiming something they never had also thinking they would have achieved the
same as the fake WITTS device, which does not work, cause it is powered by hidden 120 Volts AC wires...

The only way they still could maybe get OU is,
if they would try to use the
Aviso Konehead Coil Shorting Technolgy to chop the output current into spikes and then use the BackEMF to collect the
output energy via bridge rectifiers...

Only then you can violate the Lenz law and thus might get OU...
with the normal output coils as they have it now, you can not violate Lenz, as the output current
drags the rotor down...

I would highly advise the people experimenting with the QEG to try this.

Regards, Stefan.
Stefan:  Ismael Aviso is another liar just like Hopeless Girl.  He has apparently turned his attention to selling bottled water.  His various claimed energy inventions were all BS, as was his claims to having developed his own semiconductors.

F_Brown

Quote from: MarkE on May 10, 2014, 07:31:10 PM
Non members can buy papers.  Even members have to pay for most papers one way or another.

I thought if you paid the $100/yr membership fee or whatever it it now, you were able to get copies of archived papers at zero additional cost.

Anyway, I found my way to get by without it.  It still would be good to read it though.