Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[gravityblock]

Yes the mistake that I made and acknowledged further in the thread is that I failed to account for the integration.  Faster speed yields a higher di/dt, but T is proportionally smaller.

Can you provide a reference link or a reply # to where you acknowledged your mistake further in the thread, instead of just asserting as you normally do?  I'm unable to find this acknowledgement on your part, however I may have over looked it.

Thanks,

Gravock 

[centraflow]

To centraflow: I did read what you said.
Using an appropriate transmission, you can get almost any torque you want using a non-hydraulic motor. Only mentioning current as input to an electric motor is meaningless.
I watched that video; so similar to most OU motor/generator claims. No meaningful data. Obsession with showing RPMs. Large flywheel. Flickering meters. Lights as a load. No evidence of looping. Here is a question to consider for ALL OU systems: given that every stage in the system can be analysed for efficiency, and total system efficiency is a product of all individual efficiencies, why is the exact point that OU occurs is never identified?
Re: MarkE. I too found him unable/unwilling to just admit that he was wrong. Coming straight out and saying 'I was wrong; I apologise' can be a big deal to others. When (not if) I screw up, I'll say so. Which one of you all is qualified to give an opinion on Mark's mental health?

See the highlighted above, is not a hydraulic transmission "appropriate"? If the voltage input is constant, then any reduction in current input would result in a lower power input.


The flywheel as you call it is alluminium and holds the magnets, it is an external rotor, I pressume because they needed the space to mount the three phase heavy gauge coils which generate the power to drive the hydralic pump. The white, I presume off the shelf PM generator, is creating the final output. The design is interesting as the loop is in the drive, not from the final output generator, this leaves open several benifits of manipulating the power to the hydralic pump motor without affecting the output, what they are doing in reality I can not say at the moment, but I can guess.


As I have said in my first post here, I am waiting for an invite to see this first hand and just maybe it will not happen


As far as mental health is concerned, I am an industrial engineer with a B.Sc, but I don't think that qualifies me as a "quack", but it does not take much to see where some are coming from. Note my low post count!!!! but I have been a member here for many years, I wonder why my post count is so low


I think I will go back to my round table with real thinking people and have a few beers   just maybe we can be constructive and change the world for the better


regards


Mike


Sorry for distracting the thread from the real topic QEG


Here is something to leave you with to think about


Hydralic driven three phase generator with output converted to DC
PWM drive for hydralic pump at a frequency which is in reactive power sync, "hands apart", with the final output generator (no electrical link)
What do you think the output generator would do to the total drive?

[Khwartz]

Pretty much all the considerations you raise have been covered in the discussion with FarmHand.

Sometimes looks things to be repeated....

[MarkE]

Can you provide a reference link or a reply # to where you acknowledged your mistake further in the thread, instead of just asserting as you normally do?  I'm unable to find this acknowledgement on your part, however I may have over looked it.

Thanks,

Gravock

Look at Tuesday's posts about midday.

[Khwartz]

To centraflow: I did read what you said.
Using an appropriate transmission, you can get almost any torque you want using a non-hydraulic motor. Only mentioning current as input to an electric motor is meaningless.
I watched that video; so similar to most OU motor/generator claims. No meaningful data. Obsession with showing RPMs. Large flywheel. Flickering meters. Lights as a load. No evidence of looping. Here is a question to consider for ALL OU systems: given that every stage in the system can be analysed for efficiency, and total system efficiency is a product of all individual efficiencies, why is the exact point that OU occurs is never identified?
Re: MarkE. I too found him unable/unwilling to just admit that he was wrong. Coming straight out and saying 'I was wrong; I apologise' can be a big deal to others. When (not if) I screw up, I'll say so. Which one of you all is qualified to give an opinion on Mark's mental health?

Hi. If you like serious and regourous measurments about possible overunity COP, have a look on the work made on the Richard VIALLE's "autogen" / "autogénarateur".

Cheers.