Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[MileHigh]

Johan,

You are talking about myself and other people when you talk about shills and banning people.  Your comments are unacceptable.  Do you have any technical points to make to disagree with what I and others are saying?

The only thing we should be hearing from you is a discussion about the QEG project.

Take a look at this link:  http://be-do.com/index.php/en/forum/qeg-news/409-major-breakthrough-overunity-demonstrated

You see the title of the thread, "Major Breakthrough: Overunity Demonstrated."  There is a big problem Johan, the title of that thread is a LIE, even their own measurements show that it is a LIE.

Don't give me any more of your crap where you attempt to impugn my character and impugn the character of others around here.

MileHigh

[MarkE]

NO THE PROBLEM IS YOU NEED REACTIVE POWER IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN VOLTAGE LEVELS ON THE GRID. You missed the point entirely. You can not delivery real power with out reactive power. Industrial users are not billed in Watts but VA (apparent power) . Industrial users are incentivized to correct their power factor else they pay more like you say. Home users do not get penalized but with millions of homes with refrigeraters and other inductive loads this places an aggregated  burden on the grid system.  You might want to read up on it some time before saying I'm wrong! At least think before going off half cocked. But I see from the multitude of posts you make that that is not your style. 


Here's a place you might like to start.


http://www2.nationalgrid.com/uk/services/balancing-services/reactive-power-services/

That document refers to reactive current that the utility must absorb and release in order to keep the grid voltage stable in the face of reactive user loads. 

Your shouted claim: 

NO THE PROBLEM IS YOU NEED REACTIVE POWER IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN VOLTAGE LEVELS ON THE GRID.

Is at best imprecise.  The network must not collapse in the face of reactive loads.  That means that the network must absorb reactive customer currents.  A network that is completely non reactive and which has a suitably low, only real impedance can do that.

Your claim: 

You can not delivery real power with out reactive power.

Is simply and completely wrong.  An ideal transmission network appears completely resistive.  Uncompensated reactive loads are a practical matter that increase the burden on transmission networks.  Transmission networks have to put up reactive loads.  Reactive currents are not necessary and are undesirable.  They are tolerated.

[MarkE]

Would be great if they could stand up!
Do you know, maybe only ego/arm works, no idea YOU?
There choice, make my day!
Would be great, that nagging about every other from there arm-chair, but safe and easy hidden!?
So maybe nickname's should be banned, me you can find easy, why there fear, maybe most are stealing time from there boring job-Time, who nows!?
Thats clear and easy, but why not more builders, almost writing more than real-only marketing people, to defend but what ................ ?
Thats a good question: Why they have to write so bad over others, safe behind a nicky without own works or proof, just typing and typing new kind of ee, eee, ieee Bible's?

Would be nice to understand this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ckpQW9sdUg


Regards, Johan

The Leyden jar demonstration is very simple:  The charge and energy is stored across the dielectric of the beaker walls.  The conductive cups carry the charge in the external circuit. 

[TinselKoala]

(snip)
I just Googled "resonant transformer ring" and came up with this interesting snipet: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resonant_inductive_coupling  Lots of Tesla references.

That article is hilarious. Good, and bad. It's informative but I find it funny.  I am laughing really hard at the image they chose to include to illustrate resonant inductive coupling. The image is titled "Resonant inductive coupling experiment conducted by CT&T Laboratories, december 2012, 13 inch transmission distance.jpg", reproduced below.

Compare their ugly bulky apparatus lighting a few LEDs, made in December of 2012, with what I show with my resonant inductive coupling system in this video below, made in July of 2012:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LaVmTeaU4Io

By the way... the circulating reactive or resonant power in the transmission loop of my apparatus is quite amazing. James Robitaille would be measuring p-p voltages of 200 volts and currents of 10-20 amps in the loop. But I'm only applying 12 VDC at a maximum of 5 amps or so on the input. Therefore: We have attained Resonance! And we have _massive_ Overunity! Please send me twenty thousand dollars so I can string a wire from the receiver over to the transmitter input and remove the battery!!

[TinselKoala]

Mechanically vibrating the core laminations by electromechanical resonance is a Loss Mechanism. Also a Damage Mechanism. Good luck with that. It's definitely NOT going to help the "bottom line" energetically... but as another Red Herring, it will help keep the Vacation Fund solvent.