Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[PCB]

Some folks here might find of this earlier request for money interesting:

http://cultureofawareness.com/2013/07/20/hopegirl-urgent-plea-for-help/

She has been at this for some time:

http://2012thebigpicture.wordpress.com/2013/09/11/we-did-it-power-to-the-people-free-energy-is-on-the-way/   15 KW generator not the QEG. What ever happened to this one?

Shame she did not bother to get an engineering degree, but that would have gotten in the way anyway.

Whow this really is a subculture thing looking at the myriad of posting and videos. She certainly has a real talent for promotion! I also suspect she is beating Jamie with a stick to make the bloody thing work. "don't you know my reputation is on the line god dammit!" He was looking a bit stressed in the latest photos. Oh know I'm a troll!

[Acca]

 Here is my response to the QEG.. and it's now a public forum.. Thanks !!

Tinsel Koala...this one is for the best response..

Kudos to you !!  BTW this is my clip...below..


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1R2-lFtJOmU

and a Tesla AC motor.. below..

Acca..

And now for some fun !! below !!

Note about magnetostrictive terfenol-D steel and Garfenol steel...

New magnetostrictive material captures minute amounts of energy from vibrations and other physical phenomena to make possible new kinds of energy-harvesting schemes


Galfenol energy-harvester designs also have magnetic considerations. Galfenol needs a permanent magnet to supply magnetic bias and, in so doing, maximize changes in flux density. Other components which make up the magnetic circuit include high-flux-density magnetic return paths and air gaps. The goal is to maximize the changing magnetic flux in the Galfenol, so designers should minimize air gaps and pay particular attention to the overall efficiency of the magnetic circuit.
The changing magnetic flux is converted to useful electrical energy via a wire-wound coil. Voltage induced in a coil from a changing flux density is given by Faraday's law:

http://machinedesign.com/news/designing-galfenol


Tunable magnetoelectric resonance devices

http://iopscience.iop.org/0022-3727/42/12/122001/fulltext/


http://www.jonasr.com/terfenol-d.html
sound of megnetoelectric resonance speakers driven by "TERFENOL-D"
http://www.jonasr.com/music/bortgangexcerpt.mp3

[MileHigh]

Well if we are going to dig down low one can say that there is a "free energy cottage industry" and there are the "supporters of the free energy cottage industry" and that means there is a big annual revenue pie out there and you can compete for it too!  Whether it be selling DVDs or hosting conferences or crowd funding or you are Mr. Queue-Moe-Gen in Moldavia.  I suppose that you could widen the definition and throw in the "magic pills and magic devices and magic water" industry and include the magnetic wristband people and ilk like that.

If you want to be cynical, you rationalize that all that you have to do is make a pitch, and if you are skilled and lucky then you might get your slice of the annual revenue pie for this year.

Seeing that older blogpost from HopeGirl where she is begging people to pay her rent and her cell phone bill is gross.  To me that is glorified panhandling.  So it's possible, or it would seem, that HopeGirl has been "playing the field" to tap into the supporters of the free energy cottage industry.  You make a pitch and hope for a score.

Now she is attempting to demonize myself and others that are just commenting on what's going on, just ordinary people surfing the net and looking at the pitches.  The Fix the World gang make it so easy to point out the fallacy of what's going on.

The "technical group" at FTW is between a rock and a hard place also.  Fortunately, in this realm, if you don't know your stuff then you are going to be outed by people that do know their stuff.  Like I stated before, it's like people that are just learning a new language.  It only takes a few seconds when you speak to someone to quickly realize that their English skills are limited.  Hence James Robitaille quickly falling from "technical grace" by presenting his data and findings.  Rick Friedrich of the Bee-Deenie crowd fell from "technical grace" like a stone several years ago when I watched one or two of his clips.

That's the way the cookie crumbles.

To the QEG builders and the Be-Do forum enthusiasts:  You have to realize that the majority of the people discussing the QEG and the promoters of the QEG on this thread are just real, normal people.  For many of you, your gut instinct surely must be telling you this.  The rant from HopeGirl is nonsense.  That's just the way it is.   Many of you have spent time and money on this, sorry, but it's just not so.  You have built a laughable generator that produces more thermal heat energy than it produces useful electrical output.  The entire project is bogus.  Don't be enslaved by the peer pressure of the rabid believers.  Speak your mind.  Shake off the Orwellian overtones that are coming from within your own peer group.

MileHigh

[MileHigh]

Here is a great technical posting from Simon Derricutt from Revolution-Green:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.

Reference https://hopegirl2012.files.wor... here are some back-of-envelope calculations.With the measured 7kV peak voltage (half the pk-pk) the energy stored in the primary coil/capacitor would be 0.5CV² and thus around 4.09J. We're feeding it somewhat less than 600J/s. I don't know the efficiency here, but given overall efficiency of less than 40% we could estimate this feed rate of somewhere around 240J/s. We can thus get oscillation built up in around 1/60 second. If we take that 4J or so out, then the oscillation is stopped and will need to be rebuilt. Given that the primary is oscillating at about 168.4Hz, we can get the energy out of it in about 1/4 cycle or 1/674 of a second or 1.48ms. 4.09J in 1.48ms is a rate of 2755W.
That 2.8kW rate James is quoting is therefore just about right here, but he's missing something. It's only 2.8kW or so for a fraction of the time, with the rest of the time the oscillations having to rebuild and to restore the energy in the oscillations. Over 1 second he's only getting that 240J out, since he can only pull around 4J 60 times in a second.
In reality, we won't actually be building the oscillation energy to a peak and then taking all of it at once, and instead a small percentage will be taken out of each cycle. Because of the energy storage, though, the peak rate of 2.8kW could be achieved. It just can't be sustained, since if you try that you don't build up the energy. A standard photographic flash-gun can take in mW of power and output a few kW, but still won't output more joules than is put into it.
Note that the 240J, and thus the 2.8kW, are only a rough estimate, and the real figures could be double or half this quite easily. It won't however be more than the 607Wrms he's feeding in.
I don't think James or FTW will accept this calculation, and will continue to think that they can pull out more than they put in. It will however become obvious when the transverter fails to do what they say it will.

[Pirate88179]

As far as the "newb" label and that whole discussion.... I think the stimulus was when a poster, identified as a "newbie" due to low post count and recent join-up date, poked some fun at MarkE, who indeed is one of the most knowledgeable and evidently well-educated EE-type critical posters around.  Then Bill pointed out in his post that perhaps a newcomer might not be fully acquainted with MarkE's level of experience and qualifications. That's all there is to that. If MarkE isn't ruffled by someone calling him ignorant about EE topics when that's false, why should someone else get ruffled about being called a newbie when that's true?

Bingo!  100% correct and totally right on.  EXACTLY what I meant.  I have nothing to add to your words TK as this was almost word for word my response.

Thanks,

Bill