Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[Pirate88179]

After 5 1/2 years as a noob I just got promoted to Jr. Member. Celebrating with a beer. Obviously got the posting bug which will be surely be cured when the QEG dies its eventual death.

@MileHigh

Nice find! I highlighted this issue several pages ago (though not as thoroughly), but this is at least scripted in terms of some calcs. With effort you can probably calculate where all the input energy is going given some of the other areas of loss previously identified.

When the QEG gig crashes and burns hop Girl we simply glum onto the next free energy invention. This could be a real business opportunity for a talented and motivated builder here from  this forum. It does not have to actually work, just spin some electrons. You know you will have the support of this forum until the trolls wake up and beat you with the club of truth.

Congratulations on the promotion.  I meant no offense other than to attempt to point out (as TK so eloquently put it) that Mark, aside from being very well educated in the electronics field, has been very helpful here and shares his knowledge freely with us. 

If you had just appeared on the scene and did not know this, it would be understandable.  There are a lot of these smart guys here who, over the years, have busted and exposed many frauds in the OU field.  Some folks do not like the truth....others can't handle the truth but, I have never seen any of these smart guys do anything but attempt to explain electronics, proper testing procedures and expose scams.  These scams hurt all of us interested in energy research.  I too, was once a "newbie" here and I surely did not intend to cast dispersions on all newbies.  I have no idea what the hell that other fellow was going off about.

I have learned a lot from these fellows over the years and I am grateful that they share their knowledge with us.

Bill

[PIH123]

If one of their donors complains I wonder if this would be considered mail fraud? I might be a bit worried if I were them.

I hope their donors are not smart enough to use google, or they might find

http://www.ip-adress.com/whois/fixtheworldproject.net




But, on a positive note, they could also stumble across this

http://www.stik.com/p/financial+planning/massachusetts.salem/p/naima.feagin

which yields :
"I cannot say enough good things about my beloved wife - she is one of the hardest workers I know, quite intelligent and very qualified in financial analysis."


followed by a facebook link to the above person which reveals someone into wearing skirts and thigh length leather boots. (pictures 1, 3, 7 and 8 of  
Not that there is anything wrong with that.
But good for a chuckle nonetheless.

[MileHigh]

You assume that there might be idealistic QEG newbies lurking here and they might not have a sense of scale.  Some emo chicks with blue hair!  lol

We just learned from Simon Derricutt that there are about 4 joules of energy circulating in the primary resonant tank circuit.  All that impressive sounding high voltage and there are four measly joules.  What does that mean?

If you had a standard 1/4 watt resistor between your thumb and forefinger, and 4 joules of energy went into the resistor in a one-half second pulse, you might just feel a brief warming sensation for a second.  Then the 4 joules would then be gone.

How about a humble carbon-zinc AA battery, how many joules in it?   The answer is about 1270 joules.

http://www.allaboutbatteries.com/Energy-tables.html

So it seems impressive, with all that high voltage and the "limbo" inductor, but the amount of energy circulating in the LC tank is actually very small.

Think about that in the context of the claimed 10 kilowatt output.  10 kilowatts is 10,000 joules per second, every second continuously.

What's the frequency of the LC resonator?  A few hundred hertz?  4 joules in the resonator bouncing back and forth a few hundred times every second and there is a claimed output of 10,000 joules per second.

The numbers I quoted above don't compute.  I just named a few data points to give you a sense of perspective.

Here is the perspective you should be thinking about:  600 watts in, a measly 4 joules circulating in the LC tank, and let's be generous and say 300 watts out electrical, and 300 watts out of heat.

In very abstract terms (for the artistically inclined), if you can imagine the flow of power being like a flowing river, you start off with one main flow.  The main flow is the source.  You see the water flowing by and that represents the flow of power.  The river splits into two big branches, the "Red River Heat" and the "Blue River Electro."   So where is the LC resonator in this scheme of things?  The LC resonator is like a tiny permanent whirlpool at the river junction.  Most of the river water flows past the tiny whirlpool and doesn't even take notice.

Somehow, that little whirlpool along with "something" is supposed to create a new river flow that's 10 times the size of the existing river and it's two tributaries.  You need Cecil B. DeMille to make that happen, but those days are gone!  It's all CGI nowadays - not real.

MileHigh

[Angelic]

http://www.gofundme.com/phase3qeg

[TinselKoala]

FTW has freely created this video with the QEG engineering artist James Robitaille exemplifying how overunity is measured in the QEG. The cost of the equipment needed to test the power in the QEG core and provide these measurements and the accompanying report would be nearly $75,000, and was lovingly lent to the project so that we could show these measurements freely to the people.

ORLY? Seventy five thousand dollars? Come, let us do a bit of research.

The most expensive item of test kit they have is the Tek TDS3054 digital oscilloscope. These are available on the used market for between 5 and 7 thousand dollars. Fully refurbished with current NIST-traceable calibration, including passive probes, for under 12,000.

The 1000:1 high voltage probe is probably next on the "cost" list. This item comes in at just under 2 thousand dollars.

The Stangenes 10:1 current transformer .... I can't find the exact cost of that item with a casual search but others of the same kind by other manufacturers are under 200 dollars... some "well under" like 35 dollars.

The Kill-a-Watt meter is under 100 dollars.

Did I leave anything out? Oh...yes.... sorry. Six 100 Watt light bulbs...... a dollar each.


No matter how I add those items up I don't get anywhere near 75,000 dollars. Maybe I should be using peak-to-peak values.....