Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[TinselKoala]

Yep, i have found the missing link !  The rotor should be made of a magnet and then the
fun begins. It looks like a one to one copy of patent 4904926.
called 'magnetic motion electric generator'.

And skip all shill messages from
'farmhand'
milehigh' ,
Khwartz,
TinselKoala,
Pirate88179,
Mark E,

to name a few ! Heromembers ? The opposite !

ROFL!

You have no credibility here, Eniac5state. You have produced nothing of your own and you have zero insight into what is actually going on. And you cannot refute anything that any of the people you mention have said, with checkable outside references, valid facts or demonstrations of your own.

Why don't you take your "suggestion" over to the QEG forum sites and tell _them_ that they should be using a magnet for their rotors? 

Of course.... that would be like telling someone who is building a bicycle that they should build a locomotive instead.

Not only that... but also, you are WRONG about the patent number you list! Anyone who looks at the drawings and claims can see for themselves that the QEG is NOT a "one to one copy" of that patent, even if you substitute a magnet for the laminated rotor of the QEG.

You think there are "shills" on this forum? You apparently don't even know the definition of "shill"... because YOU are one.

[F_Brown]

I've seen several times questions raised as to whether Jamie is an electrical engineer, mostly I think by MH. I've seen at least one reference by HopeGirl to her step-dad being an electronics engineer, not specifically an electrical engineer. For those who have not studied electrical engineering you might ask what is the difference? OK so I'm an electronic and an electrical engineer, a EEE.  I studied both subjects together.  I did my degree in the UK where it is usually to do both. However, out of a class of about 100 students or so only 4 specialized in electrical engineering in our final year, the remainder of us went down the electronics path. In the US, at the risk of over generalizing here, I would say it is more usual to study in depth only one or the other. So you get EEs. Electronic or electrical engineers. I would say (except for a few that do rf design) that for the most part electronic engineers live in a DC world, while electrical engineers an AC world.  Incidentally, AC power machines, transformers, etc are something of a black art to design, and theory only gets you so far.

As someone who has invested some years into the study of transformer design and has had numerous conversations with commercial transformer winders I know this to be true.

I would not be surprised if Jamie originally miss measured the power output of his prototype machine because he is a DC power guy, not an AC power guy. Unfortunately he is now stuck between QEG and a hard place!

Since Jamie has apparently worked for companies like ShopVac involved in some capacity with motor design and testing, I believe he is familiar with rotational AC machines.  I will however stop short of speculating any further on why he is doing and saying the things he is, because it's already been well established there are only two possibilities, ignorance and deception, and in view of his work history ignorance seems the less likely.

I've read articles that say there is now a big movement in the EE work these days away from analog AC stuff into digital DC stuff, and that this is creating a relative scarciity in competently trained analog engineers, because our institutions of higher education have all but stopped teaching it.  I learned what I know about the nitty-gritty of the design and actual winding of low frequency power transformers and audio output transformers from hard to find material published in the 40's and 50's.  For the most part, this particular field, laminated core low frequency transformers, stopped evolving decades ago, and now just follows well established although closely held guide lines that were determined through a horrendous amount of trial and error work over the years.

[ACG]

The mysticism has no bounds.

No point in inserting the facebook source since I cannot read its link due to not being a member of its gangship.  Here is the relink:
http://be-do.com/index.php/en/forum/qeg-news/443-comment-to-ftw-about-transverter

"Dear Hopegirl Just want you to know that you are on the right track and that their are already many people using free energy devices out here. Please tell Jamie that the transverter or what we call the diode extraction plug is the correct device for extracting the radiant or reactive power from the QEG!"


What part of that is amazing?  Do you know what amazing would have been, to have provided any approach path FROM DAY ONE.  But no..... This amazing advise just so happens to come months later and only AFTER word of a transverter to be made and come in the wake of the 3rd phase funding campaign.  Well which is it, radiant or reactive?  Now on narrative #4.

In narrative order:
1. Output of 240v 42 amps 60hz  (from manual 03-25-2014).
2. Output of 2000v 5 amps 400hz (from Taiwan interviews starting @4:40 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atLN-mkmqBE notice James said "if")
3. Output of 1400v lower amps due to not over unity yet 200hz, and may need an aerial? (Morocco)
4. Output to be supplemented with a transverter to draw power from reactivity of the primary coil (to be done in United Kingdom http://hopegirl2012.wordpress.com/2014/05/25/qeg-3rd-phase-development-self-running/).

Note that in narrative #1 the quantum exciter coil's function was "to provide a conduction path through the quantum field (zero point) into the
generator core." - page 2 http://hopegirl2012.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/qeg-user-manual-3-25-14.pdf 

Equally note the exciter coil was not used in Morocco from where the variations of over unity were said to been measured. 
Report: https://hopegirl2012.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/morocco-qeg-june-2014-test-and-measurement-report-v2-011.pdf,
- section 3.1.1, "the exciter circuit had not yet been included"
- section 3.1.2 table 7, Exciter coil No for primary coil and No for secondary coil
- section 3.2.1, "At this stage the system was tested without the exciter coil"  That test result reported Reactive Power of 22.8kVAR pk-pk / 2050kVAR RMS 

[ACG]

Thanks for answering the points. It would appear that having the proper, accurate, laser-cut laminations is going to be critical for any builders if they want to get this kind of tight clearance. I'm surprised at the accuracy, frankly. With that kind of care and precision taken with the laminations, it's surprising that the rest of the QEG design is so flaky.

So, if you, or someone else, did have a rotor crash, do you think it would cause unrepairable damage to rotor/stator laminations, bearing mount holes, etc? I can envision a couple loose fasteners at the bearing mounts allowing the shaft to drift over a bit, and then a lot of banging and jumping about....

You have to remember, qeg team has no bearing on the fabrication of the metal parts.  You can thank Torelco for that.

[memoryman]

Could the mysterious post have come from Hypegirl herself? Sort of self promotion? Would she stoop that low?