Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[isim]

@F-Brown
Here is: 10ms sim, with as initials conditions:
Speed=6000rpm
Rp=2000ohms  Rs=2Mohms
VCO=7.5KV   ICO=0  I

[TinselKoala]

Very nice! You got the secondary's voltage peaks folding back just as in JR's "Morocco Overunity" shots. MileHigh will be pleased to hear the explanation for these "double peaks".

[isim]

@TinselKoala
It's d/dt of the flux linkage of the "output" coils '(here.without load).
In the no alignement configuration, the d/dt of the flux is lesser and give these "double peaks".
But why it's only visible 1 time on 2 ?
Because F primary is 1/2 of F secondary. The double pic signal is only visible when max(IPrimary) coïncide with max(Vsecondary), this is only 2 time in one cycle.
So is the QEG geometry. (and for me bad geometry, so bad efficiency!)
Good picture later with better time resolution....
And don't forget this sim is with a constant speed (6000rpm), a load (2000ohms) in the HT coil ("primary", 2*3100Turns) and no load on the low voltage (2*350 turns) coils, juste to compare with the good simulation of F_Brown posr: http://www.overunity.com/14443/quantum-energy-generator-qeg-open-sourced-by-hopegirl/msg406095/#msg406095.
@+

[Farmhand]

The Be-Doers and the QEG proponents need to understand the difference between "reactive power" in the sense of the power sent back to the grid, and "activity" in a tank, which is stored in the device and remains active in the device and dissipating energy at our expense not the grid supply power company's expense.

Reactive Power (power grid sense of the term) = power exiting the residence and returned along the lines back to some part of the grid.

Reactive power or Activity, (activity in a tank sense of the term) = Power stored in oscillation between L and C within the device. So the power supply (grid) does not see that as reactive power, and to the grid or energy meter the power factor could be close to 1.0 because not much energy is being returned to the grid. Instead it is being stored in the L/C tank and dissipating energy at our expense.

eg. I can run my spark gap Tesla coil at a power factor of over 0.95 while there is no output except noise, light (from streamers), radiations and heat. 

So if the difference between those two can be explained and understood then it would go a long way to fixing their thinking flaws.

All power released from a "reactor" is "reactive power", per se.

It would be far more efficient to just rewind the QEG core as a transformer and use it as one. Could get over 90% efficiency.

OK Power Factor and transformers is a way to explain it, with an efficient power transformer at idle (unloaded) the power factor is very low because the phase is "away from 0.0 degrees "towards 90 degrees. The idle power consumed is only a small fraction of the power applied. As the load is increased the phase becomes closer to 0.0 degrees and a greater % of the applied power is consumed so the power factor is increased ( meaning the reactive power is reduced in %). And the device is more efficient because at idle there is no output.

Basically the tank circuit stores energy in the device and dissipates some at our expense, Alternatively allowing reactive power back to the grid stores it in the grid and the expense is more theirs. Although we pay for all losses anyway in our billings.

Now without the oscillating power figures what do they have as a team. Nothing much at all.

They might as well go to Tesla's grave and spit on it, they do him a great injustice. And continue to do so. So it's like returning to spit on his grave every day. Despicable behavior.

Fess up or the Karma will get you James, Tell Hope Girl to find another revenue stream. The risk is jail time, think about it.

.

[ACG]

qeg in UK coming soon.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mrMDAPTiegc

Notice the same m.o.  Filming the arrival of parts just like in Taiwan and Morocco.  Who other than those reaping the benefits of free money care about a truck or van rolling up a driveway unloading a box?  I know I know, going for the whole realism aspect.

I have some advise to cut down on the building time.  Since July is when the qeg team should be heading back to Morocco, instead of starting over from scratch a 3rd time, why not just use the core assembly from Morocco?  Or one of the two that was done in Taiwan.  Oh here is a good one.  How about using the prototype from Pennsylvania!  That way you can skip all the building and all the transverting because the PA qeg is a running working quantum energy over unity generator.
[insert some hours some VARS and some Vpp]