Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

Started by madddann, March 26, 2014, 09:42:27 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 115 Guests are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

Quote from: isim on July 03, 2014, 05:33:29 PM
@TinselKoala
I think know why you get a discrepancy between the measurement of power in and power out.
The current multimeter is giving a false reading, because the current from the battery to the amplifier("generator") is pulsed and this dvm "does not see all the signal".
   - And a simple capacitive filter between the multimeter and amplifier will cure the problem.
Can-you send me the amplifier schematic or it's reference if it's a commercial one?
Just to justify my ideas.
Thank-you.
@+


HI isim
Thanks again for taking a look at my data.
I'll post the results of the new tests in a little while, after doing some household chores. I'll also post the schematic of the circuit I'm using. Since the inductances I am working with are so small, physical layout is also going to be important for the tank part of the circuit and inserting the measurement resistor in there may not be the best way to do the measuring.

I'll also determine the waveform of the DC input and smooth it if necessary. Meanwhile, you may be interested in looking at these videos from Poynt99, concerning the DMMs accuracy when measuring pulsed signals:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2KhGpmXPjc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXTbcToC5T4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=70sPnpG2JO4

PCB

It's interesting my last post at be-do was also completely ignored where I pointed folks to the results of the "German" QEG simulation matching the oscilloscope output from Morocco. Vgray, the techno fantasist and essay writer, normally comes right back with a comment. He chose this time to steer well clear.  It's interesting that  the two most recent postings are his and he has chosen to ignore mine. I think I will make an explicit offer to ship the Penn QEG prototype on my own buck.  Also a lot of these guys posting at be-do are ostriches, with their head down researching materials, etc, and not looking at the broader horizon where they would clearly see that this whole thing is a giant con.

I changed the title of my posting http://be-do.com/index.php/en/forum/welcome-mat/490-pennsylvania-qeg-prototype-ship-to-the-uk

MileHigh

It's still Year Zero in Queegeeland.  Soon you will have to queue up for toilet paper.

TinselKoala

@isim:
I've confirmed that the input power to my system is straight DC. I connected a current viewing resistor in-line with the battery supply and scoped it: total flat-line DC without any ripple or spikes. The input current is DC at the value shown on the DMMs.

isim

Hi TimselKoala,
This is intriguing!
Ok, may be you already have a capacitor at the input of your Amplifier!

I know these DVM's test video, it's a good job. But with pulse you can have & saturation in the input stage, witch give bad measurement.

I intend to simulate all your system, if you agree, so I need a very detailed information on it.
Thank-you,
@+