Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

Started by madddann, March 26, 2014, 09:42:27 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 100 Guests are viewing this topic.

MarkE

Quote from: TinselKoala on July 26, 2014, 11:39:15 PM
So what's wrong now with just using the Ohmite 0.25 ohm stack as I have used it? It does produce some droop in the voltage but that is acceptable at this point, since it doesn't overheat very rapidly like I thought it would based on earlier experiments.

Meanwhile, here's another video update, showing what the QEG people have never, to my knowledge, been able to show from their constructions: running a motor from the output of the microQEG, with full and efficient RPM control.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkXrhRqlQE4

Those slackers! If they can't run a motor off their output, how are they ever going to get to self-looping? Are they tearing their hair (what's left of it) out right now? Or, perhaps they are working feverishly day and night, getting "resonance in the power band" over and over, reading those FAQs on be-do, yet flicking the switch and watching their baby die, deader than a doorknob, each and every time they try it.
The resistance that you insert alters the phase angle.  0.25 Ohms against jwL = 8 Ohms is about a 3 degree distortion.  0.25 Ohms is about 6W dissipation per resistor at 7A rms.  That's a lot of stress to impose on sub 1W resistors.

TinselKoala

Quote from: MarkE on July 27, 2014, 12:09:12 AM
The resistance that you insert alters the phase angle.  0.25 Ohms against jwL = 8 Ohms is about a 3 degree distortion.  0.25 Ohms is about 6W dissipation per resistor at 7A rms.  That's a lot of stress to impose on sub 1W resistors.

The resistors are 5 watt resistors, aren't they? WNER50FE

And at 11 Amps p-p, that is only about 3.9 A rms, isn't it?

http://www.learningaboutelectronics.com/Articles/Voltage-rms-calculator.php

;)

Farmhand

Quote from: TinselKoala on July 26, 2014, 11:39:15 PM
So what's wrong now with just using the Ohmite 0.25 ohm stack as I have used it? It does produce some droop in the voltage but that is acceptable at this point, since it doesn't overheat very rapidly like I thought it would based on earlier experiments.

Meanwhile, here's another video update, showing what the QEG people have never, to my knowledge, been able to show from their constructions: running a motor from the output of the microQEG, with full and efficient RPM control.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkXrhRqlQE4

Those slackers! If they can't run a motor off their output, how are they ever going to get to self-looping? Are they tearing their hair (what's left of it) out right now? Or, perhaps they are working feverishly day and night, getting "resonance in the power band" over and over, reading those FAQs on be-do, yet flicking the switch and watching their baby die, deader than a doorknob, each and every time they try it.

Ahah TK, there is the only useful output is the motor or light bulb or other intended useful output. (The reason for the input in a real world situation) is the useful intended output. So what is the DC power output to the motor (just roughly).  ;)

And the unloaded and loaded input powers ?

Cheers

TinselKoala

Quote from: Farmhand on July 27, 2014, 12:47:05 AM
Ahah TK, there is the only useful output is the motor or light bulb or other intended useful output. (The reason for the input in a real world situation) is the useful intended output. So what is the DC power output to the motor (just roughly).  ;)

And the unloaded and loaded input powers ?

Cheers

The loaded and unloaded input powers can be seen in the video above.

But why are you demanding more from me, than the world is demanding from FTW QEG, James Robitaille and all the rest of the QEG teams around the world? I have already shown you much more than any of them have done, and I haven't even gotten a cheezburger for it. While the FTW people have spent, all told, something like half a million dollars and still haven't even run a motor on their outputs.

I'll tell you what. As soon as any of the big QEG teams demonstrates valid output measurements while their QEG powers a motor (not the other way around), I'll show the power output measurements from the TKTransverter powering MY motor. Fair enough?

8)

TinselKoala

OK, let's do a quick review.

The MicroQEG produces pure sine wave outputs of current and voltage, so the equation Vrms * Irms * cos(phase angle) = Real Power is valid.
The FTW QEG.... not so much.

The MicroQEG is designed to oscillate at around 300-350 kHz... and it does, and plugging the measured values of its tank L and C into the resonant frequency equation yields X, Z, and F values that correspond with standard theory to within a few percent. And of course the performance (resonant frequency) is just as predicted.
The FTW QEG is supposed to resonate at 400 Hz, but every build we have seen resonates at between 90 and 150 Hz.

The MicroQEG has been demonstrated to be fully capable of driving a standard, commutated, DC motor with full speed control.
The FTW QEGs have never been shown to power anything other than light bulbs.

The MicroQEG is silent, except when driving its motor.
The FTW QEG.... not so much.

The MicroQEG is economical, compact, portable and safe to operate.
The FTW QEG... not so much.

The MicroQEG destroys about three dollars in parts if it should fail and "melt down" due to operator error. These parts are readily available world wide and are easily replaced.
The FTW QEG.... should the potted windings short out as many have already done, the whole thing becomes a big lump of useless mass and will cost thousands of dollars to restore to "functionality".

But.... the FTW QEG produces "Overunity in VARs!" by the principle of mechanically pumped parametric oscillation (the only conceivable link to anything Nikola Tesla ever patented).
The MicroQEG uses an ordinary type of auto-resonating oscillator that does not need varying parameters to work, and produces exactly the same kind of "evidence" for OU that the FTW QEG does: "Overunity in VARs!"  Furthermore the principle of extracting real power from this "OU in VARs" is clearly demonstrated by the MicroQEG and its matching TKTransverter, running the DC motor with full control. All we have that corresponds to this from FTW QEGs is the report from Florida, with no real measurements attached, and the usual light bulb loads. And of course the MicroQEG uses another, much less obscure Tesla patent, the Bifilar Primary Winding, disposed in a cylindrical form.