Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[Farmhand]

Now this is interesting, I'm glad you asked me to do the experiment again TK, I couldn't work out what was going on as I was
making the video but noticed the phases looked odd for the load and the tank. I worked out later why .... [Resonance] ! Looks
like the light globe is almost resonant and it's inductance is causing a quite reactive filament light globe.  Lucky I didn't blow it.
Light globe and clip lead had a cold inductance of 58 uH.

Check the the two power traces they are all labeled, "tank loaded" - "globe loaded" ect. and the last figure for the load is
almost round  .

Attached is a Zip file of the Jpegs I saved from the computer during video part 2.

Here is the first part of the video (setup fine tune and some scope phases loaded and unloaded and input shown.

Test 1Globe load reactive power Part 1 :-)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5mLALutgqCc

Video part 2 Shows load phase and power ect.

Test 1- 2 Globe load reactive power Part 2 :-)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDs128Q64lc
..

P.S. I'll post the two scope shots showing-
1) The loaded output tank voltage, current and power.
2) The load voltage, current and power.
Globe inductance cold is 58 uH. 
..
.

[TinselKoala]

Wow! Look at that math trace, it is approaching +/- symmetry. When you can get that thing perfectly symmetrical and still have a brilliant bulb, that will be something that will make the QEG folks stand up and take notice, I think.

I've noticed with my wireless power transmission systems that the receiver bulb can often be much brighter than the same bulb is when connected directly to the battery powering the transmitter. I haven't bothered to explore this phenomenon other than to note it and demonstrate it in several different instances. Also my WP systems exhibit what we have been calling "Supernova Mode" where the thing will abruptly switch into a mode where the bulb is much brighter and also the received power does not show the expected 1/r² distance dependence, over a short span.

In the "normal" mode as the receiver is moved away the received power decreases and also the input power to the transmitter decreases. In Supernova Mode as the receiver is moved away the received power doesn't decrease and the input power to the transmitter increases. It is as if a more direct link between transmitter and receiver is in effect. Near-field direct EM coupling, instead of broadcast and received power? Truly resonant load including the bulb filament? I dunno but the issue is an interesting one and probably should be explored.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LaVmTeaU4Io

[MarkE]

It's near field effects.

[TinselKoala]

It's near field effects.

Of course. But as someone else once said, simply naming a thing does not explain it. It's an effect, it happens in a field, when nearby. Ergo, near field effect.  Heads nod sagely, sound of pencils scribbling in notebooks, one solitary hand rises from the back of the room.... "Yes, you there in the back, you have a question?"

[MarkE]

Of course. But as someone else once said, simply naming a thing does not explain it. It's an effect, it happens in a field, when nearby. Ergo, near field effect.  Heads nod sagely, sound of pencils scribbling in notebooks, one solitary hand rises from the back of the room.... "Yes, you there in the back, you have a question?"

Where are the donuts?  We were promised donuts...

Seriously, id you want to dive deeper then one thing that you can do is to drop the carrier frequency down.  This will extend the distance where you are in the near field and should make it easier to get consistent near field behavior.