Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[PCB]

Changing subject a little bit, and getting back to reactive power, have you guys see this video (may have already been posted here, but was posted on be-do recently):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUChl7zRzTA


Actually this might be their patent http://www.google.com/patents/WO2011101512A1?cl=es

They use the definition power = VIQ where Q is the quality factor X/R. In the demo they power a bunch of fluorescence lights, and capture the reactive power produced by the load and convert it to real power driving a separate parallel string of incandescent lamps.  I've not sure what the Q of an fluorescence light is?

Did some digging and found this rather old patent http://www.google.com/patents/US4717995, not sure if there is any relevancy other than being by the same inventor.

and this http://electricpowermultiplier.blogspot.com/

and it seems this device may have been discussed here back in December last year http://www.overunity.com/14106/reactive-power-reactive-generator-research-from-gotoluc-discussion-thread/180/#.VEc1TfldUzo

Looks like Evan has flown out to meet these guys https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.744719685584790.1073741831.680750941981665&type=1 Some good shots here of what is inside the big box.

[MarkE]

Changing subject a little bit, and getting back to reactive power, have you guys see this video (may have already been posted here, but was posted on be-do recently):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUChl7zRzTA

They use the definition power = VIQ where Q is the quality factor X/R. In the demo they power a bunch of fluorescence lights, and capture the reactive power produced by the load and convert it to real power driving a separate parallel string of incandescent lamps.  I've not sure what the Q of an fluorescence light is?

Their "discovery" is that they can bamboozle people by ignoring vector math.  It's pathetic.
For a pure sine wave source, the "old knowledge" of P_REAL = V*I*cos(theta) happens also to be absolutely correct.  Their "discovery" where they declare P = V*I*|Z_L|/R is nonsense.

[ACG]

Throughout this entire boondoggle both James and Hopefunds have put on the air of the unreachable rock star. More so on James's behalf. Brings up the questions if James is real or CGI. We can get a hold even if just by computer and see the presence of Mark Dansie, Zerofossilfuel, RWG, and a host of other energy enthusiast See their comments, post on forums, and recordings. But James, no...... You get to see him once every 30 days. When you do, its just a glimpse from the corner of your eye seconds from the stroke of midnight. And off he goes back up the chimney.

Other then Shean and Larry over at be-do forwarding messages from location-X, I have yet from any forum possesing qeg as a topic, any comment on youtube, any blog, seen his screen name or alias that of. Maybe its just hidden behind the glare Hopegolddigger tries to cast for herself.

[ACG]

He shows how he does it in this clip. Installing the RF filters inside the LEDs is shown at around 4 minutes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KMLmpC7-Ls

That is why you never trust a demo with LEDs other than size 0603

[MileHigh]

Okay so I did my big technical multi-posting on Kevin's YouTube clip and there is a follow up.

Here is Kevin's reply:

<<<
+Kevin Blundell can you please contact me direct at qegcanada@gmail.com? I have passed on your comments to the lead researchers and they want to talk to you.  Also, they will give you access to all of the tech data.... and, they told me that you are exactly correct and they are aware of all that you have stated here...you are on the same page as them.
>>>

My response:

<<<
Hi Kevin,  I have a counter-proposal for you and your team's consideration.  I am MileHigh on overunity.com.  The thread on the QEG is called, "Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)."  Honestly, over the months the thread has been a mixture of technical analysis of the QEG and harsh criticism of the QEG itself and of Fix the World.  However, at this point in time the thread has petered out and not much is happening.  There is nothing to be gained by repeating stuff that has already been stated.  Now there are some really good technical people on overunity.com.  At this point in time, I am pretty confident that this good group of people would be willing to engage with your technical team in order to assist them in their analysis of the QEG.  Naturally I can't tell anyone what to do, but I think that you will find constructive engagement and a willingness to help.  At the same time, your team has to be prepared for honest comments.  If something stated makes sense, you will hear that.  If something stated is considered to be nonsensical pseudo-tech then you will hear that also.  Let me give you an example.  If someone builds a pulse motor and says it is tuned to the Schumann resonance, I will challenge them on that.  I will state that it is nonsense and there is no possible relationship between a pulse motor and the Schumann resonance.  I will challenge them to provide logical reasoning and actual proof to back up their statement.  "Blind belief" won't cut it and statements have to be backed up with reasoning and data.  Very importantly, both people can state their case and argue out the technology without making ad hominem attacks on the person.  Do you understand where I am coming from and does that make sense to you?  Honestly I think that it would be a good exercise to engage with your team working on the QEG.  This is supposed to be an open source project and it should be done on a public forum without any censorship from either perspective and no attacking of character from either side.  I can tell you honestly that on ou.com everybody is burnt out on the QEG thread.  I am pretty sure that there will be a willingness to "turn the page" and engage with your technical people with the guidelines I outlined above.  Just talking about the QEG itself and what you guys are doing on the bench and how you are analyzing it will be fun.  I will post our mini conversation on the thread.  You and as many of your tech people that want to register and join in the discussion on the thread are welcome.  Any technical information that you wanted to share with me can be shared on the thread.  They just have to make "hello" postings on the thread and we will take it from there.
>>>