Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[truthseeker1313]

As an added note, I work with people who do not resort to negative mindless banter about "well, I guess this was the last great hope"  "I think my blitz threw them..."  blah blah blah.  How about this?  Try doing something constructive with you time.  We handed you and others an invitation and you have gone silent and refused to connect with me.  I gave you my email: qegcanada@gmail.com   and you have yet to try to connect with me.  YOU, not I, are the one trying to mislead people.  If anyone here is serious about the Qeg and has positive feedback on how to move things forward, I would like to extend an open invitation to you to please come and partake in trying to bring this to fruition.  Please contact me at qegcanada@gmail.com and I will gladly put you in touch with Skype groups around the world who are working very hard on the QEG and other over unity devices right now in hopes that we can do some good for humanity.  love to you all
Kevin
QEG Canada

[TinselKoala]

@truthseeker1313:

I have asked you some very reasonable questions, which you have not so far deigned to answer.

1. What exactly makes you think that a QEG will ever be OU? Was it the WITTS demonstration? Was it the statements by HopeGirl, Valerie Robitialle and James Robitaille that they had a working unit, or just what? The WITTS demonstration is widely understood to be fraudulent and of course the statements by the Robitailles have been soundly proven to be false: They do not now have, nor ever have had a working prototype.

2. What makes you think that resonance is a necessary first step to obtaining OU? Can you point to any empirical evidence for this claim that you made? Have you watched my microQEG playlist, where I demonstrate an autoresonating system that produces even greater "OU in VARs" than any FTW QEG build, and where I show extraction of real power, AC or DC, low voltage or high voltage, from the system? Why is my microQEG not OU, when it shows _all the evidence_ and more, than any mechanical QEG has ever shown? Have you even watched my playlist?
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLml9VdOeqKa-k7J7vO_I22fVc-h8wcdLf

3. What kind of data from your testing would possibly cause you to conclude that your efforts are futile? We know what confirmatory data would look like... but any scientist also knows what _disconfirming_ data would look like as well. What would that look like in your construction? Have you done any True Experiments, where you vary one or more Independent Variables and look at the effect on one or more Dependent Variables to find real cause-and-effect relationships? Have you tried testing any well-specified _null_ hypotheses to try to _disconfirm_ them?

And this dialog should be held here, since this is clearly an Open Source project and we here are not interested in censorship or suppression of critical commentary.

[truthseeker1313]

One last thought Mile High....my impression is that you are trying to attract people to overunity.com because the conversation here has died away somewhat.  I feel that that is your motivation for trying to get me and others who are working on the QEG to join here.  I have stated very very clearly that Skype is the preferred place of conversation for QEG groups...it just happened that way, sorry, and they would prefer to keep skyping.  I did indeed ask many engineers if they would like to come over here and they said nope, they were very happy with Skype and they asked me to invite you to come on over....but you have failed to respond.  The invitation is still open if you are interested.  And please, for goodness sake, don't twist my comments into "well, there you go folks...looks like Kevin had to find some form of excuse to not come to discuss things here...looks like the QEG people are just too scared to speak to us because they know we will call them out on their QEG hoax...." or something like that.  That is just very childish.  I will not be connecting here again but again, the invitation is open.  If you are genuinely interested in meeting people and working with people who are involved with the QEG and/or other overunity machines that are being worked on globally, if you feel you have something to offer this movement or if you feel that you need help with what you are working on, I can connect you.  Qegcanada@gmail.com.  The choice is yours, but we all know, the more minds the better.

[TinselKoala]

You are dodging, Kevin. Bob and weave, but do not under any circumstances answer substantive questions.

[truthseeker1313]

Tinsel...all of your answers are available...ALL OF THEM.  I am not an engineer, I am just working with many and following and promoting the QEG because I trust the people I am working with.  If you want the answers, they are readily available.  I can get you in contact with persons who can answer you straight up...please contact me at qegcanada@gmail.com   and I will put you in touch with engineers so that you can discuss your concerns, offer alternative etc.  I am sure that they would love to hear your opinion.  But they are not  on here and they are not planning  on coming here for discussion...sorry about that...skype is where they do their chatting, nothing I can do about that sorry.  please connect with me.