3v OU Flashlight

[TinselKoala]

@ Tk
do it & show it. why you wasting the time in what you dont belive?

Am I wasting your time? Sorry. Just put me in your "ignore" list and keep on trying to get Akula's circuits to work as he demonstrates, then. Please pay no attention to my demonstrations, since they are wasting your time.

I am doing just exactly what I believe in, which is to examine claims of overunity performance, using the best methods I have available to me. If I can't get the claimed performance, no matter what I do, using the exact specifications of the claimant, but I _can_ get the claimed performance by a simple conjurer's trick... I am tempted to draw certain conclusions from that. If nobody else is able to get the claimed performance either, no matter what they do... the temptation gets stronger and stronger. Meanwhile I will keep reporting what I find from my testing, and my time is my own to waste, mostly.

[TinselKoala]

So now I've tried a TIP3055 transistor (thanks Bill!) instead of the IRF3205 mosfet. The TIP3055 does switch and produces another set of different waveforms from the circuit. But with the heavier inductance on the 34063 chip side and the lighter inductance on the transistor side! And as usual phasing is important, I get different waveforms with swapping phase on one coil. Tuning (setting the potentiometer) has a great effect just as expected, since it controls the amplitude of the chip's output oscillations.

But whenever I pull the outside power, the system reverts to straight DC drive, keeping the LEDs lit for a few seconds on the stored energy in the big capacitors.

[tysb3]

@Tk
I forgive you my wasted time
I asking you what is your reason to waste your time?
Despite the using the best methods you have you can not prove that Akula's device isn't overunity.

[Pirate88179]

@Tk
I forgive you my wasted time
I asking you what is your reason to waste your time?
Despite the using the best methods you have you can not prove that Akula's device isn't overunity.

Why should TK, or anyone for that matter, have to prove that ANY device is NOT overunity?  As we have all said on this forum for years now, it is up to the claimant to PROVE his or her device works, not up to others to disprove it.

TK has been attempting to replicate one of the many "claimed O.U." devices from this person.  When he sees that it can not work as advertised, I believe he then begins to think of the many ways it could have been faked.  Remember Mylow?  When TK suggested that he might be using fishing line, he was attacked but, as we now all know, TK was 100% correct.  TK has good instincts along with a wealth of knowledge so, I listen to him.  Maybe you should too?

Bill

[TinselKoala]

@Tk
I forgive you my wasted time
I asking you what is your reason to waste your time?
Despite the using the best methods you have you can not prove that Akula's device isn't overunity.

As long as I have blinking lights, spinny things, and multiple oscilloscopes going on in the lab, my housemate thinks I'm doing something productive, and she leaves me alone. Otherwise, I might have to wash the dishes or clean the bathroom or something.

Right, I can't prove Akula's device isn't OU. I can prove that mine isn't, though, and I'm trying my best to make it functionally identical to his.
It all boils down to what Pirate said: it is the claimant's responsibility to provide enough evidence to support his claim. So far, we are working with the spotty incomplete and error-ridden data that Akula has provided, with Wesley's much appreciated help. But it really isn't enough. So I'm exploring the problem space.

You might better be asking "why does Akula waste everyone's time with partial information and inconclusive demonstrations.... when he should really be working in a secret military lab making fuelless power supplies for Russian submarines and spy satellites?"

I know why.... and I think you do too.