The Bessler Wheel, mystery solved.

[Vortex1]

Most folks try to make a wheel where movable or shifting weights are required to somehow create an unbalance.

It seems this is a wrong approach as the only way to gain a bit of energy in a closed system is in free fall of a weight, allowing it to freely accelerate.

Am I off base? Or is this simplistic thinking? Or both!

[MarkE]

I dont think tension is involved here, even if it is, it is not the driving force. there is none in the wheel which is alive for example you can make it from steel or aluminum. The banging is a result of energy gained, and wasted as a bang. I have found a way to use this gained energy and convert it into a rather efficient energy transformation. This is the reason why it works.


I don't care what other people says but, anything that falls have gained some extra energy in it. I understood why the 2 stage oscillator works, it gained energy from the fall of the weight of the pendulum. I can explain it but I choose not to, it is not the proper time yet, but I will say that my 2 stage lever is a lot more better.


regards

You are dead wrong.  Objects that fall do not gain any extra energy.  They convert almost all of the GPE to kinetic energy.  The rest is lost as heat.

[gurangax]

"It must, simply put, just revolve, without being wound-up, through the principle of 'excess weight'" - Bessler

Provided that the Bessler translation is accurate, I now have understanding of what he meant by 'excess weight'.


regards

[Vortex1]

"It must, simply put, just revolve, without being wound-up, through the principle of 'excess weight'" - Bessler

Provided that the Bessler translation is accurate, I now have understanding of what he meant by 'excess weight'.


regards

Would you kindly expand on your interpretation of Bessler's principle of "excess weight"

Thanks in advance.

[forest]

do you mean by "excess weight" the force addition from the falling down mass ? compared to the same mass in rest ?