COP 20.00 (2000%) Times, Reactive Power Energy Source Generator,

[synchro1]

@Farmhand,


What do you make of this German Certificate of Measurement reporting a COP of 9.4 from Stepanov's transformer? A sneaky wire like the one you imagine would have been noticed by the inspector, don't you think?

[avalon]

OK the patent application EP2429071 makes this disclosure and these claims below.


Now call me suspicious but I see a pattern, guy makes patent application which shows energy returned to the battery or in the case of Tariel he showed a supply disconnect switch and claimed it could power itself.

Using the patent application as some kind of validation they proceed to claim any number of devices that can self run and produce excess power, in Tariel's case he makes money with dodgy demo's where no one can check anything out, and takes investors money I guess. Who knows what Stepanov's angle is. I don;t think it helps anything for a lot of people to declare what he shows is legit and promote it without any real proof.

So we can see the patent application does not claim free energy, it only appears to, to some people. However I don't think it is as novel as he thinks it is.

As far as the demo with the light bank goes, he made a point to show there was no extra wires to the actual bank of load bulbs but made no effort to identify all wires into the box or the meters.

Simply put a video is good if all is shown and it makes some sense. But if the video raises more questions than it answers then it is not much to go on.

Once again, you are looking at / quoting a wrong patent. The one that you need to read is titled 'Resonant transformer'.

~A

[synchro1]

Here's a schematic of Stepanov's transformer from his patent:

[hartiberlin]

It seems this Murray 2000 % device is pretty easy to do.

You only have to make sure that you run your load via a capacitor that is charged and discharged from the grid
AC potential.
ANd then you just switch the current so the input power always stays reactive or the input power
always go negative all the time.

So in simple words it is just a RLC phase shifter with switching integrated .

Have a look like it is explained here. Makes a lot of sense.

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/16966-cop-20-0-2000-demonstration-2.html#post256412

Regards, Stefan.

[hartiberlin]

Here are 2 scopeshots of the Math function of the device from Babcock/Murray from the recent
Bedini Conference:

http://energyscienceconference.com/?attachment_id=208

There you can see, that the input power into the circuit, ( the lower red Math function on the left)
is mostly pure reactive, as the areas over the ground line are equal to the amount of area below the ground line...
So power is going into the circuit and coming out of the circuit....

If you look at the waves at the lamp at the right side you see, that there are the waves just switched in polarity so
the power at the lamps are real and not reactive.

So the currents that generate the Watts that are dissipated at the lamps , are going back again to the grid and
reduce there the input power...

So the input power is oscillating back and forth between the powerstation and your circuit and is not used up, but
your circuit is still powered by real watts by it...
And only using an LCR phase shift and the right polarity switching.

Pretty easy principle, but you first need to realize this...

Regards, Stefan.

P.S:

Here are a few pics from Jim Murray and Paul  Babcock's presentation on the SERPS showing COP 50.0 (5000%) -  Jim Murray & Paul Babcock SERPS COP 50.0 (5000%) Presentation | 2014 Energy Science & Technology Conference (http://energyscienceconference.com/2014/07/09/jim-murray-paul-babcock-serps-cop-50-0-5000-presentation/)