COP 20.00 (2000%) Times, Reactive Power Energy Source Generator,

[listener191]

Attached is page 129 of the TPS-2024 scope being used for measurement in the presentation ppt.

This explains why the Math result for V X I is VA  not W.

Barry

[Farmhand]

Yes if it's just RMS V x RMS Amps then the power factor needs to be determined and applied to get the load power.
Do they rectify their output and run the globes from DC ?
The cost of running the generator should be included, see my post linked below.
http://www.overunity.com/14443/quantum-energy-generator-qeg-open-sourced-by-hopegirl/msg415016/#msg415016

If there is something to this we need to nail it down by investigation. You're doing a very good job at that. Good Job ! 

I need to keep my mind on my own experiments and go to a resistive load. Maybe an AC primary circuit and load switching later.

..

[listener191]

Hi Farmhand,

For the same input voltage the directly connected lamps were brighter.

No surprise there, as the power developed in the lamps diminishes as the caps charge.

Barry

[listener191]

Hi Farmhand,

They state in the presentation, that they rectified the output to the lamps (load).

Their negative half cycle charge current looks to be about 10% greater than the positive haf cycle, probably due to a difference between switches.

This shows up in the rectified current pulses.

Barry

[listener191]

Hi Farmhand,

The voltage across and current through the load are in phase, see attached scopp shot.

The other attached scope shot is interesting, as its the same as the first but averaged over many samples...note how the charge and discharge pulses average.

Barry