Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



COP 20.00 (2000%) Times, Reactive Power Energy Source Generator,

Started by synchro1, May 07, 2014, 01:25:54 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

picowatt

Quote from: hartiberlin on July 11, 2014, 11:24:05 PM
From the scopeshots you can also see, that the timing is 5 milliseconds/DIV and
that one cycle is about 16.6 milliseconds long, which is exactly 60 Hz AC !
So they are just using the normal 60 Hz sine wave from the grid, probably via
a Variac or isolating transformer, so that is why they wrote the label on the scopeshot
as Transformer output.
But they meant the input power from the grid...

Regards, Stefan.

Line frequency was never in question. 

Are we to assume that no change in I or V phase occurs between the actual AC line input and the output of the variac and/or transformer used?  Has anyone stated that this is indeed the case?

Just curious...

PW

ADDED:

I would have thought that the AC line input measurements would have been taken directly at the AC line.  Hooking up the input power analyzer at the AC line would not have given anything away regarding switching.

hartiberlin

In a production unit you would not need any isolating transformer or Variac, so
this is no issue....


The Wattmeter and the scope traces don´t lie !
Again look at the left lower red MATH trace.
It shows just reactive power going in ( only 1.1 Watts Active power)

You basically charge up 2 caps in parallel and discharge them in series
to the grid at the right timing.
So you take power and give power back with the right timing.


As you need only around 1 Watts of real input power, it is now easy to build
a 60 Hz sine wave oscillator only needing 1 Watts of input power and
use this to drive this Babcock Murrray circuit and then do a feedback circuit instead of the lamps
and get a selfrunning system.
Stefan Hartmann, Moderator of the overunity.com forum


picowatt

Quote from: hartiberlin on July 12, 2014, 12:03:08 AM
The Wattmeter and the scope traces don´t lie !


I agree!  It is very likely that the wattmeter and scope are faithfully indicating the waveforms and calculated power as measured at the output of the variac and/or transformer used.

I was just curious as to what those waveforms and power measurements looked like at the actual AC line input.

No problem...

PW

SeaMonkey

Yes, you've figured it out Stefan!  It's an electronic version
of the Old Ponzi scheme.  An illusion.

All of the power dissipated by the load is in fact coming
from the grid.

This is perhaps why non-sinousoidal loading of the grid is
carefully scrutinized by the power companies.  They are
well aware that it is possible to "electronically" fool their
meters.

Small loads will probably not attract their attention but
big loads certainly would.  Spikes and harmonics on the
power grid are a sure sign to them that something is amiss.

They'll want their pound of flesh as compensation.