COP 20.00 (2000%) Times, Reactive Power Energy Source Generator,

[hartiberlin]

@MarkE,
where have you been 30 years along ? 
This cross in the middle of the circle is a standard symbol for an incandescent light bulb...
I learned it already, when I was 10 years old around 1970 ! 

@SchubertReijiMaigo
Yes, the green curve in the original Babcock Murray Scopeshots are the current waveforms.
I called it i(t) which is a standard notation for the current in a circuit dependend on the time.

If you wonder, why in the Babcock Murray Scopeshots at the right side at the lamp output the
current is only positive, well they probably used there an additional bridge rectifier through the
lamps so the current shunts only show positive current or they used their scope set to show only
the absolute value of the current there.
But that does not change the main principle, that the discharge current of the 2 caps in series
drives negative energy back to the grid and thus produce oscillating reactive power.

So the power goes back and forth with the charge and discharge of the capacitors.

@havuhung
It seems to be a simular circuit. What does the Russian text say to it ?
How is the switching algorithm in this case ?

Many thanks.

Regards, Stefan.

[havuhung]

Hi Stefan,
I am looking to the data stored in the computer and link! . .There is a picture of an unknown device is complete or not! . .

[hartiberlin]

@havuhung

At which website was this posted ? Link ?

[hartiberlin]

User Silvertogold o the energetic forum mentioned, that my S1 switch is redundant.

He is absolutely right.

Also from the posted video you can see here in these 3 green marked numbers
that they seem to have only 3 connections of the cap board.

As when you open all my switches S2, S3 and S4 the circuit is already
disconnected !
So no need for S1 !
Then we really only need 3 switches...
The only questions I have not yet pondered about is the
state of charge after the charge and after the discharge cycle.. Hmm
do they really discharge all the charge in the caps and do they really
fully charge the caps of the peak of the sine wave or could this
be varried with their switching control circuits ?

Any ideas ?
Regards, Stefan.

[hartiberlin]

He then replied also regarding the big transformer:

Hi Stefan,

The large transformers could have 2 purposes as I see it,
1) just an isolation transformer for correct power measurements [having isolated grounds through
the transformer to connect them to the measurement machines -
like using a plugged into the wall scope to measure a circuit which is also plugged into the wall,
you have to be aware that the ground of the scope is the same as the ground of circuit and if
connected incorrectly you will get a short circuit or a wrong measurement]

or

2) to move the I & V curves to the correct relationship for the switching to be most effective.  I don't know
which it is but suspect it's the first.

Traditional "motors" and "generators" are actually both.  A motor and a generator and these functions can't be separated.
It operates in both modes at the same time.  When the turbine turns, it acts more as a generator than a motor...
the reactive circuit returns the power to the generator to turn it - making it more of a motor than a generator
and then cycle continues IF the power being returned is more than went in. When the system balances out,
the power of the generator equals the power of the motor and it reaches a set speed.

So basically, you connect an AC "generator" to the reactive circuit, give it a turn and the "generator"
will keep turning with no more power input while powering a resistive load.  A self running motor that
powers a resistive load.  You could connect this generator-motor to another generator and get traditional power.
So that's how it could work.

How does this all work?  I don't know.  The power of charging a cap in parallel and then discharging it in
series from traditional science does nothing but loses energy.  So something else is going on that you're
not going to get from college physics.

But where has this worked before? 
1) Tesla switches &
2) Eric Dollards flux capacitor.
3) Bedini capacitive discharge circuits work on a similar principle.

When you get sharp gradients, things change.

I would be very skeptical of this working at all if it was not for Jim's demonstration.
But there it is and it works.  And it's so simple when you see it and just study Jim's video,
it gives it all away for the most part. 

I think the resistance is important, so they probably tuned it all to get the best results.