COP 20.00 (2000%) Times, Reactive Power Energy Source Generator,

[Khwartz]

What is the difference between the "SERPS concept" and what I showed in the video linked above?

By the way, the Video URL has changed: It is now
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCdrAE_IZ74

Same video, just a different URL.

Hi TinselKoala,

VARs are not the principle the SERPS was supposed to work but indeed, what you did on the video is clearly VARs.

That's all the problem, BTW: you may accumulate 100 W of energy to oscillate between the coil and the caps tank, it is just like a mechanical flywheel  you have fed with energy by turning it, (same with a pendulum but just by swinging it at the beginning) it will continue to turn and you can calculate the "mechanical reactive power" so obtained, but as soon you will use the energy stored in the flywheel, the "reactive power" of the fly wheel will drop and even nullify if not fed back the very same time. In fact, this is mostly ENERGY but NOT// Power.

Your LEDs doesn't bright at all more than 4 W so you are, for now, far to be in overunity :/ You will only demonstrate overunity when your will be able to light with no doubt more than 4 W of light bulbs with full brightness. For this, you need to take a witnessing LED of 4 W (or an equivalent set) fed by its nominal voltage, it will be the unity of lightning, then we will able to compare the power you get with the sames LEDs you put as output but up to 5, 6, or more watts; 8 W, the double, would be very convincing.

For the SERPS principle, it was to reverse a quarter of period the sinusoid one on tow of the Power Curve, so that only "positive" and "negative" sinusoids parts nullifies each other in regard to the power meter. This was supposed to be a Power CONTINUOUSLY produced and so CONTINOUSLY "consumable" (not like a tank circuit which is a limited energy RESERVOIR.

regards,
Didier

[Khwartz]

The current is traveling through one half of the CT transformer on one half cycle and thru the other half of the transformer on the second half cycle.

How can it be? :/ If I take your 8th picture when the primary coil of your transformer is powered one way, the curent in your two halves output coils just go the very same way in the main loop of your circuit; isn't it? I mean, I don't see where and how the quarters of power curves are shifted nor that the current would be out of phase of 99° or around between the to coils output transformer. Could clear that for me? please.

[web000x]

How can it be? :/ If I take your 8th picture when the primary coil of your transformer is powered one way, the curent in your two halves output coils just go the very same way in the main loop of your circuit; isn't it? I mean, I don't see where and how the quarters of power curves are shifted nor that the current would be out of phase of 99° or around between the to coils output transformer. Could clear that for me? please.

My circuit is arranged differently now than it was when I made those posts some time ago. My caps are arranged on the center tapped leg of the transformer and only allowing the caps to charge in one polarity, hence the reason the current waveform was 180 degrees out every other half cycle.  However, it seems I've made a measurement error and that last waveform I posted is meaningless.  I've corrected it and my waveforms look more in line with convention now. 

Are you in contact with listener192? Or do you know how to contact him?

Thanks,

Dave

[Meta]

Problem I've never heard that putting cap to series/parallel can give OU, the energy state still the same because capacitance reduce when put in series...

That being said, Hector Perez (the guy with his rotoverter) claimed in special resonant configuration, that you can extract real power from the reactive one, playing with phase (usually three phase power) is the key.
According to him he reversed current in the battery through the inverter ("reverse" power factor correction).
The load and the inductor act "negative" but a lot of impedance matching is necessary.
In the "combine" PDF you can read that is when R is at current node it's powered by "radiant energy" full light with 1/10 of the input voltage...
This theory is worth what it worth...
Anyway I would like to see a schematic of that circuit before making my definitive opinion.

When I see words like this,
"...Virtual power RE Radiant Energy or RADIO SIGNAL...", or I see sacred numbers such as pi 3.14159 or the golden ratio 1:1.618 showing up in Hector Torres/Rortoverter literature, I know its time to do some serious reading and play follow the leader. Meta.

__________


http://peswiki.com/index.php/OS:Rotoverter

(quote)
Response from MJ:

Any tuned circuit generates lots of virtual power. The one-million question is how to convert that to real power! It is the electric engineering "holy-grail". Any attempt to extract real power will reflect to the source.

Response from Hector Torres:

Idea is to CAPTURE a SAFE portion of the OVERUNITY PF Virtual power RE Radiant Energy or RADIO SIGNAL (think, Gerrard Morin. Meta) being created ... .382 of 1.618 as a sample of 10 x averaged energy .

The DIODE plug energy as transfered to a CAPACITOR becomes REAL joule potential ... ( no longer virtual and is discharged being non reflective to source) Thats all to it , people that do the lab and the math can loop the system , that is already done also (Over 7 looped systems already ) so whats the issue ? I say start on the power savings ones ..
(end quote)


(quote)
Sometimes we need the circuits to extract power from resonance or virtual reactive power circulation.

Sometimes just to limit the voltage growth in a BEMF collection capacitor.

Hector's claims that the resonance holds the radiant energy circulation - where we can extract a large portion of it without stopping the resonance.

(Quote) A simple LC has a DECAY value in time; the only energy you need to supply is the one lost to decay, as if the system source were a negative inductor to LC (as in the case of RV alternator). Normal entropy decay is 0.618 of 1.618 as logarithmic time receding signal (search for Seike work in ultra-relativity concepts), so the gain is also in atropic system of 1.618 where frequency increase in octaves may increase amplification by a factor of 3.141592 where the spiral resonant circular projection can be expressed in a 12,000 4d polygon structure (as similar to double helix DNA structure - reason human system is OU by all definitions). Remember LOGARITHMIC SPIRALS ORBITAL DECAY PATH IS RELATIVE to gravity as SIGNAL DECAY OR GAIN IS RELATIVE TO LC Q and parameters in a working ZPE system.

It can be done either way, using a reactance to charge a cap, or discharge a cap in a reactive circuit; the resonant condition creates a logarithmic path where VAR power is created and carries a magnetic amplification component with it.
(End quote)

[Meta]

From Farmhand on page 9

Surely we can agree on those simple points.

1) On the charge phase the power dissipated by the resistors cannot charge the capacitors.

2) On the discharge phase the power dissipated by the resistors cannot be returned to the supply.

If we can not all agree on those two points, we have strange things to discuss. 

If anyone disagrees with the two points above please say so and explain why and how it can be different.

..

P.S. Basically these people are claiming that they can draw power from the supply and dissipate almost all of that power in
the light bulbs and then return that same power to the supply.

Our job as experimenters is to determine what is actually happening because what I just described cannot be what is going on.
Can't have your cake and eat it too.

..

Here's a strange thing you don't know of and I doubt that Murry and Babcock know of it either.

The Electron Theory of electrons moving from positive to negative, has a diametrically opposite partner called the Hole Theory where electrons move from negative to positive and I make use of it in the MetaQEG device. Electrons move both ways, spiraling around a wire.