Current ridicule

[steeltpu]

hey raburgeson,  ignore MarkE and his minions.   they are stuck in the clueless box or trolls of the PTB.   I know a guy that got 200 MPG from a full size vehicle and it is not fake and no not the Pogue carb.   what is taught about fuel to air mixture is false. 

btw what were you doing to get 35mpg on that old gas hog?   i'm currently working on a vehicle largely with electronics and expect to get at least double the manufacturer spec mpg.   it's already way better than spec.

                        

[MarkE]

hey raburgeson,  ignore MarkE and his minions.   they are stuck in the clueless box or trolls of the PTB.   I know a guy that got 200 MPG from a full size vehicle and it is not fake and no not the Pogue carb.   what is taught about fuel to air mixture is false. 

btw what were you doing to get 35mpg on that old gas hog?   i'm currently working on a vehicle largely with electronics and expect to get at least double the manufacturer spec mpg.   it's already way better than spec.

Sure you know a guy ...  And where may one find an independent test report on this wonderful mythical car?

It's nice that you merely assert that the stoichiometric limits are BS.  I don't suppose you have any actual test data to support your assertion do you?

When you are done with your modifications you can take your car out for dynamometer testing.  Then you can report what you get for: mileage and pollutants.  Evaluating whether you burn valves and/or cause other damage by running ultra lean will require that you put a good deal of miles on the car. You can get a fiber optic bore scope and take pictures of one or more cylinders right before you start running with your modifications, and then periodically after.

[steeltpu]

what's the use responding to you as anything i say you will just claim is a lie.   try google.   start with Tom Ogle and his story.  only a little over 100 mpg with a ford galaxie 4000 pound car and it's not all about running lean but what state the fuel is in before getting to the cylinders.    there are a number of 200 plus mpg cars and i just happen to know one guy out of many.   got over 10,000 miles on my mods which have seen over 75% better mpg than the manufacturer says is the best highway mpg possible.   already a high mileage car and it's still running great.   but you'll just claim everything is say is a lie.  dig deep enough and you'll find info on the air/fuel mix lies but i suspect you already know that.

[sarkeizen]

start with Tom Ogle and his story.

"story" is right.

Average car fuel efficiency = 23 mpg.
Average engine efficiency ~ 25-35%.

Hence a car running at 100% efficiency wouldn't be able to break 100 mpg and that's in a car that's likely 1000 lbs lighter than Tom Ogle's.  Not to mention that a car that is 100% efficient would produce no noise.  Something missing from the scant reports of Ogle.

Most likely conclusion:  Tom was wrong.

[steeltpu]

ahh nazikrees did they give you a pay raise to finally expand to bashing another message thread beside quentron?   lol  .   guess you missed the 300mpg vw?   scant reports of ogle?  hardly scant as there are newspapers that ran his story.  try this one  http://fuel-efficient-vehicles.org/energy-news/?page_id=787      as i recall he got a lot of attention and suddenly had a lot of money.   then still in his 20's he supposedly died of a drug or alcohol overdose.    imo the ptb gave him a good amount of money so he would do what most young people would do when they lose a friend.  his friend was killed when a car jack supposedly gave out and crushed him.   so Tom gets drunk.   At that point i'll bet they slipped drugs into his drink which OD'd him.  easy solution to their problem of how to make the 100 mpg full size ford go away.