1939 Gravity Power - multiply power by 1200%

[ARMCORTEX]

There is a high probality that skinner made a few designs.

Seek understanding of the mechanism of how the motion encourages increase of torque.

Qiman is wrong when he says these are open loop.

These are positive feedback, and I a, not just talking of relooping electricity to the prime mover.

[Artoj]

Here are the guesstimates for the pulleys. Regards Arto.

[qiman]

Qiman is wrong when he says these are open loop.

These are positive feedback, and I a, not just talking of relooping electricity to the prime mover.

It is open loop and it is also positive feedback. If you don't know how both are true, reread my post on how the input and output are disconnected.

[DreamThinkBuild]

Hi Aaron,

Thank you for that information.

Hi Artoj,

Really clear drawings, thank you.

Hi Luc,

The only reason I see the top part is for leverage against the angular load applied to the shaft. I see this in the Lego model where even though the shaft isn't directly coupled to the prime mover the shafts weight will push to one side of the ring which adds a load to the prime mover. It could be redesigned where the motor just pushes a spherical bearing around a support ring reducing the angular load. The whole goal is to get the prime mover to just shift the axis, it's up to the falling weight to generate the actual torque in the shaft. I attached a picture of a simplified version.

[ARMCORTEX]

Just because the drive is offsetted doesnt mean you will get infinite gain.

I think Chalkalis claimed something like 300 times OU , while others said 8-10.

Thats the maximum I heard about, so you are incorrect, and according to you Jim Murray would have infinite OU but his factor is only 2.