New 3rd-party test results on SHT show over 1000x overunity

[rukiddingme]

http://pesn.com/2014/07/03/9602514_New-3rd-party-test-results_on_solar-hydrogen-trends_show-over-1000x-overunity/

[MarkE]

It's a hydrogen version of Mylow (Jose Concepcion).  The audio interview Sterling Allan conducted with the help of Mike Waters is chock full of silly and ridiculous statements by SHT president Jack Aganyan.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYliDUI8bY4

Here is his abbreviated bio from the SHT web site. 

"Jack Aganyan is a founder and president at Solar Hydrogen Trends. He led the development of the technology and has created the vision for the company. Jack has funded and sold number of projects and has founded several companies."

When listening to the idiotic pseudoscience he spouts, keep in mind that his bio says that he led the technology development.

[ramset]

Yes,
Jack is not the scientist and does not speak like one ,he assembled a team
and this Man would be the man to interview.

Konstantin Balakiryan

Quote from Konstantin

I'm an old, conservative and old fashion man.

So I can't break the tradition of the scientific community which I belong to for more than
40 years .

I ask all participants to wait a little more for theoretical justification for anomalous
processes that occur in hydrogen reactor "Symphony 7A".

All the data that we have published is within statistical error of 2-3%.

As you know every scientist cherishes its scientific reputation and his life .

Result of 1Lit. of water = 1 kg of hydrogen is a Damoklov
sword for our reputation (sharp sword hovering over our heads), our lives and
the lives of people we love. We are not stupid to risk the most valuable things
we have.

To understand how serious this is, please remember the fate of Stanley Meyer,
Andrea Puharich and Francisco Pacheco, as well as a dozen other mysterious
deaths of researchers working on the hydrogen problem.

For all those who we throw the challenge, their own profits are more important than
happiness that will bring humanity Great Hydrogen Revolution .

Sincerely

Konstantin
Balakiryan

PhD,
Professor
More from Professor Balakiryan

Dear Colleagues,

I am closely following all the discussions on multiple forums.

I really like your judgments and their proximity to understanding
the processes that occur in reality in the hydrogen reactor "Symphony
7A".

Unfortunately, according to the existing ethics in the
scientific community, the authors are not encouraged to discuss about any research
results with the media before they are published in scientific journals.

However, in order for you to understand what a great discovery
GOD gave to us all please try to find answers
in the following questions:

1. If the working substance in the reactor is water, how
come the output is almost only hydrogen ?

2. After splitting water where do molecules of oxygen
disappear?

3. What role in stunning efficiency of "Symphony
7A" plays a collective excitation of nucleons in the nuclei of atoms of oxygen?

4. Is it possible at a rate of 0.5 kW energy hour and at
operating temperature 60 degrees centigrade, to have a nuclear fission and fusion?

5 . To produce 1kg of hydrogen it is necessary to split 9
liters of water, then how or in what way in this hydrogen reactor
"Symphony 7A", it takes only 1 liter?

Sincerely,

Konstantin Balakiryan

PhD, Professor
------------------------------------------
from this link
http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/03/15/solar-hydrogen-trends-claims-breakthrough-hydrogen-production-system-cop-400-claimed/


------------------
Mark
as you are aware I spoke with Jack in March on the behalf of a peer review Team I also spoke with
Shen Chen the fellow that ran the test for Jack.

at that time Jack was in negotiations with Stamford Tech for some testing and Peer review.

the Only comment I will make here is The gauge on the DUT [Jack's device] which measured input power, were used by Chen to measure input during that test,

that struck me as Odd and I did not go further with the "Ruff" questions...

however it would be nice to see a full test report with all equipment used in the test and the calibration log on that equipment.

** My comments above on the testing were on a prior test by Mr.Chen,

thx
ChetKremens@gmail.com

[MarkE]

Yes,
Jack is not the scientist and does not speak like one ,he assembled a team
and this Man would be the man to interview.

Konstantin Balakiryan

Quote from Konstantin

I'm an old, conservative and old fashion man.

So I can't break the tradition of the scientific community which I belong to for more than
40 years .

I ask all participants to wait a little more for theoretical justification for anomalous
processes that occur in hydrogen reactor "Symphony 7A".

All the data that we have published is within statistical error of 2-3%.

As you know every scientist cherishes its scientific reputation and his life .

Result of 1Lit. of water = 1 kg of hydrogen is a Damoklov
sword for our reputation (sharp sword hovering over our heads), our lives and
the lives of people we love. We are not stupid to risk the most valuable things
we have.

To understand how serious this is, please remember the fate of Stanley Meyer,
Andrea Puharich and Francisco Pacheco, as well as a dozen other mysterious
deaths of researchers working on the hydrogen problem.

For all those who we throw the challenge, their own profits are more important than
happiness that will bring humanity Great Hydrogen Revolution .

Sincerely

Konstantin
Balakiryan

PhD,
Professor
More from Professor Balakiryan

Dear Colleagues,

I am closely following all the discussions on multiple forums.

I really like your judgments and their proximity to understanding
the processes that occur in reality in the hydrogen reactor "Symphony
7A".

Unfortunately, according to the existing ethics in the
scientific community, the authors are not encouraged to discuss about any research
results with the media before they are published in scientific journals.

However, in order for you to understand what a great discovery
GOD gave to us all please try to find answers
in the following questions:

1. If the working substance in the reactor is water, how
come the output is almost only hydrogen ?

2. After splitting water where do molecules of oxygen
disappear?

3. What role in stunning efficiency of "Symphony
7A" plays a collective excitation of nucleons in the nuclei of atoms of oxygen?

4. Is it possible at a rate of 0.5 kW energy hour and at
operating temperature 60 degrees centigrade, to have a nuclear fission and fusion?

5 . To produce 1kg of hydrogen it is necessary to split 9
liters of water, then how or in what way in this hydrogen reactor
"Symphony 7A", it takes only 1 liter?

Sincerely,

Konstantin Balakiryan

PhD, Professor
------------------------------------------
from this link
http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/03/15/solar-hydrogen-trends-claims-breakthrough-hydrogen-production-system-cop-400-claimed/


------------------
Mark
as you are aware I spoke with Jack in March on the behalf of a peer review Team I also spoke with
Shen Chen the fellow that ran the test for Jack.

at that time Jack was in negotiations with Stamford Tech for some testing and Peer review.

the Only comment I will make here is The gauge on the DUT [Jack's device] which measured input power, were used by Chen to measure input during that test,

that struck me as Odd and I did not go further with the "Ruff" questions...

however it would be nice to see a full test report with all equipment used in the test and the calibration log on that equipment.

thx
ChetKremens@gmail.com

Chet:  On their website  it states plainly that Jack Aganyan "led the technology".  The claims are pure BS.  People who have tried to get real SME's in to have a look have been rebuffed. 

SHT is a living art version of a Nigerian 419 letter.

[ramset]

Well
In this case I feel that " Led" translates into  "Payed for and managed"
15 years worth and counting ...


I would like to see the latest report ,  You seem to have a very strong opinion about this ...


have you seen the Data from the test Lab ?


Thx
Chet