Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[d3x0r]

@TA
You see no diffference between the figure you drew and the one recorded on ferrofilm?

[MileHigh]

Kenny:

That was just another whackadoo answer to my question to you about how you make a magnet.  You completely changed the subject to the wireless transmission of energy.

Your argument about the definition of a field was to point to antiquity and claim that they got it right.  That's totally lame.  You can't define a field either.  But.... ah-ha!  When you look at how fields and volume and energy relate to each other, it all makes sense.  Haven't heard much from you about that.

Plus, even some of your supporters know that you are making a big blunder.  But they are sellouts and they won't say anything.  Don't want to disturb your stream-of-consciousness 'genius.'  Couldn't do that.

So, it would appear that you have no clue how to make a magnet.

Space is like a 3D carpet that you yank and away the wave goes traveling down the carpet like a moving disturbance.  What happens when a wave travels down a carpet Kenny?  Can you relate that to fields and space?

MileHigh

[TheoriaApophasis]

Why cannot magnetization just be the alignment of something in the pre-magnet substrate as is conventional thinking?

I.e., apply an external magnetic field to a NdFeB pre-magnet of sufficient strength to saturate the neo, domains align, remove external magnetic field, crystalline/molecular/electron properties of NdFeB causes retention of that alignment up to the Curie temp. 

what "domains" , thats a BS description of the inter-atomic magneto-dielectric     Same as "bloch wall"       , its just a BS term assigned to formerly unknown phenomena.


You mean the hexagonal lattice of the Neo



>>>>>>>>>Why does electricity have to enter into the mechanism involved at all?


coherency or increase in capacitance are BOTH "(di)electrical" by NATURE AND DEFINITION.

Id love you to show ANY system that ISNT dielectric, magnetic, and electric.........   any such system is atomic in its very nature, by its very nature.   Ergo your premise does NOT exist.




>>>Why cannot magnetization just be the alignment of something in the pre-magnet substrate as is conventional thinking?

Conventionally, you like most people think that "magnetism is driving a "magnet"...."    it isnt .   .........Magnetism = radiation = polarization = creation of space.



Honestly, (no offense), but why the FUCK did you think Faraday and JJ Thomson called magnetism  "the dielectric FIELD"   


All spatial fields are resultants of radiation, of discharge,   both connotatively and DEnotatively.



Radiation OF what BY what?   ............again  >>>>>>>>>>>      magnetism is NOT  "driving/running"  a "magnet"    PERIOD,  and double period.


You, like MOST, are blaming flies (space, polarization) on the horseshit (magnetism)............ you LEFT OUT the Horse (dielectricity)  as cause.   


Once again  "fallacy of attribute reification"


coherency of dielectric inertial from induction without increase in capacitance

OR increase in capacitance and having proportional (and higher gauss) macro-magnetic preponderances...


both of those are driven by dielectric interia as necessitated in ANY magnetic and dielectric conjugate system



Dont you even know the FIELD cross-section of AC transmission lines??? 


The only damn thing giving MASS(iveness) to Matter/Mass IS magnetism.      If you dont grasp that, you cannot grasp ANYTHING.

[TheoriaApophasis]

You can't define a field either.

I DID define FIELD in the book

and have at LEAST a 300 page book on fields to be written as the next work....,  with an ALREADY existent 150 pages of notes in 5 MS WORD files... and an additional 210+ pages of handwritten notes on same.




Checkmate

[TheoriaApophasis]

@TA
You see no diffference between the figure you drew and the one recorded on ferrofilm?

D3X0R........as I mention in the video, the ONLY reason there isnt 100% perfect match is because the LED spacing is not 100% proportional on MY FERROCELL (only)


Sorry, but I didnt design the LED spacing to fit the lens circumference.


I mention this several places in in the video........  however that is JUST MY FERROCELL  (not others)