Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

So tonight i carried out the !magnetic field effecting a beam of light !test.

First test was set at 5 meters.I built a small box to carry the laser,and placed a white board 5 meters away.The laser has a 2mm focal point(diameter of the red dot).So i turned on the laser,and with a very fine felt tip pen,i places a small black dot in the center of the lasers 2mm red dot. I then bought the strongest magnet i have(n52 neo) close to the laser beam-right up until it was almost within the beam. There was no change in position or clarity of the lasers dot on the white board. I then carried out the same test at 32 meters(the longest part of my yard). The laser dot was still cristal clear,and held fast at 2mm diameter.Once again,i bought the magnet close to the lasers beam-and no change in position or clarity was seen with the lasers dot.
Next was a trip to the park up the road. the test was carried out again at a distance of 100 meters-and once again,no change in position or clarity of the lasers dot on the white board. At 100 meters even the slightest shift or bend in the lasers beam would have been detected-but nothing at all.

From this test,it would seam that a magnetic field dose not effect a beam of light-in that it will not effect the path of the beam.

But all was not lost with buying the laser,as i now have a way to exercise the dogs without leaving my chair lol.

VERY PICKY on the angle and WHERE you hit it,  .  Hit the edge centrifugal point.     You have lots of electromagnets as well,  use same.

It works.



>>>>>>>>>>>> I then bought the strongest magnet i have(n52 neo) close to the laser beam-right up until it was almost within the beam.


thats an issue, get about 4 feet away, NOT CLOSE and use a STEEP ANGLE of attack VERY close to parallel with the centrifugal edge.

Its coherent light after all.


Below picture is NOT my invention:



(however below that (in green)  IS MINE in red)

[tinman]

.. 

Acca....


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-9f8nl94Jg&list=UUwVT-3hF29an4vZOz7nGOwg&index=1
Gustave le Bonn said:

And who is the Aussie guy you mentioned in the video,and who's video it is,that has no idea as to what is going on in the video?.

[TheoriaApophasis]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-9f8nl94Jg&list=UUwVT-3hF29an4vZOz7nGOwg&index=1
Gustave le Bonn said:

INTERESTING!!!!!  Hes made some nice comments, but I didnt know he made his own video too   

[minnie]

This thing with a lens reminded me of the   Austin - Hayes transmission  dating
from the 1930's.
   It was a clever contraption for its time but proved expensive and prone to wear.
No doubt if they had the oils and materials we have these days it could have been
made reliable.
   I had no idea how difficult a subject light and magnetism was before I looked
at this thread. I've just come across Wheeler's delayed choice experiment,quite
a job to get my head round it though!
                            John.

[TheoriaApophasis]

its fun showing where magnetism is located (yes located) and where dielectricity is CONCENTRATED AT



almost "nerd art"