Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

Why not patenting the Magnetic Vortex idea?

thats not even possible actually.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Calling Einstein an idiot might make you feel smarter...but, EVERYONE knows when you do that you are just calling yourself an idiot.

Nice try, thanks for playing.  Please try again.

Twas TESLA that said Einstein was an idiot,  .....so do I,  so do countless many.


"Too bad, Sir Isaac, they dimmed your renown and turned your great science upside down. Now a long haired crank, Einstein by
name, puts on your high teaching all the blame. (he) Says: matter and force are transmutable and wrong the laws you thought
immutable. I am much too ignorant, my son, for grasping (crazy) schemes so finely spun." - N. Tesla (Fragments of Olympian
Gossip. by Nikola Tesla regarding Einstein)




Tesla said of theory of relativity: "a mass of error and deceptive ideas violently opposed to the teachings of great men of science of
the past and even to common sense." - N. Tesla






"Einstein and his ilk reified space as 'something' that 'did things' and 'acted upon things'. This is the fallacy of attribute reification,
and is a titanic error of thought and theory. Einstein has blamed the flies (forces) on the horse feces (space), completely ignoring the
horse (fields) entirely. This brain wasting idiocy can and must come to an end given time and intelligent minds to see clearly. Nobody
who has ever lived has seen space 'do' anything."

Tesla was right, 100%


Youre a fools fool

[TheoriaApophasis]

You are right.  Einstein only REINVENTED Physics as we know it.

Thats a HEFTY GODDAMN CLAIM son,   for which there is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER,...................... only THEORETICAL (fucking worthless speculation) PHYSICS




How it works is,  THEORETICAL PONTIFICATION PHYSICS (idiots musing about shit that DOESNT EXIST) ............... is NOT PHYSICS




See, how it works , son, is PHYSICS root  is PHYSICAL,.........meaning  "real shit",...........not THEORIES



Nothing in EMPIRICAL PHYSICS has one goddamn SINGLE thing to do with ANYTHING that idiot Einstein said.








by the way, his fucking theory is still that , a GODDAMN THEORY   


and its being disproved more and more and more EVERY DAY




Likewise, the moron won a nobel prize with an INCORRECT CONCLUSION based upon CORRECT OBSERVATIONS, .......observations by OTHERS as it happens...


So his only real fame, is based upon a believable but wholly UNTRUE pack of BS.


The idiot Einstein said: "We are faced with a new kind of difficulty. We have two contradictory pictures of reality; separately (particle and wave theory) neither of them fully explains the phenomena of light, but together they do." The 'photon' is a purely arbitrary concept. Einstein wrongly concluded light was a discrete wave-packet. He called such a wave-packet a 'light quanta'. Light, in fact, is D.E.M (dielectro-electromagnetic), a tri-fold circuit. The fundamental mass particle itself being a dielectric accretion formed in galactic formations, it is no coincidence whatsoever that light, like an atom itself, has dualistic properties of both waves and a beam of elements.






The Photoelectric effect lie corrected, the dielectric discharge effect

The erroneous Einstein mental failure as currently thought of as a "wave packet" is in fact a dielectric pulse in the radial center of EM propagation. This pulse is proportional to the frequency, the intensity of the EM being emitted as the Z-axis radial-dielectric (wrongly called photo-electric) charges indicate from experimentation. The Quantum notion of a "wave packet" and the 'photon' do not exist in the electromagnetic-dielectric model of the EM spectrum. They are phantom misunderstandings of electrodynamics, dielectric capacitance and reciprocating mutual conjugation by and thru magneto-spatial and dielectric-counterspatial co-axial energy formations.

The test and results of the photoelectric experiment are, of course, completely accurate and valid, the explanation however (where myopic pseudo-science fails typically) is a pure insane fantasy, both illogical, irrational, absurd, and purely the insane conclusion of Einstein's idiocy and his atomistic proclivities. Einstein had absolute NO training or study in electrical theory ala Tesla, Faraday, Maxwell and others. His only acclaim, his Nobel Prize for the photoelectric effect (not its results, but its explanation!) is a complete lie, fabrication and utter farce in the extreme.

Insanity defined in pure rarified form: "Photons have no mass, but they have momentum and they have an energy". A massless mass/particle is an absurd premise in the extreme, in defining the so-called photon, which in reality is a radial dielectric Z-axis component of the so-called "electromagnetism". It has inertia (not momentum, which is applicable to mass/matter), it of course has energy and is the only component of light that is the source for the energy of both its discharge as magnetism, and its magneto-dielectric mirror in transverse composition as electricity in the dielectro-electromagnetic true nature of light. This applies to the entire 'electromagnetic' spectrum. Light itself (as this work expands in form and editions) cannot exist without a Z-axis radial dielectric component, absolutely no different than the coaxial cable.

Below: The lie of the "photoelectric effect" showing non-existent electrons being shot off the reflector. Replace E with energy of the dielectric, h Planck and f frequency remain the same. This diagram is a lie fundamentally since the charged induction from the dielectric resides as capacitance between two charging plates, there is NOTHING (as the wrongly implied 'discharge particle') shot off the surface material, and certainly no electrons.

The so-called "photoelectric effect" explains why the energy of the charging dielectric was dependent only on the frequency of the incident light and not on its intensity: a low-intensity, high-frequency source could supply a few high energy dielectric pulsations, whereas a high-intensity, low-frequency source would supply no radial dielectric pulsations of sufficient energy to cause charge upon the striking surface.
Einstein's unintelligent conclusions were that this wrongly conceived "photoelectric effect" contradicted the wave theory of light that followed by J.C. Maxwell's equations for electromagnetic behavior, however the truth of course is that this observed effect is the resultant of charging from dielectric inductance from the radial center-co-axial nature of high-energy and frequency light which is dielectro-electromagnetic. Contrary to belief, they did not contradict Maxwell's equations in the observed results, rather proved the central axial conductor of electromagnetism, the dielectric, however wrongly interpreted and understood by the lesser mind of Einstein.

[TheoriaApophasis]

and so...

[Pirate88179]

Thats a HEFTY GODDAMN CLAIM son,   for which there is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER,...................... only THEORETICAL (fucking worthless speculation) PHYSICS

No evidence?  Have you not heard of...THE BOMB?  (It actually worked in case you missed it)  Have you not read his letter to FDR written from Long Island urging the US to produce the bomb?  I am not saying that the bomb is a good thing in our history, but, many countries were working on it and, if it was destined to be invented then, I am glad that the US got there first.  All credit was given to Einstein.

So, how does all of this get twisted by you that he never invented anything?  Just theories?  Well bub, all great discoveries start out as theories.

Except, so far, yours.

Bill