Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[minnie]

  One thing Einstein seems to have got right " life is like riding a bicycle, in order to keep
  your balance you've got to keep moving".

[SeaMonkey]

That statement pre-dates Einstein by quite a few
years.  It is what amounts to common knowledge
or common sense.

Did Einstein ever have an original thought?

Many have tried to find one but with little success.

[wattsup]

The absolute truth, as it happens, magnetism is NOT a field in definition, once finally reduced, rather a force of the loss of dielectric inertia

Magnetism is a FORCE, not a field, all spatially divergent Ether modalities are the loss of counterspatial inertia, expressed either as magnetism, or spatial condensates as matter, or as transverse expressions of electricity. There is only ONE FIELD, dielectricity, the rest are field modalities with divergent expressions.

and no, Im not contradicting myself, however as a CONTRIVANCE, speaking about "magnetic fields" is acceptable for DISCUSSION, .......but the brass tacks are that MAGNETISM IS NOT A FIELD

@TA

Top of the year to you and everyone (who cares right).

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

I think your brain is starting to tick in reality and I will give you a few more months and if your logic is as pristine as can be hoped, you will eventually dispense with the field, the counter-field, the dielectric counter-dielectric mumbo jumbo and just realize that magnets are a Localized Gravity Source. Then you will get to a point where you will only analyze gravity and its true purpose and relationship to mass, atoms and the atomic core.

Magnets = Localized Gravity Source - Like Earth and Sun except they are bigger.
Atoms = Binding shell but non-electron, with a core depending on the element, I have identified 6 major attributes which are Stay, Show, Sway, Swing, Spin and Shoot. These 6 attributes explain all the physical phenomena we call electricity, heat, light and everything in between.
Space = Diluted Gravity Presence (you float in space because gravity is equal all around you).

These three items are all you need to create a universe. Throw enough atoms out into space and eventually you will produce worlds, no magnetic field required.

Just realize that all the images of patterns you showed with your magnet paper over a magnet are the affect of localized and/or centralized gravity and the atoms of your magnet paper are just angling themselves to that magnets' center point thus creating your patterns. Your FLIR showing heat in the magnet is just a limitation of your instrument when looking at a reflective surface. hehehe

Anyways, with the above simple three systems, all the effects we have ever seen on our benches can be both explained in a visual sense and matches all the measurement data we know of. Without any need to entertain any notions of electron and fields.

Example:

What I mean is you can make a coil and pulse it with 200 watts any way you want or take a good sized magnet, does not matter one bit. Then you take two measurement devices, one specifically designed by Standard EE to measure what is the so called flux field and another instrument that is specifically designed to measure Earth Gravity. You place both sensors at the same distance from the coil, let's say 1/4" away. You obtain two measurement values, one in Tesla and the other in Newtons. Which one is right? If both are right, then why are we only looking at one result?

So imagine, they invented the notion of the magnetic field from long ago but had to then explain what the field did when it passed a wire, so they invented the electron as being around the atom so when the field moved the electrons inside the wire flowed to produce electricity. After these invented notions of a field, they needed to measure it and this they called it after the master of all electricity, Mr. Tesla. They used his name to fame to solder the deal, since no one in their right mind would argue with Mr. Tesla.

So the question is why. Why go to all the trouble of inventing a totally mystical dogma of energy, when it all was explained in Newtons as Gravity. Well it is very simple. Newton had enough fame for 10 men, and some men wanted some of that fame for themselves and we are living the back end of this today. Then the Quantum story began because electrons were not enough, we know had to have nuclei with protons and neutrons made of quarks and now with higgs bosons and every other "ons" one can think of to make a name for oneself. It's sub-atomic hunting season and the winnings go to the biggest kill. I know, how else could they have justified spending a good billion of more on colliders. History 101 for OUers.

wattsup

[FatBird]

What a GIGANTIC WASTE OF TIME somebody did on this.  How does this help the world get away from petroleum?

SM never needed that depth of "hodge podge" info to make his Historic TPU Free Electricity device.
Nor did Floyd Sweet to make his historic VTA Free Electricity device.

Really sad that someone would waste this amount of time, yet ABSOLUTELY FAILED to show a Magnetic
device to deliver free electricity.  So Really, Really SAD, to say the least.
                                                                                                                      .

[TheoriaApophasis]

Quote:
"EINSTEIN: Nothing in the entire modern world runs off anything Einstein said or did. Nearly everyone knows his name."
Wrong again: what about the Universe?

Insane bullshit, his rancid goddamn theory is still THAT,  a  FUCKING THEORY





Space NOR Time are forces or fields, and CANNOT ACT ON ANYTHING



Tesla also said the same, ...........      your hero is an INTELLECTUAL PEDOPHILE