Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

Started by TheoriaApophasis, July 13, 2014, 04:20:12 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 14 Guests are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

Quote from: TheoriaApophasis on July 14, 2014, 01:58:58 PM

Poor child, if you ACTUALLY had read the book, I would tell you that what fools think is a "magnet" is an electrified dielectric object

IN WHICH, in perfect condition, is 3.23606 parts dielectricity to 1 part magnetism.

Are you quite sure it's not 3.23607 parts? Maybe it's 3.23605 parts and your pencil was stuck.

Quote


Yes, they ARE electrical , however you confuse electricity with dielectricity, but that is ok.


However you, like everyone else, has no idea what a "field" even is.  There is no accurate definition of same.

Go ahead, genius. Build something using "your" delusions that can't be fully explained and understood by conventional physics. You can't. Now explain how a television set works using "your" delusions. You can't.

You are providing much amusement, script kiddie. Keep it up!

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: TinselKoala on July 14, 2014, 06:11:51 PM
Baby boy, I have experimental _notebooks_ that are older than you are. 


Proving PLATO right yet again



"He is old, but not wise"  - Plato

"Learned and old he is, but only AGE has grown on him, but NOT the fruit of wisdom"-   Samyutta Nikaya



Tesla did more and invented more FAR younger than you.  Your "very old notes" prove one thing:

Youve been (intellectually) ....... "banging your head against the wall for a LONG TIME"   ;)

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: TinselKoala on July 14, 2014, 06:11:51 PM
understanding what I've written _and published_ in major scientific journals



Let me explain something to you son, in honest respect.    The worst FILTH to come from current science is "peer reviewed" trash from Academia.

Did you expect a wise and intelligent person like myself to FALL FOR  nonsense like "virtual photons"  and the TRASH of  GR and QM (quantum mechanics)?


"Where common sense and intuition failed, we (the insane relativists) had to create a new form of intuition based upon abstract
(unreal) mathematics. When common sense fails, we must create uncommon sense."
-Leonard Susskind, professor theoretical physics, and priest of the cult of Quantum

Quantum insanity: "Everything we call real is made up of things that cannot be real." – N. Bohr

Quantum insanity: "The more you see how strange nature behaves, the harder it is for us to make a model that explains even the how
the most simple phenomena works. Theoretical physics has given up on this pursuit." – R. Feynman




"nothing true is popular, and nothing POPULAR is true"     Your  "popular journals" appeal to POPULAR MINDS, son. 


The ancient Pali term for popular (puthujjana)  is the SAME WORD for idiot.  ;)

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: TinselKoala on July 14, 2014, 06:15:01 PM
Go ahead, genius. Build something using "your" delusions that can't be fully explained and understood by conventional physics. You can't


I have 4 patents,  how about yourself?


Conventional Physics (as meant GR and QM  BS) doesnt even know what a FIELD is


Physics has never EVER defined

1. a field

2. instant action at a distance

3. magnetic reciprocation.



Forget about anything I build son,  Physics doesnt even understand the elemental forces of nature.   (of which MOST genuine scientists will ADMIT THIS FACT)


So, your INSANE premise that physics can BOTH "explain everything" and they in fact do NOT know how the fudamental forces WORK,  OR what a FIELD is


.....that son, is proof you are both unwise, and full of hubris and insanity.  ;)


" fully explained "  what son?    You would have to understand fundamental forces and what a FIELD IS (at the very least) to " fully explain"   ANYTHING



Your breed of insanity wont penetrate the mind of the wise, only fools.

MileHigh

Such drama!

Anyway, Theora you haven't responded to any of my basic technical questions.  I was tempted to list them, perhaps later.

My fundamental point is that your propositions don't make sense and you don't have any evidence to support your model.  I am asking you to provide a logical argument to back up your claims!  You play with that giant neodymium magnet in a new clip and you talk about field procession as per the diagrams in your pdf.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FesNe2UKcJQ

But of course one more time you are observing ordinary effects that most children have observed when playing with magnets.

Then in the attached images you look at what you see on the CRT screen and show your analysis.  All that you have to do is use a compass to map out the magnetic field in 3D space.  That is direct observable evidence for what is taking place!  Keep it simple and analyze what the compass is telling you without injecting stuff from "above."