Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[Pirate88179]

Joel:

Yes, it is constant.

In the equation E=Mc squared, C is the constant for the speed of light.  If light were not constant then nuclear bombs would not explode...and we know that they do.

Bill

[sadang]

@sm0ky2

I'm assuming at this point you would like the place yourself in the 4th category, but you seem to display characteristics of the 2nd.

Is your assumption, and you have all the rights to express it. But let's not spread even the last drop of doubt! Let's keep the discussion between us in terms of common sense.

When you will see the ether not just as you see it now, namely as something that pervade everything, but will see it also as something from which everything is made of, even you, then and only then you will see with other eyes the Ken's book and not only.

There are many individual guys, private and governmental labs who study the magnetic vortex and the helical dynamics as fundamental dynamics of the ether. Even in the official science are lot of articles about magnetic vortexes at quantum levels, just there they are still analyzed in the official scientific paradigm of an empty space, and are seen as well-known and totally abstract concept called FIELDS.

Pay attention to Z axis from my last message or go directly to Ken's book, or more easy, try to explain it (for yourself) for official electromagnetic theory! You know, that two elephants don't think and act in terms of vectors! Even Maxwell warned about that! And don't forget, everything is just a matter of interpretation!

[MileHigh]

you LOST your goddamn fucking mind.   

Every scientist on earth with 2 brain cells KNOWS that the speed of light is VARIABLE depending on the inductive medium of transmission

http://www.natureworldnews.com/articles/1010/20130325/speed-of-light-variable.htm

http://www.livescience.com/29111-speed-of-light-not-constant.html

Mr. Blowhard himself stings himself in the ass.

For starters, Pirate's statement is basically true in a general sense, but you go and pull up references about specific conditions where there may be very slight variations in the speed of light.  The debating judges would take away points for sure.

The big sting number one on the blowhard:

A major part of the discussion in both studies is the nature of a vacuum, which on a quantum level is not, as most believe, empty. Rather, it is filled with the particle pairs.

Big sting number two on the big blowhard:

Two papers, published in the European Physics Journal D in March, attempt to derive the speed of light from the quantum properties of space itself. Both propose somewhat different mechanisms, but the idea is that the speed of light might change as one alters assumptions about how elementary particles interact with radiation. Both treat space as something that isn't empty, but a great big soup of virtual particles that wink in and out of existence in tiny fractions of a second.

Poor Kenny waddles around screaming how quantum particles are all BS and then he links to two papers that are all about quantum particles!   It's priceless.

The big fat blowhard makes himself look like a MORON because he says anyone that believes in quantum physics must be a moron.

You bloody idiot blowhard moron Kenny!   Your mind is tied to your behind!  Your mother wears army boots!

inductive medium of transmission

That's just a made-up expression by a bozo that doesn't even make any sense.  It's word salad for Kenny himself only.  You will never read that nonsensical expression except from Kenny and in the "movements" that he makes to produce his "books."

[joel321]

In the equation E=Mc squared, C is the constant for the speed of light.  If light were not constant then nuclear bombs would not explode...and we know that they do.

If everything is constant, why is everything evolving?

For sure the formula e=mc squared will be the same 100 years from now if you look in your crystal ball?

If you look at the history of time, the birth of e=mcsquared started from the gun powder. Since it started thousands of years ago, the powder formula for today is not static and will change in the future.

Please do tell how do you understand the speed of light?

Not to mentioned that a car going 30MPH where the earth is spinning at 1000MPH made any sense to you. And then I asked if the perimeter of the earth was 100 times it's size, would the same car be going at 30MPH in the perimeter of the 100 times the size of the newly earth...? lol...I would expect a lot of brain farting from you pirate

[TheoriaApophasis]

C is the constant for the speed of light.

Youre BATSHIT fucking insane.   


simplex EM diffraction thru a PRISM disproves THAT FUCKING BULLSHIT.




It may be noted that Maxwell's determination of this "proportionality
factor" gave rise to a NUMERIC value of one over c square. It is a faulty
inference to assume this factor is an actual velocity, or is the dimensional
relation of a velocity at all. Here given it is numeric. In the comparisons of
optics and electrodynamics it is found that a dielectric has the following
characteristics;


(1) Refractive Index
(2) Dielectric Inductivity
(3) Luminal Velocity



All three of these relations are exactly related to the velocity of light. But
here again is one over c square and actual velocity?
Maxwell's discovery of a factor of proportionality between dielectricity and
magnetism led to his theory of conjugate pair of inductions, dielectric




It has been developed thus far the general meaning of the concept One
Over c Squared. Hence a broader understanding of what is meant by the
"speed of light" has been obtained. The factor, c, is best not considered a
velocity, it is a proportionality ratio of time and space. By virtue of c being a
ratio it is dimensionally equivalent to a velocity, but c should not be
considered a velocity in and of itself.


Also given has been that light should not be considered a material
projection, it is not, light is not the "Cereal Shot From Guns". It has a
propagation of the medium itself. For a motional transmitter, the so called
"Doppler Effect" maintains the energy balance, raising the frequency in
proportion to the motional velocity of the transmitter. The wavelength
accordingly gets shorter. Thus the luminal velocity of the transmitted wave
is always c, a constant. The concept of "hysteresis, or velocity," was
touched upon.




Hence capacitance exists in a direct relationship with the velocity of light in a
given medium. Zero capacitance, infinite velocity.

Hereby this dimensional relation is given as:
Seconds Squared Per Centimeters Squared

This is to say, one over the speed of light squared, that is, one over c
squared. Here it is useful to take the speed of light as a unit value, or one.
See for example, C.P. Steinmetz's "Impulses, Waves, and Discharges",
chapter on "Velocity Measure." It is in this relationship between luminal
velocity and electro-static capacity that we find the luminal velocity
concepts of the relativists, the c squared in the E equals mc squared. Call it
a "dimensional fluke" if you wish. However, capacitance is forever married
to the velocity of light, to one over c squared.