Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[sadang]

@Raz

Those which are on this website for more than one year already know about Meyl. At least in my opinion is hard to not have heard about Meyl if someone really studied the Tesla work. On the other hand hope you convinced yourself that discussions with at least sarkeizen and profitis are totally useless they being on this forum just to manipulate info, to distort or redirect the discussions. Beings that should be ignored in the future, if you want to continue to learn something through your own effort. Now I think it's time to go back to the main theme of this topic, namely the magnetic vortex.

[profitis]

Sarkeizen:'For example TheoriaApoptosis (or whatever his name is), sandag, SeaMonkey, profitis, Magluvin, Joel,Cap-Z-ro,  the only way they survive is that they refuse to engage in the discussion.  For me, being able to force all of them to retreat to being unable to engage me.  Suits me just fine.'

Hey don't include me in that list I used modern school textbooks against you and you did not force me into any corner as I released easily repeatable verifiable experimentos to support theoretics.(Btw.not one human being has come back today to say to me: hey profitis,your oxygen experiments don't work) 

[profitis]

Sadang:'that discussions with at least sarkeizen and profitis are totally useless they being on this forum just to manipulate info, to distort or redirect the discussions.'

You've got to be shitting me,I just said it would help to bring critic-proof demo's to the thread OR no demo's at all.that's all I suggested

[Raz]

Sadang:'that discussions with at least sarkeizen and profitis are totally useless they being on this forum just to manipulate info, to distort or redirect the discussions.'

You've got to be shitting me,I just said it would help to bring critic-proof demo's to the thread OR no demo's at all.that's all I suggested

Critic proof demo's in the real world does not exist. There is always going to be someone saying that this or that is not , or that it could be done this other way. What you want is everything brought to you in a formula ready to be digested and used to your own profit. An easy "hey now I an use that to build that free energy machine - (whatever comes to your mind) electronic device. When Tesla brough his inventions and theories there was no critic-proof demos. Edison said ac electricity was dangerous and even electrocuted and elephant with AC to "prove"how bad was AC compared to DC. Others just simply did not understood Tesla and yet others knew he was right but could not accept it personally according to their knowledge and beliefs. Now,.. if there is a vortex in the magnet , and in the future in can be proved by additional means besides what Mr Wheeler showed , what would you do?? Would you find another failure to his ideas ? Will you tell him to explain it to you in formula? -- My point is that you are not going to be satisfied ever. And if you see some truth in it , why dont you use your shiny gray matter and  device and experiment yourself that can prove /disprove it???

[Raz]

@Raz

Those which are on this website for more than one year already know about Meyl. At least in my opinion is hard to not have heard about Meyl if someone really studied the Tesla work. On the other hand hope you convinced yourself that discussions with at least sarkeizen and profitis are totally useless they being on this forum just to manipulate info, to distort or redirect the discussions. Beings that should be ignored in the future, if you want to continue to learn something through your own effort. Now I think it's time to go back to the main theme of this topic, namely the magnetic vortex.

The reason I quoted Meyl was precisely because of the magnetic vortex:

-----------"  In his books, Prof. Dr.-Ing. Konstantin Meyl develops a self-consistent field theory which is used to derive at all known interactions of the potential vortex. Instead of the normally used Maxwell equation, Prof. Meyl chooses Faradays law of induction, as a hypothetical factor and proves that the electric vortex is a part thereof. This potential vortex propagates scalar-like through space and is a longitudinal electric wave whose properties have already been established a century ago by Nicola Tesla. This phenomenon can now be studied and examined thanks to a fully functional replica designed by Prof. Meyl.---------

-------Nikola Tesla was the biggest scientific genius in the last century. Today there is Prof. Dr. Konstantin Meyl from Villingen, Black Forrest, Germany. He has not only organized a revival of Tesla but developed his research to mindboggling levels. He detected that every vortex has a counterpart, a so-called potential vortex, being able to form matter. He shows that electrons, protons, neutrinos etc. are double vortexes, without needing a postulate. By that he proves that there are two more types of waves besides the already well-known electromagnetic wave (Hertz 1888). Tesla (1899) detected the electric scalar wave and Meyl the magnetic scalar wave, giving access to free energy, huge over-unity effects. The magnetic scalar wave, as an aspect of the neutrinos and therefore being faster than the speed of light, is used in all biology, so Meyl can explain how the DNA is sending information and energy as an antenna using a DNA wave.--------- This sounds in part like was Schauberger was doing when he was inducing implosion vortexes and the results he was obtaining.

I have not been here a year so could you point me in the right direction to and if anyone here got to an especific conclusion about Meyl? I just got his book but what I posted before says that he "shows that electrons, protons, neutrinos etc. are double vortexes, without needing a postulate"--

Im interested in knowing in this electric ( or dielectric ) scalar wave could be a counter vortex of the magnetic scalar wave and hence both can be represented as a double vortex like the one in W. Russel books.Thanks .