Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[sarkeizen]

Sarkeizen:'So your unstoppable argument would be destroyed if you labeled your necessary assumptions.'

I don't know.

So again you lose.    Thanks for giving up so easily.  Assumptions are part of an argument, the only question here is are they a necessary part of yours.   Since what was requested was to PROVIDE an argument.  The only case where you could be considered to have provided an argument is if you are saying your argument requires no assumptions whatsoever. Otherwise you have argued in bad faith. Which is just another way of saying "Profitis argued something."

Let me know which way you want to die.  It's been fun cornering you.

(Although if you're true-to-form your next move will be to simply go back and repeat your two statements and make some claim and then appeal to some imagined audience - like I said "used car salesmen" tactics )

[profitis]

Sarkeizen:'So your unstoppable argument would be destroyed if you labeled your necessary assumptions.'

It won't be destroyed if I don't.at least we know this.thus you only half-win.are we cool with this? 50/50?

[sarkeizen]

It won't be destroyed if I don't.at least we know this.thus you only half-win.

Nope.  You did NOT PROVIDE AN ARGUMENT unless your argument has no necessary assumptions.

So you failed. Again.  Want to go one more?   Happy to watch you fail again.

[profitis]

Sarkeizen:'Assumptions are part of an argument,'

I assume I'm 100% correct in my argument yes

[sarkeizen]

Sarkeizen:'Assumptions are part of an argument,'

I assume I'm 100% correct in my argument yes

...an argument that you did not provide.  So again, you failed.   Want to go one more?