Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[profitis]

Here's a thought that's equaly freaky: we ourselves are composed of these wobbly forces.we're just a bundle of forces! Holy shit

[sadang]

Sadang: Can you give me an exact reference of dielectricity being know today as electrostatics.

Hmmm! I don't want to repeat what I already said, so I'll just make a reference to a previous message:

I think the deep and right answer is in the book Occult Chemistry. My own view is somehow similar to what is learned now about electrostatics. Generally speaking, but do not want to get into details. That should be everyone's homework.

But please pay attention to the fact that my question was a rhetorical one, and do not necessarily require an answer!

I think what you are asking is how can you relate what we know of "conventional " electric theory to ether theory.

In a way yes. But in other way, I think is a madness to try to shape the ether according to any current theory. Is the same with trying to comprehend a cylinder analyzing only its circular or rectangular projection on a wall, that is, only analyzing its shadows, the circle or the rectangle. Rather exactly the opposite! The actual "conventional electric theory" is a product of ether and not viceversa, so we have to pay attention to the cylinder instead of its shadows. And if you really want to understand deep, will have to go further and to put in the knowledge equation the luminary, without which nothing exists, neither cylinder nor his shadows.

Raz, you can't understand the ether modalities only reading Faraday, Maxwell, Ampere, Thomson and others well known founders of the current scientific model. You have to understand that the current way is just a way from infinite other possible ways to shape the reality!

Or other way said, the nowadays electrostatics is the last or the lowest frontier that can be touched or mechanically (only in appearance) engineered by humans. Bellow this level, all phenomena become in a high degree observer dependent.

And finally you guess right, we both have to read much more.

[Raz]

Sadang : Thanks for your reply. I am not trying to " model " ether in any specific way , just trying to understand this new magnetic theory or may I say electromagnetic ether theory. I know that you see a lot of it in a way more than just material, and I agree with that. But even if we dont have to use the conventional " labels" , we do have to make a model to understand it , even if we have to say " polarities" while defining that a definitive polarity dont exist. But... if we want to make an experiment or machine , we have to accept convention , at least while we can develop  a whole new way to utilize what we learn. Tesla knew how to use the ether , but he also knew all the other theories around him at that time, including relativity. Only by studying them could he deny them. I dont think it is counterproductive to learn all the different theories. If you want to fix a radio or computer, you can use the conventional electronics theory, because that is what they used to design it. Now if you want to make an od generator, to build a magnifying transmitter , or an orgone receiver,then you use the theory that will fit what you want to do. How can we modify or use gravity? When conventional science dont have a clue of what gravity is?? They know what it does ,but they dont know how to handle it. So basically , we do need to understand Ken's theory , but also all the other theories until we learn one that will unify all the others or that will replace them. Meanwhile I have to deal with what is available. If electricity and electronic theory is going to change completely or there are other rules, we need to learn them. And we need to learn how to design and build with them. This is no small task.The  thing here is to use the necessary "tool" for the job to be done and not believe that because you always use a wrench, that 's all there is. While there is more discovery and transition we need to keep all our options open and try to do things in other way. That is the only way of growing exponentially. Have good day.

[sadang]

Sadang : Thanks for your reply. I am not trying to " model " ether in any specific way , just trying to understand this new magnetic theory or may I say electromagnetic ether theory

That's ok! It's your right! It was not my intent to upset you or to live with the feeling that I'm trying to impose something, or I know better than you. Far from me this thought! I only express my own opinions and should be treated as such. That's all I want to say: pay great attention to premises!

[profitis]

Raz:'task.The  thing here is to use the necessary "tool" for the job to be done'

Bingo.a new revolutionary theory has to be packaged correctly for advertising otherwise people cannot grasp anything.sadang is using too many emotional contexts to be able to grasp by most people.apophasis must use the 'all matter and waves are the same thing and do not cross lines with kinetic energy' vibe for his theory fulcrum as most people can pretty much grasp this simple concept.