Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[CycleGuy]

Below is a good basic explanation of what I've been saying. I came to the same conclusions by reading a *lot* of research papers. Kind of wish I'd found this long ago, it would have jump-started my quest for knowledge a bit. I arrived at my conclusions without knowing any of the terminology, nor any of the scientific underpinnings of physical phenomena, nor any of the math, nor even where to find any of the information... so it was a process of just searching a lot and figuring things out.

https://archive.org/stream/WhatIsAMagneticField/mfield_djvu.txt
http://www.oocities.org/dsligar.geo/mfield.html
https://ia601409.us.archive.org/27/items/WhatIsAMagneticFieldRev.April22010/mfield.pdf

What is the frequency of a permanent magnet's field?

F.A. Wilson explains in his book, From Atoms To Amperes (Bernard Babani publishing, London England c 1989) that in the case of the electromagnetic force, the exchange particle is the photon, and that from Einstein's and Planck's formula arises a relationship between the mass of a photon and the frequency of the light (visible or not) it represents.

Planck's formula: E=hf where:

E is the energy of a single photon,
f is the photon's frequency,
h is Planck's constant,

Einstein's formula: E=mc² where:

E is energy,
m is mass,
c² is the speed of light squared,

hence, hf=mc²

thus showing that the mass of a photon is directly proportional to the frequency of the photon.

E=hf and E=mc² so hf=mc²

Therefore, f=(mc²)/h

Because higher frequencies have more energy (E=hf), they deliver more mass (E=mc²). Einstein understood that light quanta (photons) are a mass transfer mechanism. The flux quanta (flowing particles) or photon exchange frequency is thus mass in motion and is the force of a magnetic field. The frequency and number of photons exchanged must be extremely high to exert physical attraction or repulsion.

The implication is that the frequency creates a force that is a physical mass connection, hf=mc². Different magnet compounds should have different frequencies since photons are emitted/absorbed by electrons. If an electron is throwing out a stream of photons while orbiting/spinning, you can visualize a corkscrew or helix stream of photons!

A photons wavelength is measured as a distance along a line through the center of the helix in one revolution around the helical trajectory. A flat projection side view of a helix looks like a sine wave.

Low frequency photons (such as radio waves) are often described in terms of wavelength (units in meters), while high frequency photons (such as
gamma particles) are often described in terms of particle mass energy (units in electron volts). As you increase the energy by increasing the frequency, you wind up with photons of more measurable mass. At the high frequency end of the electromagnetic spectrum are high energy photons known as gamma rays, which are streams of gamma particles. Beta particles are free electrons or positrons. Alpha particles are the nucleus of helium atoms.

In everyday life, you can understand that energy is proportional to frequency if you understand a concrete hammer drill will deliver more energy to the drill hole if it hammers at a frequency of 10 strokes per second instead of 1 stroke per second.

Is a magnet losing mass by emitting a field?

Stick a magnet to the bottom of a metal shelf. Watch it defy gravity. If it is defying gravity, it must be expending energy. By E=mc² it must be losing mass!

One may object to this by stating there is mass displacement, therefore work, and energy loss, but the flux quanta (flowing particles) of the magnetic field is an unobvious mass displacement itself.

Akira Tonomura's article on Electron Holography (Physics Today, April, 1990), contains a photo of magnetic vortices labeled "Seeing flux quanta" and states "Where two oppositely directed magnetization streams merge, they produce vortices similar to merging streams of water." Akira Tonomura is a winner of the Benjamin Franklin Medal for Physics.

Theoretical physicist and Nobel laureate Sheldon Glashow explains for PBS NOVA online (Einstein's Big Idea, October 11, 2005) that, "When an object emits light, say, a flashlight, it gets lighter." It has been calculated that every second, the Earth is struck by about 4.5 pounds of sun light.

Do magnets evaporate like black holes?

I find it interesting that iron (a strongly magnetic element) is the most massive element that can be produced during the fusion phase of a star's life. It takes a supernova to create all the elements beyond iron in the periodic table. A star's fusion phase starts with hydrogen and stops at iron which has the most tightly bound and thus most stable nucleus of all the elements. Iron 56 is at the top of the binding energy curve. On the curve, hydrogen is at the bottom to the left of iron, and the heavy elements such as uranium are at the bottom to the right of iron. I've seen one book that stated nickel 56 is really at the top of the binding energy curve. It is interesting that many meteorites are made of ferromagnetic elements, iron and nickel, blown out by stars that went supernova! Iron and nickel, with their tightly bound nucleus, seem to give virtual photons (flux quanta) a better grip for magnetic attraction when passing through.

The relative abundances of the elements in the periodic table drops off tremendously after nickel because supernova are relatively rare events in the history of our 13.75 billion year old universe.

A star with enough mass near the end of its fusion phase can go supernova, and may leave behind a neutron star, or a black hole, depending on the mass available. Certain magnetic rapidly rotating neutron stars, known as Magnetars, are believed to produce the strongest magnetic fields in the universe. A black hole is an object of such dense mass that it creates a gravitational field so strong that the escape velocity exceeds the speed of light! If black holes have a magnetic field, and it can get out, this seems to imply that virtual photons (flux quanta) can travel faster than the speed of light! Black holes may evaporate by a process known as Hawking radiation (named after Stephen Hawking who theorized it). Black holes may also evaporate by quantum tunneling. Quantum tunneling is when a particle penetrates a barrier which it ought not have enough energy to penetrate.

Where is the mass of these virtual photons from a magnet?

Force carrying photons are called virtual photons because unlike other real photons, they cannot be directly detected by a particle detector. In Feynman diagrams, virtual photons are symbolized by squiggly lines that never have loose ends. Magnetic lines of force curve back to the magnet and never have loose ends. This topology seems to imply there are no magnetic monopole particles. Virtual photons may be concentrated along magnetic lines of force (flux lines), which may be mass entanglements. Einstein stated, "The particle can only appear as a limited region in space in which
the field strength or the energy density are particularly high". The energy density is strongest where the lines of force are around a magnet, so that is
where the most virtual photons should be.

The range of electromagnetic force is thought to be infinite. The strength or intensity of an electromagnetic field decreases at a rate of 1 /distance² . This equation holds true for light from a point source, but not for force from a magnet which drops off at faster rates. This is probably because virtual photons from a magnet are following the flux lines and not traveling in straight lines like photons from a light bulb. You can measure force from magnets with a ruler and a grocery scale.

Could it be that force carrying virtual photons cannot be detected because they are in another dimension? Could their mass be smeared around the universe in another small dimension, with only force detectable in our normal size visible dimensions? (Magnetism as invisible plumbing behind our reality, non-locality, like Einstein's spooky action at a distance via EPR channels.) The Aharonov-Bohm effect also seems to demonstrate non-local effects.

The October 12, 1999 Time Travel episode of PBS's NOVA showed photons traveling at 1 .7 times the speed of light via quantum tunneling. This faster than light communication may imply travel through another dimension. A short distance traveled at the speed of light in a very small dimension could appear as a large distance traveled faster than the speed of light in our normal size visible dimensions. Quantum tunneling may be direct evidence of the other hidden dimensions in string theory.

Do the lines of force have a physical reality?

The magnetic lines of force have tension, as demonstrated by a magnet being suspended in air below a type-2 superconductor. The conventional explanation for this is flux pinning in the superconductor. The magnet hanging below the superconductor will swing back and forth on the tension of its flux lines (lines of force) which are somehow partly pinned in and partly expelled from the superconductor.

Flux line tension is the basis for proposals and research to use magnetic fields as solar wind sails to propel spacecraft. The force of the solar wind pushes against the magnetic field, and the tension of the flux lines transfers the force back to the spacecraft, dragging it through space like a sailing ship.

Does a magnet slow time?

Nobel prize winner Richard Feynman explains in his sum over histories interpretation of Quantum Mechanics that photons go where time is least. They follow the path of least time. Generally, this is a straight line, from point A to point B, if the effects of gravity and small constrictions are excluded. Einstein showed that gravity slows time, and that acceleration produces the same effects as gravity. Astronomers have observed that gravity bends light. Physicists have proven with atomic clocks and airplanes that gravity slows time. Clocks run slower at lower altitudes where gravity is stronger. Time is least (flows more slowly) where gravity is most. Gravity bends light because the photons are seeking or are pulled toward a path of least time, which is a path of more gravity! This space time curvature is the essence of General Relativity. Because we are talking about photons, this is also a link between Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity.

Could it be that virtual photons from a magnet follow the magnetic lines of force because this is their path of least time? Could it be that a magnet slows time by accelerating photons? Einstein asked himself the question: If gravity and acceleration feel the same, perhaps they are the same.

Kip Thome explains in his book, Black Holes and Time Warps that the electromagnetic field of an object contributes to the gravity of the object, because mass and energy are equivalent. Brian Greene explains in his book, The Elegant Universe (a 3 part PBS NOVA, Oct. 28, Nov. 4, 2003) that Maxwell's equations for the electromagnetic field are relativistic. This implies that an electromagnetic or magnetic field changes the rate at which time flows. The combined ideas of fields, quantum particles, and relativity produce what is known as relativistic quantum field theory.

Note the blurb above:

Because higher frequencies have more energy (E=hf), they deliver more mass (E=mc²). Einstein understood that light quanta (photons) are a mass transfer mechanism. The flux quanta (flowing particles) or photon exchange frequency is thus mass in motion and is the force of a magnetic field.

That photons are a mass transfer mechanism is why we have "virtual particles" popping in and out of existence, and why it's possible to concretize mass from the QVZPE field. Constructive interference of QVZPE field wave modes generates a "wave" energetic enough to temporarily concretize mass. That energy is then "smeared" out over a longer space and time as the concretized virtual mass is subsumed back into the QVZPE field.

As an analogy, think of a bathtub. You fill it half full. At 3/4 full, you put a shelf that has holes in it. Then you start making waves. Eventually, constructive wave interference will generate a wave large enough to reach high enough to throw some water on that shelf. As soon as the water gets onto the shelf, it starts draining back down. The water level is the QVZPE field, the waves are the QVZPE field modes constructively interfering, the shelf is our reality.

So there must be an energetic hurdle the QVZPE field must get over in order to concretize mass, so most of those particles are transitory in nature.


Can someone check my premise and math?

The QVZPE field has been measured with an energy density of 6 × 10E^-10 J/m³, or 3.74490548E¹⁰ eV/m³.

We know the element with the lowest ionization energy is Cesium, at 3.897 eV. So it's closest to "self-destructing" if hit with enough energy.

We know that Cs has an atomic radius of 260 pm (empirically measured). Thus, we could pack 38,461,538,461 Cs atoms along each axis of a cubic meter.

Thus, we'd have 5.68957669E³¹ Cs atoms per cubic meter, and a total ionization energy for the cubic meter of Cs of 2.17228038E³² eV/m³.

Thus, if we suddenly see all the Cs in the world spontaneously destructing, we'll know the QVZPE field radiation pressure has reached at least 2.17228038E³² eV/m³.

That gives us 3.817999 eV that the QVZPE field would have to increase to ionize Cs. Thus, the QVZPE field is at or less than 0.079001 eV.

So apparently the virtual particles that pop into existence are the result of constructive interference that tremendously increases QVZPE field density in a very localized region, forcing those virtual particles into existence briefly before the constructive wave interference collapses, allowing the virtual particles to disappear back into the QVZPE field.

I believe this is somewhat akin to the bathtub and shelf analogy I presented above, it "smooths out" or damps the QVZPE wave by "smearing" the energy of those constructively interfering waves over a longer time period as the virtual particle again becomes part of the QVZPE field. for constructively interfering QVZPE field modes that are able to reach the energy level sufficient to momentarily concretize mass.

[profitis]

"Throw every textbook away"

Me and the gal.we make two steaming hot huge mugs of coffie together and we go and sit down in the bedroom,steaming mugs in-hand.we put our mugs down on floor for one minute to allow for cooling.I lift my mug up from floor and begin sipping.she lifts her mug up and brings it to her lips.shock-of-all-shocks all of her coffie is gone,vanished.the whole 400mls.but the mug is still warm! We run around looking for evidence of spillage,but nothing.not a drop in sight on the floor.she leaps into my lap in terror,shivvering.this is a true story.two witnesses.neither witness under narcotic influence.how can physics explain this kind of shit,how,how...how

[citfta]

Obviously your cat likes hot coffee!

[profitis]

no pets back in '97 son.let's hear everyones paranormals testomonials.things that go beyond the physics textbooks but belong in physics textbooks hahaha whooooooooo spoooky vibes

[Kator01]

profitis,

"let's hear everyones paranormals testomonials.things that go beyond the physics textbooks but belong in physics textbooks hahaha whooooooooo spoooky vibes"


if you have time to read all 192 pages ( 2940 stories ?

http://allnurses.com/general-nursing-discussion/whats-your-best-108202.html



Kator01