Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

Started by TheoriaApophasis, July 13, 2014, 04:20:12 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 35 Guests are viewing this topic.

minnie




    The trouble is that nature leaves us humans standing when it comes to
mathematics.
    Quanta and harmonics rule!!!
  I've decided that Kelly's theory is fantasy.
            John.

sadang

Your problem minnie is you don't yet understand you are intrinsic part of the nature and not separate from it, and governed by the same rules as the nature is. And nature is not governed by quantum mechanics neither by particle physics, neither by dual aspects as opposed to each other, instead it is governed by complementary, of ether dynamics, whatever this ether you understand it is. But as always you have the right to choose what you want.

TinselKoala

Quote from: sadang on December 24, 2015, 02:34:13 PM
Your problem minnie is you don't yet understand you are intrinsic part of the nature and not separate from it, and governed by the same rules as the nature is. And nature is not governed by quantum mechanics neither by particle physics, neither by dual aspects as opposed to each other, instead it is governed by complementary, of ether dynamics, whatever this ether you understand it is. But as always you have the right to choose what you want.

YOUR problem is that you _think_ you understand things, but you really don't. And you seem to believe such utter BS that I'm surprised you can even operate a computer (which, by the way, would not work at all if many of the things you apparently believe, were actually true.)

As usual, there are thousands and thousands of experimental results, engineered systems and solid theoretical analyses that refute you (and Kenny) utterly on many separate points.


All of this is faked, according to you? How do you expect anyone to take you seriously at all?
http://www.space.com/22299-astronaut-sees-constellations-from-space-photos.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Examination_of_Apollo_Moon_photographs#Absence_of_stars

QuoteStars were seen by every Apollo mission crew except for Apollo 13. (An oxygen tank explosion in the Apollo 13 Service Module two days after launch prevented the crew from clearly seeing stars due to a haze of oxygen and water vapor surrounding the spacecraft.) Stars were used for navigation purposes and were occasionally also seen through cabin windows when the conditions allowed. To see stars, nothing lit by sunlight could be in the viewer's field of view.[3]


TinselKoala

Here's an image taken in the visible light range on ordinary film by the Apollo 16 astronauts. This refutes Lindeman's ridiculous statement utterly.

Of course you will say it is faked. And I'll just shake my head and wonder how you can even find your way to the grocery store.

http://tothemoon.ser.asu.edu/data_a/AS16/png/AS16-127-20022_SML.png

sadang

TinselKoala you laugh in vain! I do not pretend to know everything, but on the contrary claim that I know nothing exactly because I permanently document both sides, pro and con.

Can you compare the altitude of ISS with the distance to the Moon? 400Km is the same with 400000Km? ISS run in ionosphera (you know... aurora borealis) which is not the same as the Moon "atmosphere"! So, a photo taken in visual spectrum is not the same from ISS as from the Moon. While thermosphere and exosphere are large enough to make visible the light from star, the Moon has nothing to do this. Further think for yourself!

From hundreds of images with black sky made from the Moon surface you've chosen one which maybe has made on the way back, maybe from the same thermosphere. You're hilarious!

- http://tothemoon.ser.asu.edu/gallery/apollo/AS16_Hasselblad%20%2870%20mm%29/list

Because a shadow of a circle can also be a shadow of a square, shaping the reality (a computer for your sake) based on the circle doesn't mean it represent the reality. It only represent a reality as seen by those who see the circle, without to see the square. And what is sad is that no one try to see the real object which create that shadow! Thus, I'm a noob in computers, even if I see both shadows and even the object which create them. Something like seeing swap and shadow memory without seeing the ram.

Now, I suppose is my turn to laugh! Just I consumed this human joy years ago!