Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

Started by TheoriaApophasis, July 13, 2014, 04:20:12 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 35 Guests are viewing this topic.

joel321

minnie, you keep on asking questions BUT NEVER GIVE ANSWERS!

OLD matchmaker trying to be entertained! srry!

minnie




    go to Kelly Den Adel | Buddhist Books Blog for an insight.
    For me the CycleGuy has blown the whole thing out of the
    water.
     

joel321

minnie, lets seee your intelligence once and for all because you have to participate in the evolution of energy? Or, at least< in the crazy stuff people are throwing out here....STOP and once and for all speak about YOUR OWN THEORIES! NOT! what he said she said...lets hear what you have to say from all of this learning you have achieved? Speak your opinions! Don't reference anyone else! = You have to learn sometime!! hehehehe ...lets hear what you have learned...soooo someone else does not repeat it again! :)

joel321

Lement93rd, perhaps you may need to ask the question from where does magnetism come from? AND what does magnetism help in exchange for magnetic molecular exchange?

The moon having a protective layer and a "dangerous" layer? Common man! That is elementary...what type of element does not have a "dangerous" barrier!?

Water? Pffftt...drink 6 gallons a day? Pfft, 6 gallons of mud a day to water = what?

You need to MAP the ATOM! The atom is a 3D atom. And it gathers energy from the air too. It does not feed itself! The surrounding particles feed all atoms and sounds!

Just like your number 9! How do you think it got fed alllll the way to number 9? Well, it all started from the "big bang" of 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9 and thennn? 0 I already told you that a clock is a vortex too and ONLY a clock of the geometrical time and NOT the galactic time!

Human time is an illusion of space time. Space time breaks the laws of human time. HENCE, FREEE energy is all over around us. HENCE a magnet needs to eat energy and poop energy in order to maintain a magnet! You should already understand this stuff broh!

How does a 9 keep on being a nine when the earth is rotating around the sun at 66, 659 miles an hour? Do you even feel the perception of the speed? And how do you know that the sun speed is traveling around the universe?  And how do you know how fast the galaxy is traveling around the universe? And how do you know the universe is not traveling at 7 times the speed of light?

Now I am wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy thinking beyond magnetism....if I rewind back to this "vortex" of magnetism...what makes you think that the AC current is not a "sine wave"? If the sinne wave NEVER disipates, it must be coming from a hugggeeeee speaker?

EVERYthing points to FREEE energy and VORTEX-like! SO just take i t and progress further in this puny life!

sadang

Lesson 1 - ether:
- Ether is counterspace, and likewise cannot be IN SPACE, rather space is within the Ether when manifest in phenomena or polarized
- Ether is the inertial plane whose XYZ-axis is at every "point" in which space can be found within the Ether but not the inverse, but of course this Ether precedes space itself and defines space which is co-relational only to magnitudes (not mass, which is the domain of the Ether) and time
- Ether is the "ultimate" medium (Tesla often interchanged the term "medium" with "Ether") - being a perfect "fluid" and transporting independent carriers
- Ether is always trying to terminate back into counterspace, its origin and fulcrum, it is only by reciprocation, movements and countless other phenomena that it is "kept" in space (for a short while, but an eternity as measured by the life of any human)

Lesson 2 - modalities of ether:
- dielectricity is the Ether under stress or strain. The motions and strains of the Ether give rise to electrification. Phi times Psi gives Q;
- "electrons" do not mediate these electrical and magnetic forces or their likewise the Ether fields
- dielectric inertial plane is the basis for understanding dielectricity, counterspace, the creation of a magnet, AC transmission lines, and the entire spatial-counterspatial magneto-dielectric geometry that governs the entire cosmos
- magnetism is Ether in a state of dynamic circular polarization upon itself, is the radiative termination of electrical discharge
- gravity is centripetal and dielectric in basis
- electricity is Ether in a state of dynamic polarization
- electrons are a motional terminus of a quantity of dielectric pressure gradients of force

Lesson 3 - counterspace:
- Counterspace is literally the space between space itself, the very omnipresent membrane of the Ether which requires conjugate field forces to bring it into space or create electrical or dielectric, or magnetic phenomena, or the even the creation of matter
- counterspace is the fulcrum of phenomena and is the inertial plane, or membrane of the Ether from which all phenomena are manifest in space
- Counterspace is the noumenon, which when disturbed, gives rise to phenomena
- counterspace is the opposite of space
- Counterspace is just a conceptual means of speaking about the Ether plane, where everything is produced, and all fields are based in this "medium". Tesla knew this, Steinmetz, Heaviside, Maxwell, and even the fool Einstein, before he lost his mind, agreed that understanding is impossible without the Ether
- Counterspace is the opposite of any and all movement definitionally, only phenomena (as both meant and implicative of space) have movement, are divergent

Lesson 4 - space:
- Space is not a field and fails the scientific definition of either subject or object
- Space is only relational to masses and magnitudes and the distances between them
- Space is a dimensional abstraction
- Space is the vector of phenomena
- Space is the divergent remainder of counterspace in loss of its inertia in distension from its Ether fulcrum at which point we
differentiate this Ether modality as magnetism
- Space is movement, which is the loss of inertia which is space
- space is anything or has properties or is an entity with attributes to a principle we deem as "space". Ultimately this space is unwound in convergent bodies via gravity, or dielectric voidance, or centripetal charges
- Space is literally a rubber band, a seemingly (only so) static pressure awaiting dielectric (gravitational, inertial dielectric in a "magnet", or charge, as crudely called attraction) voidance to loose its inflation and impel objects and fields in increasing movement in rapid spatial deflation of contracting spheres of movement being unwound (i.e. space) towards increasing potential inertia and decreasing spatial discharges towards higher states of inertia potential
- Space is merely a posterior expression of polarization, and time is a posterior expression of space in measurement
- Space is definitionally movement and the byproduct of magnetic polarized field divergences
- space is only the attributional quality of movement which defines it
- Space is definitionally movement, relativity is a pure farce
- Space is wholly an unreal stereographic projection of inertia in discharge
- space is supported by and created by the loss of dielectric inertia
- Space is a terminal for nothing, and of nothing. Space has never "done anything", nor caused anything. Space is the
posterior attribute of fields

Lesson 5 - dielectricity:
- dielectricity is the fundamental Ether-modality of the entire cosmos
- dielectricity is the Ether under torsion and torque at its inertial plane
- dielectricity is counterspace
- dielectricity is the Ether boundary, the inertial plane, and the membrane at which only another conjugate polarized field can torque to create other phenomena
- dielectricity is counterspatial, is centripetal, is inertial and does not act on (most) other phenomena
- dielectricity is the conjugate of magnetism
- dielectricity is a versor in counterspace
- dielectricity is greater inverse to the space
- dielectricity is counterspatial, inertial, radial, and centripetal
- dielectricity is electropositive
- dielectricity is necessitatively divergent in discharge in an expanding circulatory fashion
- dielectricity is to gravitation as electricity is to magnetism
- dielectricity is the point causation for the creation of mass/gravity
- dielectricity is a superluminal radial and counterspatial inertial plane in the inter-atomic

Lesson 6 - dielectric inertial plane:
- dielectric inertial plane is the counterspatial XY-axis of non-opposition between magnetic circular reciprocation centrifugally and centripetally, which create, as is necessitated, binary CW and CCW field lines of motional disturbance. At the dielectric inertial line the two reciprocating magnetic field gradients are nullified and in equilibrium
- dielectric inertial plane is incommensurate within ANY and ALL magnets, as any child can prove in cutting a magnet along
the dielectric plane a trillion times (if it was possible) you will have a trillion more magnets with CW and CCW spin on either side and in the middle between the two a dielectric inertial plane, a "Bloch wall" in incorrect parlance. However in cutting a magnet even once perpendicular to the inertial plane you will not have moved the inertial plane, only bifurcated it in division (not actual division) between two new masses
- dielectric inertial plane is the rebounding point, acting like reflectors for the Ether bubble as meant the magnetic pressure CW and CCW movements
- dielectric inertial plane is the equator of a gravitational sphere, which can be seen from any field-viewing medium

Lesson 7 - magnetism:
- magnetism is Ether in a state of dynamic circular polarization upon itself
- magnetism is radiation, is definitionally the "dielectric field"- Faraday (and Maxwell)
- magnetism is the cause of the acceleration, rather inductive polarization by means of dielectric coherency
- magnetism is a pressure gradient of the Ether
- magnetism is a secondary response to dielectric forces
- magnetism is purely radiative, is the termination of electrification and the end-of-road byproduct of dielectricity
- magnetism is identical in that CW on CW approaches are a counter-voidance inertial plane torque of immense resistance.
- magnetism is only present as an attribute to another which is prior (however both are co-eternal and consubstantial, or "where there is one you will always find the other")
- magnetism is radiation by definition
- magnetism is the dielectric field – Michael Faraday
- magnetism is the discharge Ether modality of dielectricity in termination.
- magnetism is the radiative discharge of dielectricity, or electrification in discharge at which time it terminates AS magnetism in losing its dielectric component.
- magnetism is spatial
- magnetism is but one force itself, however as magnetism is purely spatial in denotation it is polarized but as one moving Ether "sink" and "bubble"; magnetism has but one movement not two, nor "two poles", CW and CCW are spatial abstractions of a singular movement of the magnetic field itself.
- magnetism is a spatial dimension
- magnetism is a versor solely of space (being circular, but not IN space, rather has an attributional quality OF space since a polarized Ether modality "contains space" but is not in space).
- magnetism is definitionally polarized, it moves as pressure dictates it must
- magnetism is the "dielectric field", is dielectricity in discharge, the radiation of same
- magnetism is a resultant of coherent inter-atomic dielectricity aligned to yield resultant polarized magnetic reciprocations
- magnetism is literally the polarized spatial "breaks" upon which the universe is self-regulating
- magnetism is the spatial "recoil" of electricity in termination, but is not the conjugate of electricity as conceived predominately as
"electromagnetism"
- magnetism is purely a spatial phenomena (as space) in circulation
- magnetism is almost rather literally a magneto-dielectric gyroscope in which the dilated inter-atomic dielectric "flywheel" created in electrification is counterbalanced by the centrifugal and centripetal (polarized) Z-axial magnetic aperture, which is the accurate model
of magnetism, up to a point
- magnetism is a spatial circular reciprocating vortex, an Etheric pair of fountains and countersinks
- magnetism is definitionally spatial movement
- magnetism is a versor with (space in the field) space
- magnetism is the basis for the quadrature of the universe
- magnetism is a spatial field
- magnetism is a spatial conjugation, a polarization moving outwards in increasing and decreasing pressure gradients towards the dielectric inertial plane, whereas the centripetal counterspatial dielectric increases towards electro-stable generation and is discharged, or terminated in mass and resultantly gravity.
- magnetism is, of course, merely a polarized Ether bubble from electrification (not "magnetization" as conventionally understood by the common person) of the iron, or neodymium-iron-boron mass, or in an electromagnet, or as is the case in the inter-atomic magneto-dielectric
volume
- magnetism is merely the model expression of Ether polarization in a spatially reciprocating circular
- magnetism is spatial, circular, centrifugal (and centripetal) and polarized
- magnetism is literally the polarization of dielectricity
- magnetism is strictly an end product of dynamic polarization into static radiative polarization, or as the byproduct of dielectric saturation which expels the resident magnetism in a system
- magnetism is created as a byproduct of dielectric manipulation, either by electrification into a mass which distorts the dielectric (meaning acceleration and capacitance) and likewise in turn the magnetic, or as the necessitated conjugate to electrification in TEM
- magnetism is Ether in preturbative movement
- magnetism is a posterior resultant to a prior which is dielectric coherency
- magnetism is by nature the rotary polarized terminus of electricity, a waste product and necessitated conjugate terminal of charge-discharge terminals of natural electrical inertia and momentum
- magnetism is a hyperbolic torque (tension) by which the Ether modality of inertia in discharge mediates its own discharge in creating the hyperboloid of magnetic centrifugal divergence against the inertial "line" of the dielectric inertial plane of the so-called "magnet" (the coherent dielectric object) and mediates this pressure by polarized reciprocation and transverse reintegration once inertia has been regained
- magnetism is the necessitated spatial expression of inertial loss of dielectricity, which causes spatial reciprocation as the Ether modality of magnetism after which time it must terminate where dielectric voidance is lowest, centripetally on the other pole.
- magnetism is the radiation, the hyperboloid spatial vectorization and polarization of dielectricity in discharge
- magnetism is a circumferential force

Lesson 8 - gravity:
- gravity is the terminal of dielectricity (as mass in creation, atrributionally gravity after the fact)
- gravity is at the counterspatial (directively, but accumulatively spatial, as mass) all-P radial-axis with magnetism, electricity and dielectricity comprising every point within its sphere. As mass centrifugally accumulates, gravitation centripetally reciprocates within the expanding radius of its field
- gravity is centripetal and dielectric in basis, as the terminator of the dielectric

Lesson 9 - electricity:
- electricity is Ether in a state of dynamic polarization
- electricity is utterly a mass-free phenomena, as mentioned by many including Dr. Wilhelm Reich in his "Cosmic Superimposition". Mass has no logical or theoretical place in electrical units and all particle-based conceptions of it are impossible. There is no mass in T.E.M. (transverse electromagnetism)
- electricity is the dynamic radial or reciprocating polarization of the Ether
- electricity is comprised of two components:
--- dielectricity – generated by a capacitor, counter-space phenomena; storage and return of dielectric energy
--- magnetism – generated by a coil of wire, decaying electricity, spatial phenomena; storage and return of magnetic energy; electro-motor force;lines per second
- electricity is the product of Phi (magnetism) and Psi (dielectricity), is definitionally a hybrid Ether modality of the product of Phi and Psi
- electricity is the product of electrostatics and magnetism, as meant dielectricity and magnetism (F x ? = Q, or electrification)
- electricity is a hybrid Ether-modality of F x ?
- electricity is a hybrid of both magnetism and dielectricity in a circuit working together to create electricity
- electricity is the dynamic radial or reciprocating polarization of the Ether
- electricity is centripetal towards the nucleus
- electricity is Phi x Psi (dielectric and magnetic)
- electricity is a spherical centripetal force

Lesson 10 - electron:
- All "electrons are a motional terminus of a quantity of dielectric pressure gradients of force (as reified by the incorrect understanding of the definition of a "field"), these pressure gradients, or "lines" are contracting and stretching like rubber bands, giving motion to the terminus "electron".
- "electrons" have nothing to do with the flow of electricity; the so-called "electrons" are the rate at which electricity is destroyed.
- electron is only a shadow; its apparent-only physical mass is merely an electrical momentum (ejected by the dielectric inertia in disturbance).
- To describe an "electron as a negatively charged body is equivalent to saying that it is an expanding-contracting particle. There is no such condition in nature as a negative charge, nor are there negatively charged particles. Charge and discharge are opposite conditions, as filling and emptying, or compressing and expanding are opposite conditions." – W. Russell
- Thomson developed the "Ether Atom" ideas of M. Faraday into his "Electronic Corpuscle", this indivisible unit. One corpuscle terminates on one Faradic tube of force, and this quantifies as one Coulomb. This corpuscle is not an electron, it is a constituent of what today is known incorrectly as an electron. (Thomson relates 1000 corpuscles per electron). In this view, that taken by W. Crookes, J.J. Thomson, and N. Tesla, the cathode ray is not "electrons, but in actuality corpuscles of the Ether." – E. Dollard
- "electrons" represent energy dissipation. However, the cult of quantum, and the ill informed fool all tell us that the "electron" is a subatomic particle and charge carrier, and is that which conveys energy, this is complete irrational nonsense!
- There is no rest mass to an "electron". It is given here the "electron" is no more than a broken loose "hold fast" under the grip of the tensions within the dielectric lines of force. They are the broken ends of the split in half package of spaghetti. Obviously this reasoning is not welcome in the realm of Einstein's Theory of Relativity. – E. Dollard
- Unfortunately to a large extent in dealing with dielectric fields the prehistoric conception of the electro-static charge, the "electron", on the conductor still exists, and by its use destroys the analogy between the two components of the electric field, the magnetic and dielectric. This makes the consideration of dielectric fields unnecessarily complicated - C.P. Steinmetz (Electric Discharges, Waves and Impulses)
- The idea of electricity as a flow of "electrons" in a conductor was regarded by Oliver Heaviside as "a psychosis". This encouraged Heaviside to begin a series of writings
- "electrons as a separate, distinct entity... doesn't really exist, they are merely bumps in something called a "field". - Dr. Steve Biller
- Also consider the J.J. Thomson concept of the "electron" (his own discovery). Thomson considered the electron the terminal end of one unit line of dielectric induction.
- The so-called "electrons" are not particles, not objects or subjects but are the dynamic principle of discharge, and are certainly not charge-carriers, fields are not particles, are not "electrons", nor assuredly are there energy discharges in the vacuum of space involving "electrons"; the "electron" is a fiction of fallacious observation and an even more faulty mental acuity, spawned naturally from the minds of materialists, or an Atomist.
- There are no "electrons" in or comprising an atom, as has been amply mentioned.
- There are however no "electrons", this fundamental error carries on today.
- Since we know "electrons" are not particles, but a misunderstanding of magneto-dielectric fields in motion, we can examine atomic orbital geometry with perfect lucid clarity.
- It was found that the orbiting "electrons" around a nucleus could not be fully described as particles, but needed to be explained by the wave-particle duality. In this sense, the "electrons" have the following properties:
(What this really means is that enormous evidence against the electron-bead model of the atom forced another quantum "Alice in Wonderland" answer from the cult of quantum to explain atomic geometry, this time as "wave particle duality" absurdity.)
Wave-like properties:
--- 1. The "electrons" do not orbit the nucleus in the sense of a planet orbiting the sun, but instead exist as standing waves. The lowest possible energy an electron can take is therefore analogous to the fundamental frequency of a wave on a string. Higher energy states are then similar to harmonics of the fundamental frequency.
(What this really means is that the so-called "electron" is a magneto-dielectric field whose wave/undulatory mechanics are dependent upon the nucleal makeup)
--- 2. The "electrons" are never in a single point location, although the probability of interacting with the electron at a single point can be found from the wave function of the electron.
(What this really means is there is no such thing as an electron outright, it has no point, no locus, therefore cannot be a particle, and yet the magnetic and dielectric interactions can be explained by wave functions.)
Particle-like properties:
--- 1. There is always an integer number of "electrons" orbiting the nucleus.
(This is purely conjecture and speculation)
--- 2. "electrons" jump between orbitals in a particle-like fashion. For example, if a single photon strikes the "electrons, only a single "electron" changes states in response to the photon.
(This is purely conjecture and speculation, what this means is if another dielectric outside charge strikes the atom its charge state geometry changes in response to the change in charge, creating an imbalance in the inter-atomic magneto-dielectric volume)
--- 3. The "electrons" retain particle like-properties such as: each wave state has the same electrical charge as the "electron" particle. Each wave state has a single discrete spin (spin up or spin down).
(This is nonsense, even under the heading of particles, they cannot escape the fact that the so-called "electron" has no particle-nature, no reality as such)