Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

Theoria have you tried, or considered suspending your giant neo magnet
and letting your new solution reset while under the neo? 
Might be interesting to watch.

Mike

The Giant NEO is heavy and a dangerous beast, BUT, the giant neo has LARGE VOLUME of magnetism (N48) over a LARGE AREA
However its velocity is low, relatively, at the centrifugal edge.

Also such a HUGE magnet, has a LARGE intermediate centrifugal field between centripetal and centrifugal

It has impressive volume of magnetism, but its power is mostly around its "danger" of hurting you.
However, its volume is so large, it affects a CRT tube from 15 feet away.

[picowatt]

Actually however very kind and very giving in person.  (Too kind and too giving actually).

You'd have a very hard time proving this based on your many abusive posts in this thread.

It was, at least, good for a chuckle...

[TheoriaApophasis]

You'd have a very hard time proving this based on your posts in thread.

It was, at least, good for a chuckle...

You dont know me son, you never talked or met me. 


Again, I really dont care.   I've got some mind blowing stuff I've invented I havent even mentioned in this entire thread.    And wont.



A:  Im not selling ANYONE ANYTHING

B: Dont care what you think, feel, believe about me OR the work.

C:  Go experiment yourself, go do the work.

D: Popularity contests are for -    Hookers, Politicians, Actors, and someone you are DATING........... I am none of those.


If you wanna piss and moan about a book I gave away for free,   FINE.     
Still, not selling you anything,   not trying to convince you of anything.


Go find out for yourself.

[MileHigh]

Tinman:

Not sure if you have moved on in your set of experiments but let me suggest this:

With the electromagnet you notice that the core has what appears to be a bit less than one centimeter of exposed shaft on each end.  Note that the one centimeter of exposed shaft gives you two surfaces that allow for current flow into the electrolyte, the flat top surface and the cylindrical side surface.  It appears that that specific geometry for the exposed current-conducting surfaces will allow current to flow into the electrolyte in nearly the same 3D pattern as the magnetic field.  In other words, the current flow vectors and the magnetic field vectors line up very nicely like this and therefore you get no vortex.

I also note that you did a clip where the magnet (I think) was wrapped in tape so only the flat top surface was exposed and you still got a vortex, but it was clearly different from the first vortex you observed.  Knowing that, it would tend to suggest that if you used insulating tape on the ends of the electromagnet core such that only the top and bottom flat surfaces where exposed, then you will likely observe a vortex.

It would appear that with the electromagnet, the particular geometry was a "fluke" and you got no observable vortex.  It's fascinating how geometry has come into play in such a dramatic way in this particular example.

If you are temped to make the test you may want to simply create a new thread to avoid the high-strung feeling on this thread.

MileHigh

[TinselKoala]

As a consumate expert of Platonism, translator of ancient Greek, expert on PLOTINUS, PROCLUS, DAMASCIUS, SYRIANUS, their works, and their methods, and all the various types of Skepticism, and Atomism they dealt with, I know EVERY SINGLE rancid angle you have, or WILL have , or could have.

(sic)
All that... and you still don't know how to enable your spellchecker?