Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

, since he denies the existence of electrons. He will have trouble describing what the electron beam guns

Your mind doesnt work well son.   Tesla used the term electron. However he also DENIED that same was a particle.     

You've committed the fallacy of REIFICATION.


There are no electron beam guns, son.    I know EXACTLY what they emit.


The 'electron microscope' lie

There are no negatively "charged" particles in this universe. Negative electricity discharges while positive electricity charges. The
negative depolarizing force functions in the opposite manner and direction to the positive polarizing force.

"Always question the academic who tells you he's manipulating particles that nobody has never witnessed. Countless particles are
created in the Atomistic religion of quantum as demonstrable redesignations of electrical and magnetic effects and fields. An entire
academic pantheon of liars is established to perpetrate this nonsense."

"Because the SEM (scanning electron microscope) utilizes vacuum conditions and uses 'electrons' to form an image, special
preparations must be applied to the sample. All water must be removed from the samples because the water would vaporize in the
vacuum. All metals are conductive and require no preparation before being used. All non-metals need to be made conductive by
covering the sample with a thin layer of conductive material. This is done by using a device called a "sputter coater". The sputter
coater uses an electric field and argon gas. The sample is placed in a small chamber that is at a vacuum. Argon gas and an electric field
cause an 'electron' to be removed from the argon, making the atoms positively charged. The argon ions then become attracted to a
negatively charged gold foil. The argon ions knock gold atoms from the surface of the gold foil. These gold atoms fall and settle onto
the surface of the sample producing a thin gold coating "


Only conductive (metal) samples are suitable for "electron" microscopy untreated, all other samples are metal treated to prevent
them from burning up in the intense dielectric beam. The resulting image is therefore of the metal coating or stain and not the original
sample! Never believe a relativist telling you he's "shooting his electron gun". A metal dielectric reflector of a once living organism is
not the original sample nor are there electrons scanning it. This device in reality is a dielectric scanning reflector, which produces fine
images as only reflected off metal surfaces. The very focusing beams of these microscope are constrictor "lenses" of dielectric flux
lines.


Even the idiot Einstein understood the BS and implication of a "discharge particle" :

"In the theoretical treatment of these electrons we are faced with the difficulty that electro-dynamic theory by itself is unable to
give an account of their nature." "For since electrical masses constituting the electron would necessarily be scattered under the
influence of their mutual repulsions, unless there are forces of another kind operating between them the nature of which has hitherto
remained obscure to us." - Einstein on electrons; "Relativity", by Albert Einstein, Random House Publisher, 1916



You lost that one,  NEXT

[TinselKoala]

Wrong again, buddy boy. You can shout and moan and insult all you like, but you can't deny the existence of electron microscopes, or CRT electron beam guns! They don't actually care if you redefine them.. they are what they are and you are utterly and stupidly wrong. But your insufferable ego will never let you rest. You are the next most textbook example of the Dunning-Kruger effect.

Go ahead, you still haven't provided the reference for your stupid assertion about Maxwell, Heaviside, ee texts saying dielectricity is electrical inertia, and you still cannot design anything with your "theory" that can't be done with conventional electrical engineering and physics. The proof is in the DOING and you cannot do.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Faradic Tube of Force. Quantifies as One Coulomb.

Those were the words of JJ Thomson himself,   NOT E. Dollard.


Lost again,   insert 25 cents more and try again.

[TinselKoala]

Those were the words of JJ Thomson himself,   NOT E. Dollard.


Lost again,   insert 25 cents more and try again.

Keep it up, silly boy. You are just digging yourself in deeper and deeper. Go ahead and show a MODERN REFERENCE to a "faradic tube of force" and show how it "quantifies" to one Coulomb. You cannot.

Since the charge of one electron is known to be about 1.60217657×10⁻¹⁹ coulombs, a coulomb can also be considered to be the charge of roughly 6.241509324×10¹⁸ electrons (or protons), the reciprocal of 1.60217657×10⁻¹⁹.

Go ahead, refute that.

[TheoriaApophasis]

conventional electrical engineering and physics. The proof is in the DOING and you cannot do.

ad hominem and baseless claims.    I retired at 32, Ive been experimenting all my life.


I didnt deny the "electron microscope" son,  only yours and others BS definition of what is being emitted.

ALL subjects in said microscope that aren't metallic, are coated in a CONDUCTOR.


Yes, as necessitated to make a dielectric imaging device.


"To describe an electron as a negatively charged body is equivalent to saying that it is an expanding-contracting particle. There is
no such condition in nature as a negative charge, nor are there negatively charged particles. Charge and discharge are opposite
conditions, as filling and emptying, or compressing and expanding are opposite conditions."

Thomson developed the "Ether Atom" ideas of M. Faraday into his "Electronic Corpuscle", this indivisible unit. One corpuscle
terminates on one Faradic tube of force, and this quantifies as one Coulomb. This corpuscle is not and electron, it is a constituent of
what today is known incorrectly as an "electron". (Thomson relates 1000 corpuscles per electron) In this view, that taken by W.
Crookes, J.J. Thomson, and N. Tesla, the cathode ray is not electrons, but in actuality corpuscles of the Ether."


With the introduction of the so-called 'electron' by Thomson and the supposed debunking of the Ether theory, the golden age of
electrical discovery ended. Tesla's Wardenclyffe tower was demolished. His work and that of other Ether researchers fell into
disrepute. They were relentlessly attacked by mainstream science, something that continues to this day. As a result, the days of Etherdriven,
electrical discovery petered-out, finally ending around 1930. As a direct and intentional result of the academic physics theory,
the methodology behind the brilliant inventiveness of previous generations was all but wiped out and replaced by an unproductive
particle physics. This, from the cult of quantum, a fraudulent collusion and academic hubris-based pseudo-conspiracy based in "deep
thinking insanity" designed by mathematical physics.


You lost again.   Insert 25 cents more.