Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

Started by TheoriaApophasis, July 13, 2014, 04:20:12 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 36 Guests are viewing this topic.

gravityblock

Hi TheoriaApophasis,

I'm interested in how to instantly dump the momentum of an object without any resultant inertia or effects on the subject (see snapshot below as found on page 43).  Theoretically, if we can instantly transfer the whole momentum from a heavier object to a lighter object, then we can make as much excess energy as we like according to KE = 0.5 * mv2.  You said this may be accomplished from a non-local inductive source.  Are you willing to point me to this source?  If not, then I will seek it out on my own!   

A 5 kg mass moving 1 m/s has 5 units of momentum and has a kinetic energy of 2.5J.  A 1 kg mass moving 5 m/s has 5 units of momentum and has a kinetic energy of 12.5J

12.5J > 2.5J !!!

Thanks,

Gravock
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result.

God will confuse the wise with the simplest things of this world.  He will catch the wise in their own craftiness.

MileHigh

You are still not understanding the twisting of the picture on the CRT screen.

Here is the answer:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gdh2srqH57M&list=UU6x7DywfEqLg-3Cg_JnyTlg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w41Zijsv46o&list=UU6x7DywfEqLg-3Cg_JnyTlg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcVzfTAK8fk&list=UU6x7DywfEqLg-3Cg_JnyTlg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bG2aQUD8xt0&list=UU6x7DywfEqLg-3Cg_JnyTlg

There is no "magnetic vortex" at all.  The magnetic field from your stationary magnet in front of the CRT screen will be stationary, static and unchanging.  The electron beam gets deflected because of V cross B and that results in a Moire pattern on the screen because of the electron beam passing through the "wrong" holes in the shadow mask resulting in the "wrong" colour phosphors being illuminated.  Sometimes the beam is bent but you don't get a Moire pattern and instead you get a twisted image.  It's the stuff of a Grade 7 science fair project.

So why do you get the big black area and the bright white area in the center?

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: MileHigh on July 17, 2014, 02:51:08 AM
There is no "magnetic vortex" at all.  The magnetic field from your stationary magnet

Im so sorry you have NO idea what you're talking about.  A learning defect of some variety I assume.


Actually its just garden variety hubris to be sure.

A: As per the CRT, you might notice (which you did not), that there are 2 twisted fields, one along the centrifugal (as see by anyone with eyeballs) and one OPPOSITE along the centripetal. As such your logomachy doesnt "fly".   (SEE PICS BELOW)

B: If you think for 1 second there is any such thing as a "stationary magnetic field" (forgetting for a second about a VORTEX), then the late N. Tesla, Heaviside, Maxwell, and others would like to boot you for that insanity.

C:  Its alas unfortunate that your purposeful selected memory left out the last post in which I stated I have 8 DIFFERENT DEMONSTRATIONS of vortex movement

only 1 of which is CRT.


I notice you left out that 800 pound gorilla I planted on your head in the last post.


Suggest you read people that actually know what theyre talking about
Tesla,  JC Maxwell, Oliver Heaviside, CP Steinmetz.     You know nothing about magnetic reciprocation.



Quote from: MileHigh on July 17, 2014, 02:51:08 AMSo why do you get the big black area and the bright white area in the center?

You see, son, I actually DO the experiments, you think you understand but you dont.

IF placed ONLY on the centrifugal edge you will GET NO BRIGHT SPOT IN THE CENTER, absolutely NOTHING.   ;D  ;D  ;D

however you can see that in an upcoming video.   I love they way you assume things.   The bright spot in the center, son, only appears when there is a centripetal magnetic vortex present.

And ONLY then.       You amuse me.   What you dont know is that you are trying to convince yourself of your own nonsense, not me of yours (nonsense that is).







Quote from: MileHigh on July 17, 2014, 02:51:08 AMand instead you get a twisted image.

What a sad soul you are, son.  ;) Your twisted-mind twisted-image pseudo-pontification leaves out the fact that a TWISTED image doesn't INVERT ITS TWIST at the center from centrifugal movement to centripetal, and/or vice verse as I amply demonstrate.

100% failure on your part herein.



By the way son,  ANY magnetometer will tell you about centrifugal and centripetal GAUSS reading differentials.

start watching at 2:50
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTWYAFJuq7M&list=UUh3cY-IW8QsEFmAh-TAWwrw



I am sorry you have no idea in the least what you are talking about.   I do love the fact that you failed to mention:

I have (now) 8 different physical models for proof of the vortex pattern

charged graphite
CRT
ferrofluid in alcohol with microbeading
precession centripetal countermagnetic movement
bismuth dust in mineral oil



You aren't trying to convince ME of anything, rather convince YOURSELF of your well-accepted and closed minded insane assumptions about what you THINK you know about magnetism, but, in fact, have no idea.



TheoriaApophasis


Heads up son
. I am adding 2 more videos of magnetic vortex movement tonight that have NOTHING to do with CRT tubes, AND use 2 wholly different testing materials.

   ;D ;D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6je5P1BOp3A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfqNkmqXfn4

veni vidi vici , son

"People that surround themselves with those who only agree with them are demons and afraid of their ignorance being refuted" - Jennings



AND,  5 more videos upcoming using 5 WHOLLY different testing materials.


Maybe, in your logomachy and hubris, you can attempt (and fail) to discount the 7 other methods.



You do amuse me, but keep trying to convince yourself.   


I do the experiments, and you talk. 


Which do you think is the more useful, the more valuable?    ;D  ;D

HERE IS A VIDEO I COLLECTED EXACTLY FOR PEOPLE LIKE YOU:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45a75U5yOP0


AND THE BEST OF THEM, JUST FOR YOU:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aLJMqSAkXEc

;D


"Scientists today think deeply rather than clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane.
Todays scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander thru equation after equation, and eventually build a
structure which has no basis in reality." – Nikola Tesla

"Nothing is more fantastical and a travesty of how nature works than is quantum theory. Its very basis has no relationship to reality."

Cap-Z-ro

TA,

My thanks in in someone (you) finally putting that long winded loud mouthed schnook in his place.

Its just a shame a few of the others didn't take a kick at the tar baby.

Regards...