Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[MileHigh]

SeaMonkey:

You lose perspective so easily it's not funny.  It's like you are hard-wired to believe that "the alternative guy must be right" even when you have to deal with an internal dichotomy.  You have enough technical knowledge to know that the vast majority of what Theoria is stating is quite frankly "crazy whackadoo nonsense."  You know that he is wrong but your hard-wiring takes over and you will defend the underdog, because defending the underdog is more important than what's right and what's wrong.  So you have an internal conflict and what always wins is the "alternative guy."  And that is your great flaw, you support things that you know are wrong because you are against "the system."

The Attackers here are very skilled at provoking confrontational exchanges;

Indeed, you can't even think straight sometimes because of that hard wiring.  I am not "attacking" Theoria, I am challenging his propositions because they are a form of "knowledge pollution" and people deserve to hear both sides in a debate.

They seem to think their privileged status exempts them from the rules of good order and discipline."

You must be talking about Theoria?  Whoops, I guess you are alleging that I am the one breaking the rules.  When did I ever say or imply I had a privileged status?  Your hard-wiring distorts your perception.  When you post things like that you sound like the worst of the worst of the "Powers-that-Be spin doctors."  It's like reading Pravda in 1972.

Nothing is more pathetic than a Forum Man who can dish it out but can't take the blowback."

You can kiss my ass when you use the term "Forum Man" trying to imply that I am some sort of "paid operative" that's here to rebut nonsensical stuff like you are reading in this thread.

Ultimately, you are messed up in the head.  Like you walked head-first into the barrel of a 16-inch gun in 1963 and you never recovered from the very serious concussion you received.

Stop trying to imply that I am something that I am not.  Stop trying to imply that I am devious and intentionally attacking Theoria.  Let your innate knowledge and understanding about electronics overcome that messed up hard wiring in your head.  It's the same hard wiring that turns you into that "apocalypse is coming, the great battle between good and evil is almost upon us" guy standing on a virtual street corner holding up a 10-year-old placard that says, "The End is Nigh."

What ridiculous and dark and dreary spinning you can do when your hard wiring takes over.  You look at a thread like this and you go into overdrive and you suppress your own innate technical intelligence that is telling you that I am just arguing the common sense straight goods and Theoria is just one of hundreds of guys that has miraculously "discovered" the "secret" of magnetism.  You know just as well as me that he can't back anything up but like some self-programmed drone you support him anyways.

There is something really creepy in you that gives me the shivers.  You are your own Cabal unto yourself and nobody should drink your Kool-Aid.  Rather, they should run away as fast as they can.

MileHigh

[gravityblock]

According to Faraday himself on page 136 in a publication titled, "Experimental researches in electricity / by Michael Faraday", the outward force or pressure acting on the rotating wire piece can not be attributed to the fictitious centrifugal force.  If the outward force was due to the centrifugal force alone, then the distance between the rotating wire piece and magnet would not increase as the speed of revolution decreases (see the snapshot of page 136 below).  This outward pressure in addition to the torquing force is more evidence of a magnetic vortex.

Gravock

In the original Faraday motor, the current carrying conductor is pushed away from the magnet by an outwards force which can be attributed to a pressure wave.  This shows a field in motion around the permanent magnet.  Figure 1 shows a pressure wave associated with the magnetic potential A vector and the magnetic flux B field. The A vector and the B vector are normal (90 degrees) to each other and both are also normal to the outwards moving pressure wave.  It has been demonstrated that a strong enough magnetic field can suspend a live frog with the associated pressure wave of that same field without harming the frog. The pressure wave works on the individual particles on the quantum scale in a collective manner much as gravity does.  The pressure wave will increase as the square of the current. For a 100 ampere current, the value will be 10,000 times larger than a 1 ampere current. The adjacent current element may be used to cause a directional projection of the force field resulting from the pressure wave and the fixed current element. This current element can also move if free to do so.  The external current element can be used to introduce asymmetry into the uniform pressure field and therefore cause a force unbalance that can do work on the system so as to move it in the desired direction.

The outward moving pressure wave is divorced from the magnetic field proper and therefore can be used to move the entire system via Newton's law of every action engenders an opposite and equal reaction even if the magnet and the current are connected to a common support. This is by reason that the pressure wave has its own inertia and can be regarded as a separate entity, much as for a photon.  The Faraday motor as demonstrated uses a permanent magnet and a d.c. current in the rotor wire. The direction of rotation should remain the same if the direction of the magnetic flux from the magnet as well as the direction of current flow in the rotor wire are both changed simultaneously. Further, the direction of the pressure wave will also continue to be moving outwards. This may be an advantage from the standpoint of resonance where a strong impulse can cause a resonant circuit to ring in the form of a damped wave and if the circuit has low losses, the resonance will allow for the alternating current to continue without further input for an appreciable time. The frequency of resonance may be chosen to be equal to the f_MG frequency. Thus, the magnet can now be an electromagnet and capacitor arrangement.

Reference:  The Faraday Motor And The Magnetic Vector Potential, by Jerry E. Bayles  (see snapshot below for a quick reference)

Gravock

[TheoriaApophasis]

This type of force is associated with describing motion in a non-inertial reference frame, and referred to as a fictitious or inertial force

True, the centrifugal magnetism is being 'driven' by the dielectrical inertial plane at the midpoint of every magnet.

Yes, this centrifugal is a "FAKE" inertial force.

magnetism is definitionally radiation of and within the magneto-dielectric inter-atomic, a  "magnet" only makes this fundamental Aether force VERY APPARENT to us dumb human critters.

with no reaction-force counterpart

Its (centrifugal magnetism) reaction force counterpart is merely itself which moves CENTRIPETALLY within its own spatial (=polarization) recriprocation.

But this is one system-whole,  it is not ANOTHER force, but the SAME, however 180 degrees opposite the centrifugal field

Its movement of course is NET-0

Moving this NET-0 however is moving SPACE itself (the posterior attribute of ANY and all fields), and such we get electrification due to superluminal "breaking" upon the dielectric plane within copper windings.

[TheoriaApophasis]

From what I can tell.......David LaPointe,

Like *@&^@^^!@ HELL......David LaPointe  is FULL OF SH*T    

Yes, I know his videos well. Theyre well made, and HALF right.


However he misses the 800 pound gorilla that "DRIVES" magnetism, dielectricity.


I feet sorry for David LaPointe, he works hard, hes trying to understand, but hes got it waaaaaaaay wrong.


he actually thinks the TOP vortex formation in his "bowls" analogy is magnetism, and the bottom is electrical

Uggggggh He just needs a hard slap against the head.


He is 100% clueless about centripetal and centrifugal, and 10,000% CLUELESS that what forms his "double bowl" shape (as he accurately depicts) is the dielectric inertial plane driving the double hyperbola of centrifugal magnetism.

One HARD slap might fix his mental misunderstanding. (really hard).


He keeps talking about "magnetic bowl shaped formations", but hes clueless that what hes trying to grasp but doesnt is the DOUBLE HYPERBOLA of centrifugal magnetic fields reciprocating, and the center centripetal fields and between both of his "salad bowls" of magnetism is the dielectric inertial plane.


He also speak about magnetism as an entity in and of its on accord. Which nowhere exists in nature.


The "wave particle duality" nonsense is a misgrasp of the fact that ALL TEM ("transverse electromagnetism") contains a radial dielectric.

This is the REAL explanation behind the "photoelectric effect" to which the demented fool Einstein won his "prize".


He got most of descriptions right, but got the explanation wholly 100% wrong

This is extremely typical of the cult of quantum.

and others while claiming it as your own work by repackaging it.  What are the odds of finding equations related to the ratio of 3.23606 parts dielectricity to 1 part magnetism and the golden ratio (see first snapshot below) with the uncommon word of incommensurable (see second snapshot below) along with a very similar magnetic field model, all of which is by the same author of Jerry E. Bayles (see third snapshot below)?  It appears Bayles' quantum vlm rotational velocity is the same as your "dielectric inertial plane".

Listen up, ( Jerry E. Bayles, Oliver Crane) .........I NEVER HEARD OF THOSE OTHER 2 GUYS, and as for David LaPointe, I ONLY saw his well made RANCIDLY WRONG well-made videos after I was 80% done with my book.


David LaPointe doesn't understand a DAMN THING,  he NEVER mentions the dielectric inertial plane,  he is kinda on the "right track" but OHHHHHHH SOOOOOOOO WRONG


He just needs a hard slap.    But he sounds like a hubris filled fool.       HIS IDIOT  "bowl shaped" magnets,  he doesnt even grasp that his "salad bowls" are the shape of centrifugal magnetic flow, a pair of double hyperbolas.



Dont compare his well made TRASH VIDEOS with anything Ive written.






YOU SAID:
It appears Bayles' quantum vlm rotational velocity is the same as your "dielectric inertial plane".



It looks like thats the case yes,  TOO BAD his brain fahrt  calls is a "quantum rim"


When IDIOTS in the Cult of Quantum dont "get" something they call it  "Quantum X"  ......I know exactly what the hell it is,  he obviously doesn't     

[TheoriaApophasis]

What are the odds of finding equations related to the ratio of 3.23606 parts dielectricity to 1 part magnetism and the golden ratio (see first snapshot below) with the uncommon word of incommensurable

Let me give you a HEADS UP,   I translate ancient Greek,  and am the #1 person in the world as EXPERT on Greek Incommensurability,   and have written 2 small books on that topic

proof of same here of my works into that LONG LONG AGO:
https://archive.org/details/IndefiniteDyadPlotinusMetaphysicsMysticism

https://archive.org/details/PythagorasPlatoAndTheGoldenRatio

however that last book is very incomplete, I wrote it a LONG LONG TIME ago.


If ANYONE stole anything about the golden section, and Incommensurability, and Phi^2 , its them from myself.


I have 3 HAND written books of notes , each 250 pages on MY discoveries into incommensurability and the golden section,


took me 4 years to make this proof, and it certainly has nothing to do with the idiots you quoted. >>