Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

Captain Zero:
DO NOT try to imply in any way that I am evil

No worries, I would never imply this.


You're a hubris filled keyboard jockey who has been sucking off the teets of  GR and QM   Atomistic mysticism your whole life.


You dont invent

You dont create

You dont experiment.



Which is OK, .....its that you're a "worthless lump" , a SPEED BUMP on the road of discovery to WEAKER MINDS than mine who DO experiment, test, discover, and investigate.

Your brand of BS would never work on me.   I only feel bad for your "cant do it"  BS attitude which likely MAY and DOES work upon weaker minds.


Your entire premise in life is called a "dog in the manger"   Go look up that analogy.



Officially, you have a Phd in lip flapping and BS.     

[MileHigh]

Theoria:

This is your explanation for Tinman's experiment:

Hydrogen bubble vortex magneto-centrifugal edge movement as it raises to pressure gradient equalization (as a gas) in the water he has it in.
diamagnetic H2 bubbles running in flow with centrifugal high speed magnetic vortex flow.

Sorry, but that is wrong.

However, it sounds like the propulsion method for the miniaturized submarine in Fantastic Voyage!  lol

MileHigh

P.S.:   A reminder about you:  (1) Failure to discuss three Bedini motor electrical design issues.  (2) Failure to discuss the coil-flywheel issue.  And this is from a person that has allegedly been studying this stuff for 20 years and has built several Bedini motors.

[Cap-Z-ro]

Captain Zero:

In a virtual sense, you don't realize that you have on thick glazed glasses that make you look like there are two eyeball-sized spheres on your face.  It's that bad.  You spilled your beans there but I already knew it.

I will repeat:  DO NOT try to imply in any way that I am evil or MIB.  I will not tolerate it because there are safety issues to consider.

MileHigh

Safety issues for a pseudonym ??

In a PIGS eye there are.

I knew it was a waste of time...you are just what you come across as...and the titles come with the territory.

And you come across as a paid disinfo agent...so you will just have to live with that.

Stoopid is as stoopid does.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Sorry, but that is wrong.

However, it sounds like the propulsion method for the miniaturized submarine in Fantastic Voyage!  lol

A: rising gas in ANY liquid is no propulsion for anything son, NOR was it even implied pathetic child.


B: I warned you about the fallacy of a non-rebuttal   "no, thats wrong"


That feces doesnt fly here.      

[gravityblock]

Wattsup-did you watch the video?. If so,can you explain as to why we get zero spin when i use the piece of pipe that has no magnetic field,and as soon as i add a magnet to that very same piece of pipe,we get a very clear spin. Why dose the spin direction change when flipping a magnet over-the very same magnet,with the very same shape?.
The magnetic fields are needed to create the spin,there is no doubt about that.

Your analysis is correct!  By taking a look at the Lorentz force in a conducting liquid using a diametrical current we can see there is a CW motion over one half of the magnet and a CCW rotation over the other half of the magnet.  These two cancel each other out resulting in no rotation when using a diametrical current in a traditional homopolar motor.  However, if we have two counter rotating discs over the same pole of a magnet (see snapshot below), then we can use a diametrical current.  I have personally conducted this experiment myself, and I can confirm there is a counter rotation of the disks (one disk rotating CW and the other disk rotating CCW).  Each disk was half the diameter of the magnet in my experiment.  Disk 1 and disk 2 can mesh together like gears.  This shows there are two dielectric inertial planes in a magnet instead of one dielectric inertial plane as TA wrongly concludes, lol.  Two counter rotating dielectric inertial planes moving one against the other like gears. 

On pages 136 & 137 which was previously posted (see snapshot below for a quick reference), Faraday talks about the 'center of motion'.  He says when the magnetic pole is on the outside of the center of motion, then the wire piece will move in a direction directly contrary to that taken when the pole was on the inside of the center of motion.

Gravock