Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

Started by TheoriaApophasis, July 13, 2014, 04:20:12 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 59 Guests are viewing this topic.

gravityblock

Quote from: TheoriaApophasis on July 20, 2014, 08:01:26 PM

Let me Edu-macate you a bit.
   ;D ;D

Let me educate you, if that is even possible!  A rotating electromagnet wrapped in aluminium foil will prove your statement below wrong:

"NO SPIN with EM vs. PM because:

A: electromagnet is "driving" the magnetism via electricity, >>>>NOT dielectricity<<<<, as is the case in a PM, of which the
dielectricity is 'driving' the vortex from the inter-atomic made coherent into the incommensurable geometry of the PM

B: Electromagnet is spatially divergent IN/AS a coil, and does NOT (almost the exact opposite) have the properties of dielectricity
as found in a PM
which is "driving" a genuine PM !!"
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result.

God will confuse the wise with the simplest things of this world.  He will catch the wise in their own craftiness.

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: gravityblock on July 20, 2014, 08:23:57 PM
Let me educate you, if that is even possible!  A rotating electromagnet wrapped in aluminium foil will prove your statement below wrong   



Lets RE-STATE the part you missed, the part you IGNORED, the part you mentally diverted from, the part you are intentionally blinding yourself to:



ROTATION   =
  sitting on a STOOL and spinning round.   (driven by electricity as per the coil)


Conjugate RECIPROCATION = Centrifugal polarized divergence returning (to the other side) CENTRIPETALLY (convergent)   ,.....all driven by dielectricity.




As has been proven, with enough POWER, you can ROTATE a strawberry and a living FROG in a field.



Maybe you cannot read:



93RDELEMENT

Please for get this vortex with a magnet its nuts ! Magnetic lines do not flow only electrons and bosons in the field do ! A single  magnetic line of force is made of a single electron with polarised X Y particles 2.2 trillion of them . Its like a frozen wave and particle formation But one may make the line vibrate it has no response than that and has no entropy to set up a vortex ... Super strings do but they are made of dark matter 2.2 trillion times smaller than an electron . Remember an electron is 2.2 trillion times smaller than its nuclei . Having said this ferrite weak magnetic fields do brake away if set up right with opposing fields but to make them go into a vortex mode of transition would be a very complex and difficult thing to achieve . Best just to look at it happening when galaxies collide the magnetic fluctuations will last for billions of years . But a man made magnetic vortex no way particle stimulation yes but magnet lines of force not a chance . SORRY .....

me

gravityblock

TA,

You're dropping the ball big time!

Your false assertion and wrong claim in there being NO SPIN with an EM, as there is in a PM, as shown by TinMan's incomplete and half-ass experiment is because:

A: electromagnet is "driving" the magnetism via electricity, >>>>NOT dielectricity<<<<, as is the case in a PM, of which the
dielectricity is 'driving' the vortex from the inter-atomic made coherent into the incommensurable geometry of the PM

B: Electromagnet is spatially divergent IN/AS a coil, and does NOT (almost the exact opposite) have the properties of dielectricity
as found in a PM
which is "driving" a genuine PM !!"

Now, when it is shown there is a spin with an EM wrapped in aluminium foil to mimic the conductive nickel coating on a PM, then 'a' and 'b' above can not be correct!  You can try and misdirect the readers all you want, but I know otherwise, and the correct experiment will show the readers what I am saying to be true!

Gravock
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result.

God will confuse the wise with the simplest things of this world.  He will catch the wise in their own craftiness.

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: gravityblock on July 20, 2014, 10:03:07 PM

Now, when it is shown there is a spin
Gravock


You have a mental defect son.   A GIGANTIC ONE


The EARTH SPINS


Its FIELD  has conjugate RECIPROCATION,   CW ,and CCW,     Centrifugal and Centripetal.   Divergent and Convergent.


If, in your insanity you think the spinning / rotating earth  is = (the above highlighted),      then you need your head examined son.



Seek mental help  ;D  ;D



Now, go find a NAIL, and sit on it and spin /rotate.   ;D   You have no idea what the hell has been said in the last few posts.

OR, you DO, but are ignoring same to save face,   which is pure pathetic hubris.


Now, go wise the hell up.


ROTATE / SPIN     VS.    RECIPROCATION