Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[Cap-Z-ro]

You catch who in what mistake?.

Well, TA of course...who wlse ?

He's is/was the only one (besides me) who hadn't made 1 or 3 in this thread.

*takes humble bow with toes pointed inward*

Regards...

[MileHigh]

Quote from Captain Zero:

There are more than 2 paid  in operation on this thread

I am asking people reading this thread to denounce this type of behaviour.  It's unacceptable and smacks of the 1930s.  Shall people that argue the technical merits of a proposition wear a special symbol on our clothing?

Captain Zero knows zero about me in real life and he fails to look at propositions in an unbiased manner.  He often ignores the reprehensible forum behaviour of people putting forth dubious or outright ridiculous propositions if he (mistakenly) believes they have merit, even if they are jaw-droppingly ridiculous, and I am not being specific to this thread.  The reality is that sometimes propositions are put forth that someone with basic common sense and no technical skills and education would recognize as being false.

The fact that Captain Zero would even suspect that there are paid operatives here to rebut simplistic or ridiculous propositions that don't make any sense says much about Captain Zero and nothing about the person promoting the false proposition or the person rebutting the false proposition with logical arguments.

Again, I am asking people to publicly denounce this kind of behaviour.  It is simply unacceptable and he should not be allowed to get away with it.

MileHigh

[93RDELEMENT]

GRAVITYBLOCK YOU SIR ARE RIGHT ! NOW SPIN THE FOIL ! DIALETRIC INERTHIA WHAT A LOAD OF TRIPE ! ALL THE LOOK AT ME I AM SO GOOD AND THAN THE BLIND SPOT HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA ..... IN MY BOOK NEITHER WILL SPIN IN A ZERO G ENVIRNMENT ...

You are all 50% RIGHT AND THE REST IS GOBBLDYGOUK NONSENSE ,,,,,, GO WRITE A BOOK ABOUT A BLIND MAN AND A PET MAGNET HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH  SO YOU THINK THE ANGLE OF SPINNING WATER GOING DOWN A HOLE IS DUE TO A DIALECTRIC HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA OK OOOOOOHHHHHH NOOOOOO HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

SILLY MONKEY HAHAHAHAHAH NICE BOOK HAHAHAHAH BUT IT ANINT WORTH A PEANUT !!!!! You wrote a book on the whim and some out of date data and you wont the world to believe it yet you can not prove it as it is wrong . You cant even make an indirect experiment to give the stupid theory and gravity hahahahahah OH THE GRAVITY OF IT HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAH NO BECAUSE YOU DONT KNOW WHAT GRAVITY IS DO YOU ITS SPACE TIME CURITURE NOT A DIALETRIC YOU BUMBLLING MONKEY GO BACK TO THE STUPID SCHOOL AND CRY OUT THE WORDS YUMMYBUMBEERLYIMADEASILLYHUBBALYTUMBERLY HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA NOW YOU WANT TO REINVENT GRAVITY AS A DIALETRIC FORCE Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah !!!

So its me the one who can crush every rock you throw until you find its gravity .. WARNING TO ALL HUMANITY DONT LISTEN TO A DIALETRIC GRAVITY THEORY ITS NUTS ...... AND SO FAR WRONG THAT THE WORD WRONG IS THE WRONG WORD FOR IT ..

Now you guys stop the little boy games all the insults the twisting of science contrived twitter twatter bull .........................................

Do you want the proof here and now and stand totally ashamed embraced with only an ideology that is outside the excepted rules of physics and what about the man himself old albert the one who worked it all out .. Oh no you just want to take him on in the hope your have a brain better than him . Did old albert ever write in the manner that I have been reading when submitting he's work ? Is there one sentence written by the grate man that is vindictive to anyone that said he was wrong ? NO ... I am saddened by this childish pathetic scuba bling bing bong .... I came here to read and write science ! So far all I can ready is stupidity wrapped up in attempt to make your egos enflamed by your so called intelligence !

Now list to me ! I have a device that measure's space time curvature and the so called diametric of the earth they have the same vector because the dielectric constant follows gravity ... But the dielectric field will never go down a plug hole or ever spin a magnet without gravity .... Take away gravity and you lose the dielectric effect .. !!!!! YOU SILLY MONKEYS !!!!

ME


   





 



     

[Cap-Z-ro]

I know nothing of this character in real life...just another desperate delusionary distortion put forward to try to salvage self destroyed credibility.

He/she/it/they have been outed by other members besides me for incessantly preventing the development of many ideas up for discussion, because it is well known that that is how other things are discovered.

This important dialogue process was proven out again yesterday in an experiment conducted by TinMan, in this thread, inspired by a very persistent Theo, who endured 9 yards of Sh!t flung in his path by the MH entity and his cohorts.

That never would have happened if he had given up in frustration, as so many before him had done.

Facts are facts.

Case proven and rested.


So much for his being "done" in this thread...his word is no good either.

Regards...

[TheoriaApophasis]

Would be nice to have a better illustration of these centriptetal/centrifugal fields as applies to a ring magnet instead of a single solid bar magnet structure.

Modelling compounded magnets is:

A: a pain in the ass


B: its hard enough showing (not meaning you) weak minded ass-scratching monkeys how a NORMAL magnet works, ..........ergo no need (at this time) to complicate it for their squishy little brians