Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

Started by TheoriaApophasis, July 13, 2014, 04:20:12 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 22 Guests are viewing this topic.

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: tinman on July 21, 2014, 08:39:38 AM
This statement is correct as far as my test showed,which were done prior to the water test. Look at the picture below of a simple homopolar motor. We can place the conducting wire(the wire that touches the magnet) from the positive of the battery in/on the north end/south end,or center of the magnet,and it will spin in the same direction.Nothing speacial,i know-just saying. Of course i know that if we flip the magnet over,it will spin in the opposite direction,as it will if we swap the voltage polarity over.And if we do both at the same time,the spin direction wont change-all this i know Gravoc. Hope that clears that up.


Without going into great detail, your diagram (glad you posted it for others to see) shows on the simplex homopolar motor, the circuit  BETWEEN  the centripetal on a magnet AND the dielectric inertial plane (along the equator OF ANY AND ALL MAGNETS).

WHICH, in so doing, is "cutting" the flowing centrifugal magnetism (the 'sourced' [i explain this in detail in the book]) "genuine" magnetism)

;)




See pics below  RED is centripetal (CONvergent) returning magnetism)

green is the inertial plane of dielectricity

BLUE is the centrifugal magnetism

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: Cap-Z-ro on July 21, 2014, 08:48:37 AM

You left out the part where you had to fight your way thru 9 yards of bullsh!t from naysayers, nitpickers, and shills, some of which are chronicled in my old but still relevant thread dedicated their activities...


Too true,     ALAS,  unfortunate for "THEM",  as someone madly skilled at ancient Greek dialectic and the Greek platonic method of "seeing thru skepticism, fallacies and subversive bullshit"    they haven't seen the likes of me before.

If they want to tangle, Id rather just stick to the topic, ....but if they want, I will, figuratively,.........dance on their little pin heads, and piss on their guts.





TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: tinman on July 21, 2014, 09:02:49 AM
The thing with doing it in water,is that the current is going in every direction.


yes and no,  DUE to the magneto-dielectric 'electrical geometry' of the NEO,  the current is directed ('attracted at the points of') at >>> both ends centripetally and along the inertial plane<<<,  ....

........AT WHICH TIME you are getting CENTRIFUGAL divergent acceleration (resultantly however, of course, ....out of the ENTIRE magnet), but said divergent motion (and resultant movement) is driving the CW and CCW motion of the ENTIRE magnet.


But as per the attractive point (on the magneto-dielectric geometry of the magnet) OF THE ENTIRE COLLECTIVE charge in the water........directed to same, regardless of where (as seen in your VID) you place the cathode or anode

;)   :)  :)

93RDELEMENT

At last some fresh air all that EGO and a daft empty attempt to re-write the law of truth the TERM DIALETRIC INERTSHIA IS NOW A DODO HAHAHA !!! But the term space time curvature is what give directional force to the effect and that is gravity !! Try this trick with the magnet in a zero g environment like space and it can not work no gravity no spin on the magnet . But this is not about a magnet its about a magnetic vortex and I must say that is interesting and the more I think about it the more interesting it gets .

One experiments I made a few years ago was a simple study with small 3 inch ferrite magnets 12 in a ring 5 stacked up at each point with a single magnet and a counter weight spinning ! The gap between each stack started at 5 inches after each try I positioned the stacks closer until on the 5th try they were all touching . There is and opposing forces between each stack so I had to tape them closer each try .. When I got to the 5th turn and the stacks were all touching something strange happened and I wrote it down as a field burst where a release of flux spread all over the room and the magnets lost the ability to attract the armature . I had to take each stack and isolate them for 4 hours for the field to return to normal .   

After that I started to work with opposing and iron that had a 2.2 degree curvature and to my surprise a field bubble was created over the iron which grew slowly. When stopped I taped strongly with a small hammer and the bubble burst but would not re-grow in the same spot on the ground where the experiment had taken place ..   I had to move the experiment 4 meters away before the bubble grew again !

I monitored the position of each experiment and noticed that a full cycle of the moon had to pass before a bubble could be set up in the same spot .. The term magnetic vortex may have some truth to it but not while the magnet is still in the same position so in simple terms you make the vortex and than you have to move away the apparatus leavening behind an invisible vortex ! This system is also a very good way to measure gravity and is obvious as in every position to ground you make the experiment the size and strength of the bubble is different ..

Sorry if my English gram her is not in the American style or if my writing is simply simple its just that my observations of the universe are relatively simple ! I never paint with words and only build with mathematics ! The follow on from this work was to build a device to confirm the dielectric constant and its relationship with gravity to that I mastered many things including particle physics . I now build zero point generators for private clients and continue to study the elusive graviton . The main problem with all things zero point or over unity is that the physics is not academic its science for anyone with an interest in such things and the out of date world of academics is falling behind very fast. Knowledge is fact over fiction nothing else its not a personal encounter or should it ever be and those that cloud it with there ability to blind themselves with deluded words and half measured effects should let go and build a house to see what it would look like if they don't use a door to enter it . The truth is inside that is where the home of truth lives not on the roof or in a flower basket hanging pretty on the out side so please keep the facts flowing into the house of truth and through the door of reality and knowledge.

Now that is enough of poetry ! which one of you will confirm with me a real magnetic vortex ????? or are you all just pretending to experiment ???


ME





     



 







TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: wattsup on July 21, 2014, 09:03:39 AM
What the hell, are you guys sleep-posting again. hahaha So much intensity and not one piece of toast was added on the table.
wattsup: """""But then I read "there is no Ether in space, only space within the Ether", just cannot figure that one out.""""""

Neither can most people.

What you are stating here is an oxymoron. So if ether is everywhere, how is it not in space. May as well say there is no juice in an orange, only orange in the juice. Helloooooooooooo. Anyone home. May as well try 1 + 2 does not = 3, but 3 = 2 + 1. What part of the brain is this type of logic supposed to reside?




Its only oxymoronic in your own mind, which is no fault of mine.      Great detail of this is made in the 3rd edition, just as I had planned to do.


Yes, there are NO "fields in space",  only space as a posterior attribute.


You, like MOST people, have reified the attribute as the medium (as Einstein and other did)

or rather reified the resultant as the causative.


There is ALSO a "big goddamn reason"  that the number  4 (Xaos / space) doesnt exist in the golden section     1 1 2 3 5 8 13........   (Oh hell, where is 4????)


Dr. Oleg D. Jefimenkos own formulas PROVE beyond ANY SHADOW of a doubt that space is unreal, AND posterior to fields.


Tesla said the SAME GODDAMN THING...........  Space 'as something'  that 'does things' or  'acts upon things'  is pure 100% REIFIED Horse plop.