Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

Any spoilers available or must we wait for the new video?
When do you think it will be available?
PW

WELL>>>>>>>>>>>  HERE IS HIS VIDEO ,   I WAS RIGHT............U WERE WRONG                


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vO-EcDBvyw8&list=UUsLiBC2cL5GsZGLcj2rm-4w


YOU KNOW HOW I KNEW???         Because ALL CENTRIPETAL [[[[at the center of every 'pole' of every magnet]]]]   (not the outer-edge centrifugal !!!!!) is the POINT THRU WHICH CHARGE OCCURS


this pic is for YOU:

[picowatt]

Here is PW's seguested test.Im now off to the workshop to see if the spinning magnet motor still works with insulation tape wound around it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vO-EcDBvyw8&list=UUsLiBC2cL5GsZGLcj2rm-4w

P.S-sorry about the quality of the video-not sure what happened there.

Very interesting Tinman.  Thanks for doing that.  If you are using an adjustable supply, you might try to see if the spin rate correlates directly with current flow.  That would also tend to indicate homopolar action imparting spin into the electrolyte.

Regarding the EM you used.  Did I see correctly that it had a tubular core?  If so, do you have anything solid that you can either replace or modify the core with so that it has a cross section more similar to the neo (particularly at the poles)?

Thanks again, I always enjoy your videos and appreciate your time...

PW.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Damn your difficult.

Do you even agree that in the upper two images that you posted, that the big machine into which the caps are discharged and which has two large iron pole pieces is a "magnetizer"?

Do you also believe that the machine (i.e., the magnetizer) depicted in those images passes electrical current directly thru the magnet being magnetized?

PW

Damn your are DUMB

Its CALLED A MAGNETIZER,    dummy.    Because it it used to to create magnets.     It DOES SO by CHARGED INDUCTION   dummy


DIRECTLY?


Define DIRECTLY  son???  ROFL !!!!!

How did you think a magnetizer works?  Temporary magnetization or creating a permanent magnet, ....the fields of dielectricity and magnetism are ALIGNED to create acceleration to the electomagnet (from iron for example).


An inductive charge is placed from the cap banks, thru the coils and THRU the "magnet" , of which a portion of the charge is left "permanently" remaining.

Just like running a fast river for an instant in the sand, leaving a permanent "mark", in this case, the "mark" is the dis-equilibrium of the magneto-dielectric in and of the (now) "magnet".


Let me WISE YOU THE HECK up (no offense, honestly)  ....


CONTACT electrification, and INDUCTION electrification are  BOTH #&*@(@(@  ELECTRIFICATION

[d3x0r]

Regarding diametric magnetized magnet... would be the same if you put the other axially magnetized on it's side... ( so the vortex from north goes (cw) and the other side goes (ccw) which makes a generla feed in one direction, which will look like sluffing off to the side.)


Radial magnetized is with north in the center and south on the outside...


(images)  from https://www.kjmagnetics.com/magdir.asp  and ring section of http://www.duramag.com/magnetization-options-for-neodymium-iron-boron-samarium-cobalt-ceramic-magnets/
1) diametric (across the diameter)
2) axial  (along the axis)
3) radial

[picowatt]

WELL>>>>>>>>>>>  HERE IS HIS VIDEO ,   I WAS RIGHT............U WERE WRONG                


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vO-EcDBvyw8&list=UUsLiBC2cL5GsZGLcj2rm-4w


YOU KNOW HOW I KNEW???         Because ALL CENTRIPETAL [[[[at the center of every 'pole' of every magnet]]]]   (not the outer-edge centrifugal !!!!!) is the POINT THRU WHICH CHARGE OCCURS


this pic is for YOU:

A bit early to draw any conclusions, don't you think?  That would be a typical newbie experimenter mistake.

One can see that the amount of electrolyte spinning at the sides (of the neo (and in general) greatly reduced when the tape was applied.  This tends to support the homopolar torque speculation.  However, it is too soon to draw any solid conclusions.

Current is still flowing in the presence of a magnetic field, and in the tape covered neo, As tinman noted, there now appears to be a series of smaller vortices generated when the tape is applied to the neo, as opposed to the more general and singular overall spin observed when the tape was not applied to the neo.  It also appears that the vortices generated are closer to the edge of the tape covered neo where current flow continues to more so perpendicular to the magnetic axis.

The character of the observed vortex did indeed change when the tape was applied. 

So now a next experiment must be devised to further isolate a variable.

But for now, I am going to bed.

PW