Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

If this is the case, then reversing the polarity of the current wouldn't reverse the direction of rotation.
Gravock

Holy F-ING SH*T!!!!!!       Of course the DIRECTION OF ROTATION CHANGES on the magnetic mass,   dummy      


That has no *##&@# bearing on the fact that the charge ENTERS CENTRIPETALLY 



Change the polarity from CW centripetal   to CCW centripetal   (BOTH ARE CENTRIPETAL)...........Yes, the rotation changes


ROFL      How old are you,,....honestly?



Lets look at the diagram again,   (but for you, the FIRST TIME)


Hmmmmmmm  CW centripetal ......... AND  CCW centripetal


Yup, there it is.

[gravityblock]

Holy F-ING SH*T!!!!!!       Of course the DIRECTION OF ROTATION CHANGES on the magnetic mass,   dummy      


That has no *##&@# bearing on the fact that the charge ENTERS CENTRIPETALLY

So, according to you, the charges flow in the same direction and enters centripetally regardless of the polarity of the current?

Gravock

[TheoriaApophasis]

So, according to you, the charges flow in the same direction and enters centripetally regardless of the polarity of the current?

Gravock

Centripetal is centripetal ,    CW or CCW

Reverse the polarity,  you REVERSE the POLARITY   (wow, what a stunning conclusion that is!!!!!)    


Hmmmmmmm  Polarity  ,.........does that mean the CHARGE has "reverse polarity"  ENTERING CENTRIPETALLY , AT the  OTHER CENTRIPETAL charge point?


OMFG

  This is why Socrates was happy to drink the Hemlock. 

[gravityblock]

Centripetal is centripetal ,    CW or CCW

Reverse the polarity,  you REVERSE the POLARITY   (wow, what a stunning conclusion that is!!!!!)   


Hmmmmmmm  Polarity  ,.........does that mean the CHARGE has "reverse polarity"  ENTERING CENTRIPETALLY , AT the  OTHER CENTRIPETAL charge point?


OMFG

  This is why Socrates was happy to drink the Hemlock.

Centripetal current means the charges are flowing from the rim to the axis.  Centrifugal current means the charges are flowing from the axis towards the rim. Feel free to replace 'rim' with the 'center point between the two poles' if you like.

Gravock

[picowatt]

TA
Maybe we all should hold off on insulting remark's-and i mean all of us. You must understand that the guy's here are here to help(well most anyway). Look at it like this-once all the probable causes are found not to be true,then what is left must be true. Im happy to do these test 1 by 1 ,as requested. And i will do them to the best of my ability. You will now see that 1 by 1, more questions are being raised. the next video ! im sure ! will bring more questions and confusion. We have PW, saying Quote: If this is correct, taping the sides of the neo should reduce the current flow perpendicular to the neo's magnetic axis, reducing or eliminating the torque/electrolyte spin and vortex. MH and Gravoc also agreed with this. This is what we need TA,things to try-this is how we get answer's.

So here is a video that bring's more question's .lol

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xmwnsCw2BI&list=UUsLiBC2cL5GsZGLcj2rm-4w

Tinman,

Interesting video.  But again, we still have current flow in the presence of a magnetic field, so it is not unreasonable to expect spin.  Can you tell if the torque is reduced with the tape applied (possibly via spin up rate)?  As well, does the spin rate vary with the applied current?

I am more so interested in the bubble vortex difference when using the PM versus EM.  Now that we know that a spin still appears with the neo's sides taped it will be easier to do tests with the EM.  Although the taped neo produced a somewhat different vortex appearance, with smaller multiple vortices, it is possible that these represent something closer to truth that may actually have been masked by the larger overall spin produced via the side torque.  It must also be kept in mind, however, that we still have current flow in the presence of an electrical field, so it is not at all unrealistic to expect spin generation via conventional means.  However, one would also expect a similar result from an electromagnet.

Therefore, a first experiment regarding the EM that might be considered is to modify the core of the EM so that its cross section is similar to the neo, particularly with regard to the poles, and repeat the test.  Was your EM core tubular?  Consider changing the core to a solid one or insert something into the tubular core to make the EM poles more similar to the neo.  Also, it would be wise to use a spring scale or a lift test to determine the current needed to make the EM similar to the PM in strength.  But again, the core cross section should be made similar to the neo before doing so.  Also, make sure the EM coil is electrically isolated from the electrolyte so as not to influence the current path.


Appreciate your time,

PW