Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[picowatt]

Fields influence fields, there is no argument, however you really need to see the picture below.....and realize this END ON view of  AC TRANSMISSION LINES is nearly 100% same as a permanent magnet

only difference is some spread because you have TWO WIRES rather than a super-binding sphere/cylinder etc etc "physical magnet"

Its only due to immense study of Platonic incommensurability I have a firm grip inverse moving conjugate fields in a binding magneto-dielectric geometry.
Its also a wholly LOST ART of thinking methodology called retroduction.


Depends on what you are connotating (or denotating) as  " STATIONARY "..... = equalization / equilibrium

Or "moving IN perfect equalibrium"

movement is an extrapolation of space AND time (>>>>>and therefore a resultant modality of a radiative field<<<<<<).........    Spacetime is a posterior attribute TO and OF radiative fields.....


This is where Einstein turned into a mental midget, he reified the attribute (space) as THAT which "does stuff"     

Chicken AND (NOT OR!!) Egg  situation   

all movement is forcing fields against fields and getting = Induction, electrification, force etc etc etc.

What is the configuration of the magnet behind the viewing film in shot 1819?

Regarding field motion, relative to the bulk mass of the magnet, are the fields stationary? 

PW

[Bob Smith]

I am struck with wonder and awe at the beauty of this new window on the universe.
Thanks for sharing this inspiring work, Ken.
Bob

[Cap-Z-ro]

If whatever emanates from the poles of a magnet has an actual physical spin as TA depicts, is it unreasonable to expect that two like poles in axial alignment and proximity would cause the magnets to spin?  Fairly easy to test.  If necessary it may also be possible to devise an experiment using open center cylindrical magnets wherein the "centripetal" field/flux is routed through the center of the cylindrical magnets to the opposing pole so that the majority of the flux being tested for rotation involves primarily the more external "centrifugal" flux.

As well, if there are indeed physically rotating fields, it would be reasonable to expect that two magnets placed side by side with their magnetic axes parallel and supported by bearings to rotate when brought into proximity.

If the vortex observed in all these experiments utilizing current flow to generate H2 exist solely as a property of the magnet alone, and not the interaction of electric/ion currents flowing in proximity to the magnet, should not that vortex or spin cause magnets aligned as above to also spin?

With the many attempts made to create PM only motors, why has this spin not yet been observed?

Possibly TA's diagrams refer only to motionless field polarities/vectors emanating to/from the magnetic poles.

PW

I was just tossing it in the ring PW.

It will take some time to go back and digest all that has been laid out amid the distractions.

Regards...

[TheoriaApophasis]

What is the configuration of the magnet behind the viewing film in shot 1819?

You didnt read it above.     1819 is END ON view of AC transmission lines......same as running down your street

BUT that is also the cross section of a magnet,  top to bottom polarization ,   with the differences mentioned above,  that being the boundary of the physical magnet and the mutual centripetal and centrifugal reciprocation.

While accurate only END ON (the AC LINES) as a model of magnetism, the incommensurable magneto-dielectric "field of dielectricity" (Maxwell) is still correct and applicable.

There is no nucleal precession going on in AC transmission lines, (of course)


In the true 3D model of the magnet you would need ENDLESS trillions of AC lines all moving "down the page (end on)"  and undergoing line (in this case nucleus) precession to get the centripetal and centrifugal field interlacing.

Regarding field motion, relative to the bulk mass of the magnet, are the fields stationary? 

The formulas for that are in Dr. Oleg D. Jefimenkos book:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0917406230/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o01_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1


Motion only pertains to spatial fields,   there can be no MOTION in dielectricity unless, as Tesla did, create longitudinal superluminal transmissions, WHILE much faster than light, still have a speed, but that is relative to the induction potential of the Ether, and the field drag of both gravity and ambient magnetism limiting I.A.A.A.D from occurring.


Movement and magnetic precession is occurring , its often called Larmor Precession.

The classical vector properties of the angular momentum of a gyroscope are analogous to many of the important characteristics of the vector properties of the mechanical magnetic inertia. The reason for the close analogy is due to the important and critical connection between the dielectric inertial plane and the angular momentum due to the dielectric's acceleration, or spin. For example, the rotating mass of a gyroscope possesses angular momentum, which can be represented by a vector whose direction is along the symmetry axis of rotation. A gyroscope in a field precesses, i.e., the axis of its rotation precesses around the direction of the counterspatial field. What factors determine the rate of precession of the gyroscope? The answer is the field force at the center of rotation and the inherent angular momentum of the gyroscope, or in this case the dielectric plane and its acceleration. If the angular momentum, which is determined by the angular velocity of spin and the mass of the gyroscope, is constant, the rate of precession ω is determined only by the centripetal field force, so that there is a proportionality between the rate of precession and the centripetal field force, where γ (compare to the magnetogyric ratio) is the scalar proportionality constant between the precessional frequency and the centripetal field force. ω (Larmor frequency) = γeH


Protons precess coherently when in the presence of a powerful dielectric field. The frequency at which the precession occurs is called the Larmor frequency. This causes an oscillating and precessing magnetic field that can be measured.

In electrification in the creation of a "magnet" not only are the XYZ vectors of magneto-dielectric inertial planes brought into coherency, so too are the directions of their dielectric 'flywheels' all amplified to the same direction. Just like our gyroscopic analogy, you can have 10 gyroscopes with their flywheels all spinning in different directions and yet their XYZ axis of the magneto-dielectric volumes are still aligned, however in touching all 10 at the same time, you will get variegated precessional incoherent reactions. However as is in the case with electrification and dielectric saturation in the creation of a "magnet", all dielectric inter-atomic fields are accelerated in a singular pulse of phased dielectric coherency. This is also why CW on CW magnetic approaches causes immense Ether pressure resistance (counter-voidance), because the dielectric-momentum of all the many trillions of atoms in the "magnet" are resisting breaking torque from an outside pressure of counter-voidance. This is in-phase precession post-electrification in creating a magnet.

Gyromagnetic ratios, and magnetic precession is nothing of my discovery, this principle is part and parcel to all magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (NMRI) technology, however the entire field of MRI technology is senseless and clueless that a permanent magnet exhibits this due to special magneto-dielectric field geometry. MRI use enormous power to generate these magnetic precessions, which field contrasts are then used to image and determine what is being scanned. Enormous pulsing power is used in the creation of MRI images, however a single large pulse is used to create an identical precessional magnetic geometry in the permanent magnet. As is the case with most technology, things are discovered and perfected without actually understanding or caring about the principles behind them.

[tinman]

I will be doing many more test this weekend PW, and will include your seguestions
Also keep in mind everyone, that the magnet produces only H2, but we still have 2 spin diretions of H2 bubbles. This can only mean that it is the water that the force is acting against. It is also ovious thst an electrical current is needed to achieve spin in my setup. None the less, ATM it seems that the right hand dosnt apply to one of these spin directions