Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[tinman]

When, pray tell, will mankind discover the "secret" of the magnetic viewing film?

Magnetic viewing film will not give you an accurate view of the !so called! field line's. As the viewing film is made with nickel flakes suspended in thin oil,it will be showing much the same as the iron fileings trick. Each flack of nickel itself would become magnetic,just as the iron fileings do. The difference being that the nickel is much finer,and so gives a smoother look that the iron fileings do.

How it work's.
The surface of the nickel flakes are shiney and reflective,and when magnetic lines of force are parallel to the surface of the sheet,the flakes of nickel lay flat,and you see the bright lines on the sheet. When the lines of force are perpendicular to the viewing sheet,the nickel flakes stand on end,and you get the dark areas on the sheet.

[tinman]

Tinman has not discovered anything at all.  He is just exploring how current flow and magnetic fields interact and having fun doing it.  You insult science when you make stupid or ignorant statements like that.

I would have to disagree MH.Lets have a look at the electromagnet that I made(remember-my electromagnet-not little johny's down the road) Side by side with a PM,in the same test condition's.PM shows the lorentz force by way of a vortex spin around the magnet,how ever,there is no such sign of said lorentz force by way of spin on the electromagnet. So that particular electromagnet design shows different magnetic properties than that of a PM. I would say that was some sort of discovery-wouldnt you?.

And if we look at my last two video's,i would say that there is defently reason to keep looking-keep experimenting.

So you ask many people many questions,and put forth to them many !!do you know how it works!!
So in the fairness of all involved,could you tell me(us) exactly why my electromagnet shows no spin like that of the PM?.

In order to pass judgment on weather TA is correct or wrong in regards to his theories,you must know all there is to know about a magnets properties. What confusion would come if i showed a PM cylinder magnet of same inner and outer dimentions as the electromagnets core,and it showed a clear spin?.What if i have replaced the hollow core of the electromagnet with a solid iron core,and it still shows no spin-throughout a wide range of field strengths. All im saying is,there are many unanswered question about magnetic field's,and NO ONE has all the answers yet. So unless anyone is 100% full bottles on magnetic fields,then judgment cant be made.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Many here keep questioning "OTHER METHODS / DEVICES" for proving double magnetic vortex and the inertial dielectric plane.

Well, I wrote the last section on the missing secret of TEM, which is NOT (entirely) electromagnetic, but has a Z axis radial dielectric.  I wrote that section for a reason based upon Heavisides implications on the genuine nature of light.    However even he didnt ever "get it".


We have established a "device"  using 3 to 6 wavelength lasers (I will not specify) but here is ONE channel at a wavelength of 635 nm , and only snapshots off a video,.....NO VIDEO will be posted (I will not post it until things are locked in).

Nobody here can/will figure out how the device works since it uses a good bit of equipment , splitter, a special lens,  XXXXX,  and yes, (obviously) a special spinning prism

But, suffice to say, I can reproduce (obviously using lasers) the magneto-dielectric field of a strong magnet in some amazing details.

It still blows my mind to see a laser, a single channel form a vortex as it 'paints' the field within which the magnetism of the magnet displaces the dielectric component of light, or along the dielectric where the magnetism is torn asunder in the light

This is ONE device out of 5 nobody ANYWHERE (except for 3 of us) has ever seen before to show magnetic field reciprocation, and using ALL channels, easily shows the dielectric, the centripetal and centrifugal 'working' together as you twist the magnet, and move the broadcast beams.



As they used to say on the NEWS,  "you saw it here first" 

[e2matrix]

This is just another example of "We don't know everything already" so let's give some consideration to new or different ideas (like TA has):


From Science Magazine at: http://news.sciencemag.org/chemistry/2014/05/static-electricity-defies-simple-explanation

"Static Electricity Defies Simple Explanation

If you've ever wiggled a balloon against your hair, you know that rubbing together two different materials can generate static electricity. But rubbing bits of the same material can create static, too. Now, researchers have shot down a decades-old idea of how that same-stuff static comes about.

The same-material phenomenon produces important real-world effects, such as generating lightening in volcanic eruptions, gumming up the processing of powders in manufacturing, and causing explosions in grain elevators. Physicists thought they understood what was going on, but suddenly "the dominant theory appears to be dead," says Troy Shinbrot, an applied physicist at Rutgers University, New Brunswick, in New Jersey who was not involved in the new work."
Article continues at the link above but I think that says enough to validate that we "don't already know everything".   The more I know the more I know how little we know.   

[picowatt]

We have established a "device"  using 3 to 6 wavelength lasers (I will not specify) but here is ONE channel at a wavelength of 480NM , and only snapshots off a video,.....NO VIDEO will be posted (I will not post it until things are locked in).

480nm?  Blue??